tell me if u like it or not, what do they tell you etc?
Please... *)
AlisaG Hatchling 6 posts Joined Feb 2006 Location: Wonderland More info | Feb 02, 2006 18:26 | #1 tell me if u like it or not, what do they tell you etc?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 02, 2006 18:28 | #2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ragman Member 114 posts Joined Apr 2005 Location: Holland Mi. More info | Feb 02, 2006 18:37 | #3 #2's horizion appears to be a bit slanted, as with the rail in #1. #3 is kinda sad lonley
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 02, 2006 18:44 | #4 appreciate the feedback, thanks
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ragman Member 114 posts Joined Apr 2005 Location: Holland Mi. More info | Feb 02, 2006 18:52 | #5 now I am currently on a job with my low res lap top but the last 2 seem a bit grainy. I do like the second pic though. I also have the same problem with getting my pics level at times you may want to consider a tripod.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ECSouljah Member 189 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: East Coast More info | Alisa, All Canon, all the time.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 02, 2006 19:22 | #7 thank you both very much!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ajbalazic Cream of the Crop 5,228 posts Joined Jan 2005 Location: Kitchener, ON, Canada More info | Feb 02, 2006 20:24 | #8 The first shot has great atmosphere, but the fence detracts from the shot. Alan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RHardman Goldmember 1,514 posts Likes: 2 Joined Aug 2005 Location: 29 Palms, Ca. More info | Feb 02, 2006 20:47 | #9 #1 looks PS'd too much. You can see the blur where the roofs meet the sky. #3 Would be great if you could crop it to just one bench framed by the pillers. As the shot is taken you have very little room to do that. The color contrast in that shot is what makes it for me. "Whatever you can do to avoid Photoshop is worth it"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ECSouljah Member 189 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: East Coast More info | Feb 02, 2006 22:52 | #10 Alisa,
All Canon, all the time.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Robert_Lay Cream of the Crop 7,546 posts Joined Jul 2005 Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA More info | Feb 02, 2006 23:02 | #11 With the exception of #1, I will depart from my usual approach and just do readings of these images rather than critiques. But in #1, I agree with a comment above that the faux sky is a little too obvious. Bob
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 03, 2006 07:15 | #12 thank you very much for c&c, and for the edited picture, i got the idea now, and look what i've done
is it any better than a previous one?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
archosman Senior Member 325 posts Joined Aug 2005 Location: NashVegas! More info | Not sure if you're going for a particular look. What does the original look like?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ECSouljah Member 189 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: East Coast More info | It's better in some aspects but I think it can get better. Mess with the brightness and the contrast more. Use more contrast. I can see where you messed around with the brightness. Try the "sharpen" function as well... All Canon, all the time.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hellashot Goldmember 4,617 posts Likes: 2 Joined Sep 2004 Location: USA More info | Feb 04, 2006 08:58 | #15 Permanent ban#1 looks like it had a bit of shadow lightening applied... too much. 5D, Drebel, EOS-3, K1000
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2286 guests, 131 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||