Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 13 Dec 2013 (Friday) 13:06
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Microsoft ICE work with RAW files? LR workflow?

 
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 569
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Dec 14, 2013 16:26 |  #16

DetlevCM wrote in post #16527288 (external link)
It would just have to render a JPEG image based on the camera profile which it has from the camera codec pack.
This is the stuff: http://www.microsoft.c​om …oad/details.asp​x?id=26829 (external link)

In the same way that you can stitch a panorama from RAWs in Photoshop.
The end result isn't a RAW panorama, but RAWs can be used.

Yeah, but the difference:

If you are using Photoshop to do the pano, you are either going through Camera Raw or Lightroom to process the Raw files and get them "compatible" for the stitching.

So, my "point" is: if ICE only uses the ebedded jpegs for the stitching, that's not the same as processing the Raw files and the results may be good, or they may be lousy, and you can't control the processing like you can with a Raw file!

Now, if I'm somehow wrong, someone let us know!:)


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DetlevCM
Goldmember
Avatar
3,431 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 20
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Europe
     
Dec 14, 2013 16:28 |  #17

tonylong wrote in post #16527379 (external link)
Yeah, but the difference:

If you are using Photoshop to do the pano, you are either going through Camera Raw or Lightroom to process the Raw files and get them "compatible" for the stitching.

So, my "point" is: if ICE only uses the ebedded jpegs for the stitching, that's not the same as processing the Raw files and the results may be good, or they may be lousy, and you can't control the processing like you can with a Raw file!

Now, if I'm somehow wrong, someone let us know!:)

I wouldn't know how to figure that out :D.
I don't think the embedded JPEGs are full size though and if memory serves me right a panorama has a resolution appropriate to the used RAWs.
Why not try? I'm sure there are more computer savy people around here than me.

(Side note: ICE can also pull a panorama out of video on 64Bit Windows 7)


5D MK II AF Satisfaction Poll | Reduced Kit List
A Basic Guide to Photographyexternal link | Websiteexternal link
Flickrexternal link | Artflakesexternal link | Blurbexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 569
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Dec 14, 2013 16:38 |  #18

Actually newer Canon cameras have "full-sized" embedded jpegs.

So, theoretically/ideally, a set of jpegs could work fine in a pano, the same as shooting in Green Box/Auto can work fine in a pano, although when I shot cameras that only had Auto, well, it was very hit-or-miss for that type of thing!

In fact, a big factor for me getting my first DSLR was the move to Raw shooting!!!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 569
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Dec 14, 2013 16:40 |  #19

Of course if you are shooting in full Manual (including White Balance and ISO), then your out-of-camera jpegs have a better chance, hence your ICE-stitched jpegs!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DetlevCM
Goldmember
Avatar
3,431 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 20
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Europe
     
Dec 14, 2013 17:43 |  #20

tonylong wrote in post #16527422 (external link)
Of course if you are shooting in full Manual (including White Balance and ISO), then your out-of-camera jpegs have a better chance, hence your ICE-stitched jpegs!

I have an unhealthy preference for manual - so without any strange lighting throwing off the white balance or filters messing things up the images line up well.
Maybe one day I'll check... its an interesting question though, what does ICE use...


5D MK II AF Satisfaction Poll | Reduced Kit List
A Basic Guide to Photographyexternal link | Websiteexternal link
Flickrexternal link | Artflakesexternal link | Blurbexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 569
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Dec 14, 2013 20:52 |  #21

Well, if you were really curious, an interesting test would be to set the in-camera White Balance totally whacky. Take a shot, the ICE view (and the Windows browser) should look messed up. Lightroom or Camera Raw should by default look messed up as well, but you could quickly and easily switch the WB to something "correct". Of course, though, unless ICE gives the ability to make adjustments, well, that's about where it would stop! :)


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DetlevCM
Goldmember
Avatar
3,431 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 20
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Europe
     
Dec 15, 2013 05:38 |  #22

tonylong wrote in post #16527892 (external link)
Well, if you were really curious, an interesting test would be to set the in-camera White Balance totally whacky. Take a shot, the ICE view (and the Windows browser) should look messed up. Lightroom or Camera Raw should by default look messed up as well, but you could quickly and easily switch the WB to something "correct". Of course, though, unless ICE gives the ability to make adjustments, well, that's about where it would stop! :)

ICE doesn't give you any editing options besides the type of merging. I.e. what kind of projection. One would have to test ICE with and without the Microsoft Camera Codec pack - I'm fairly sure it needs it, but that still isn't a guarantee that it renders the RAWs...


5D MK II AF Satisfaction Poll | Reduced Kit List
A Basic Guide to Photographyexternal link | Websiteexternal link
Flickrexternal link | Artflakesexternal link | Blurbexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hollis_f
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,649 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 85
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Sussex, UK
     
Dec 15, 2013 05:39 |  #23

tonylong wrote in post #16527892 (external link)
Well, if you were really curious, an interesting test would be to set the in-camera White Balance totally whacky.

Shoot raw using the Monochrome picture style. If ICE is using the raw data then it will be in glorious technicolor. If it's using the embedded jpeg then it'll be B&W and no amount of fiddling will change that.


Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he'll complain about the withdrawal of his free fish entitlement.
Gear Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DetlevCM
Goldmember
Avatar
3,431 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 20
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Europe
     
Dec 15, 2013 05:49 |  #24

hollis_f wrote in post #16528519 (external link)
Shoot raw using the Monochrome picture style. If ICE is using the raw data then it will be in glorious technicolor. If it's using the embedded jpeg then it'll be B&W and no amount of fiddling will change that.

Actually a good idea - and just checked, the ICE output is in colour:

Full of moiré from the screen, but it definitely contains colour... (didn't have anything better to photograph)

IMAGE: http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/150x100q90/c/20/u93g.png
IMAGE LINK: https://imageshack.com​/i/0ku93gp  (external link)

5D MK II AF Satisfaction Poll | Reduced Kit List
A Basic Guide to Photographyexternal link | Websiteexternal link
Flickrexternal link | Artflakesexternal link | Blurbexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 569
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Dec 15, 2013 15:20 |  #25

DetlevCM wrote in post #16528529 (external link)
Actually a good idea - and just checked, the ICE output is in colour:

Full of moiré from the screen, but it definitely contains colour... (didn't have anything better to photograph)
QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: https://imageshack.com​/i/0ku93gp  (external link)

You did that with the camera set to Monochrome, and still ICE showed colors?

This gets curiouser and curiouser!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hollis_f
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,649 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 85
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Sussex, UK
     
Dec 15, 2013 16:42 |  #26

tonylong wrote in post #16529602 (external link)
You did that with the camera set to Monochrome, and still ICE showed colors?

This gets curiouser and curiouser!

Raw files ignore Picture Styles except for creation of the embedded jpeg. The fact that ICE shows colours means that it is using the raw data.

So now the interesting question is - what parameters does it use to 'develop' the image from the raw data?


Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he'll complain about the withdrawal of his free fish entitlement.
Gear Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 569
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Dec 15, 2013 17:27 |  #27

hollis_f wrote in post #16529826 (external link)
Raw files ignore Picture Styles except for creation of the embedded jpeg. The fact that ICE shows colours means that it is using the raw data.

So now the interesting question is - what parameters does it use to 'develop' the image from the raw data?

Yeah, I'm intrigued that ICE uses the Raw data at all, so yeah, what's next?

I still prefer a good Raw processor, but what's up with ICE? :)


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DetlevCM
Goldmember
Avatar
3,431 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 20
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Europe
     
Dec 16, 2013 03:18 as a reply to  @ tonylong's post |  #28

tonylong wrote in post #16529602 (external link)
You did that with the camera set to Monochrome, and still ICE showed colors?

This gets curiouser and curiouser!

Not curious - See Hollis_f's explanation below.

hollis_f wrote in post #16529826 (external link)
Raw files ignore Picture Styles except for creation of the embedded jpeg. The fact that ICE shows colours means that it is using the raw data.

So now the interesting question is - what parameters does it use to 'develop' the image from the raw data?

It uses a "standard setting" similar to the standard profile Adobe Lightroom or CameraRaw will apply to the image. The standard settings come from the Microsoft Camera Codec Pack - in fact, if you opened a photo in the MS Gallery apps, they should look the same as in ICE. (If not, that would be curious as they use the same tech.)


5D MK II AF Satisfaction Poll | Reduced Kit List
A Basic Guide to Photographyexternal link | Websiteexternal link
Flickrexternal link | Artflakesexternal link | Blurbexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

10,017 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Microsoft ICE work with RAW files? LR workflow?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1128 guests, 157 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.