Yeah, that branch on the side maybe screwed up the focus.
I got some better lit Eagle shots today, with pretty damn good detail. I need to process em yet,but I just starred the ones I liked so far in lightroom.
Kickflipkid687 Goldmember 1,074 posts Likes: 151 Joined Jan 2014 More info | Yeah, that branch on the side maybe screwed up the focus. My Flickr page - https://www.flickr.com/photos/86957042@N07/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Snydremark my very own Lightrules moment More info | Looking forward to today's results with better light. I'm jealous that you got to go out and play - Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Snydremark my very own Lightrules moment More info | Jan 20, 2014 20:25 | #363 Kickflipkid687 wrote in post #16621777  That looks alot better than mine, probably because of exposure, and maybe focus and Fstop too. Mines cropped quite a bit more however, but I still think this would resolve better. So, cropped in more:  I wouldn't really say it resolves any better...ISO was just too high to maintain much detail, IMO. The tradeoff is to lose detail to NR or to noise <shrug> - Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 20, 2014 20:32 | #364 Snydremark wrote in post #16622443 So, cropped in more: I wouldn't really say it resolves any better...ISO was just too high to maintain much detail, IMO. The tradeoff is to lose detail to NR or to noise <shrug> Here's a good resource you may want to look at. Specifically dealing with the influence of diffraction. _
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Snydremark my very own Lightrules moment More info | That's a nice link, David...but the shot above was wide open at f/6.3. Diffraction wasn't the problem here; noise, NR and hard cropping are - Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Kickflipkid687 Goldmember 1,074 posts Likes: 151 Joined Jan 2014 More info | That crop still looks pretty nice. My Flickr page - https://www.flickr.com/photos/86957042@N07/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Itsed65 Cream of the Crop  More info | Took mine up to the Colusa and Sacramento NWR's today to see how this glass worked on my 5d3. I wouldn't trade my 400 5.6 for it, as the auto focus is quite a bit slower, but sill, I got some pretty decent results.  Tamron test 20 by lennycarl08, on FlickrFuji XT-2, XT-3, Sony A1, A7RIV, A9, and an OM-1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MCAsan Goldmember  3,918 posts Likes: 88 Joined Jun 2010 Location: Atlanta More info |
jacobsen1 Cream of the Crop  9,629 posts Likes: 32 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Mt View, RI More info | I'm waiting for the moon to come out from behind the clouds. Boring subject I know, but a decent test subject... My Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Snydremark my very own Lightrules moment More info | Well, that's pretty hard to f'in argue with! - Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Snydremark my very own Lightrules moment More info | Jan 20, 2014 22:45 | #371 jacobsen1 wrote in post #16622748 I'm waiting for the moon to come out from behind the clouds. Boring subject I know, but a decent test subject... LOL! I'm finishing a show and heading out to go try the same this evening - Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife
LOG IN TO REPLY |
-AP- Goldmember  More info | Jan 20, 2014 23:37 | #372 MCAsan wrote in post #16622744 Sharp and it can focus also. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uu0FqNdl8Q0 Thank you for taking the time to put this video together. Well done.. WEBSITE
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Paulstw Senior Member 827 posts Likes: 2 Joined Nov 2012 More info | Interesting as it seems to be a lot of stationary subjects apart from the flying Bald Eagle. However, is it safe to say that the focus isn't very quick? I guess it's not going to be a very good BIF lens? Unless the bird is huge of course and a slow flyer.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Snydremark my very own Lightrules moment More info | My trials with the moon. The moon came out well this evening, but was low and pollution is high (hence the yellow; kept because that's what it looked like<shrug>  Tamron 150-600 @ 600, f/8, 1/8, ISO 100; imported in LR and exported, no other work:  Canon 100-400 @ 400, f/11, 1/15, ISO 400; imported in LR and exported, no other editing:  Tamron 150-600 @ 600mm, f/11, 1/8s , ISO 200 [Because I'm a chump and mucked the settings when changing lenses]; imported in LR and exported, no other editing:  Editing and cropping to same proportion in frame: Canon @ 400, f/8:  Tamron @ 600, f/8:  and stopped down: Canon @ 400, f/11:  Tamron @ 600, f/11:  To me, at least, it seems to hold up quite well. I'll have to try again, later, when it's up a bit higher and the atmosphere isn't clogged with crap. EDIT: One note I feel I should include here given the similarity in the results; the Tamron results in a significantly larger file, with much more data, for printing and such (3757x2505 [T] vs 2481x1654 [C] in the f/8 shots). - Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife
LOG IN TO REPLY |
5D3ismydream Member 160 posts Joined Jan 2014 More info |  Permanent banIf this lens be rated well, I may get it by end of summer this year
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1621 guests, 139 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
.