Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 16 Dec 2013 (Monday) 13:31
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Family/newborn shots

 
JoseCanseco
Senior Member
Avatar
689 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 151
Joined Dec 2012
Location: ON, Canada
     
Dec 16, 2013 13:31 |  #1

This was my first time shooting someone other than my own family.

Both shot on T4i with 40mm pancake
#1 is natural light, #2 was with flash through umbrella

I’m still fairly new to photography, but even newer to photoshop. Baby had the typical newborn blotchy skin, so I was trying to find balance between evening and smoothing it out, without losing all the texture and making him look porcelain (mom got some skin smoothing as well). Did I overdo it?

Critiques on any other areas are definitely welcome as well.

IMAGE: http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5536/11343894306_8d526265b0_c.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …76068277@N04/11​343894306/  (external link)
Anthony 4x6 (external link) by joecubed (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2841/11343933164_6e73647fc2_c.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …76068277@N04/11​343933164/  (external link)
Anthony Kiss - BW 5x7 (external link) by joecubed (external link), on Flickr

My name is Jeff, not actually Jose Canseco.
Website (external link) Facebook (external link) Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jetcode
Cream of the Crop
6,235 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2009
Location: West Marin
     
Dec 16, 2013 14:06 |  #2
bannedPermanently

#2 is your bread and butter. #1 OK but the surroundings and composition are a little weak. #2 spot your images!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JoseCanseco
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
689 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 151
Joined Dec 2012
Location: ON, Canada
     
Dec 16, 2013 14:54 |  #3

jetcode wrote in post #16532036 (external link)
#2 is your bread and butter. #1 OK but the surroundings and composition are a little weak. #2 spot your images!

Thanks so much for the comments, I agree about #1's comp. What do you mean by 'spot your images'?


My name is Jeff, not actually Jose Canseco.
Website (external link) Facebook (external link) Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jetcode
Cream of the Crop
6,235 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2009
Location: West Marin
     
Dec 16, 2013 16:52 |  #4
bannedPermanently

sometimes images may have small blemishes. in this particular case there is a very small white line running contrary to the hair on the baby near the mother. it could be dust on the sensor.

yup. it's nit picky for sure.

For historical context when darkroom printing was in her glory days dust on a negative or paper would be seen as a black or white spec, line, etc. The printer had to "spot" the prints before presenting them. If you go the analog film users thread in the lounge you will occasionally see film images with lots of dust from scans. The photographer did not spot the print.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JoseCanseco
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
689 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 151
Joined Dec 2012
Location: ON, Canada
     
Dec 16, 2013 20:58 |  #5

jetcode wrote in post #16532492 (external link)
sometimes images may have small blemishes. in this particular case there is a very small white line running contrary to the hair on the baby near the mother. it could be dust on the sensor.

It's actually a tiny thread or piece of fabric from his blanket. I didn't notice it until the very end when I converted to b&w. I didn't have time to go back, but I'm going to use this image to practice in PS. The removal tool in LR wasn't doing the trick.

yup. it's nit picky for sure.

Nit picky is great! I really appreciate your feedback and need to get thinking more about the small details.

For historical context when darkroom printing was in her glory days dust on a negative or paper would be seen as a black or white spec, line, etc. The printer had to "spot" the prints before presenting them. If you go the analog film users thread in the lounge you will occasionally see film images with lots of dust from scans. The photographer did not spot the print.

Very cool, I wasn't familiar with the expression, thanks so much for sharing.


My name is Jeff, not actually Jose Canseco.
Website (external link) Facebook (external link) Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Dec 18, 2013 10:26 |  #6

Post #4: Baby Photography


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JoseCanseco
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
689 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 151
Joined Dec 2012
Location: ON, Canada
     
Dec 18, 2013 13:54 |  #7

PhotosGuy wrote in post #16536880 (external link)
Post #4: Baby Photography

Thanks Frank. Checked your post and the links in that link, lots of good info there. I had Seona's thread bookmarked, I'll add that other link as well. Thanks for sharing!


My name is Jeff, not actually Jose Canseco.
Website (external link) Facebook (external link) Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
yilmaz
Mostly Lurking
Avatar
13 posts
Joined Nov 2013
Location: Famagusta, Cyprus
     
Dec 18, 2013 15:22 |  #8

I would like to comment for retouching. I think you should do it less.
The baby's skin does not look real.
This is just my taste. if you had the originals as well we could comment it better.


Canon 5D MK III | Canon 24-105 F4.0L IS | Canon 70-200 F2.8L IS II | Canon 600EX-RT | Canon ST E3-RT
web: http://photovideocypru​s.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JoseCanseco
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
689 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 151
Joined Dec 2012
Location: ON, Canada
     
Dec 18, 2013 18:31 |  #9

yilmaz wrote in post #16537667 (external link)
I would like to comment for retouching. I think you should do it less.
The baby's skin does not look real.
This is just my taste. if you had the originals as well we could comment it better.

That's exactly what I was questioning with the original post... I'm still learning to find balance and keeping things smooth but realistic. Appreciate your input.

Baby's mom had asked if I could do anything about his patchy red skin, but as you said, maybe I overdid it. Mom and dad were both very happy with the images I gave them, and for my experience/skill level, I'm happy with them... but now it's time to learn from them and improve on them.

Here are the originals:

IMAGE: http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5547/11442804073_ae8f41d919_b.jpg

IMAGE: http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5540/11442803423_dd77d4ed64_b.jpg

My name is Jeff, not actually Jose Canseco.
Website (external link) Facebook (external link) Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JoseCanseco
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
689 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 151
Joined Dec 2012
Location: ON, Canada
     
Dec 18, 2013 18:45 |  #10

For the skin smoothing, I brushed the Surface Blur filter, followed by a high pass filter to bring some texture back. I've found a number of techniques through google and youtube tutorials... it seems like Photoshop has 100 ways to reach the same goal, so I'm not sure if I chose the best technique for the job here.


My name is Jeff, not actually Jose Canseco.
Website (external link) Facebook (external link) Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JoseCanseco
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
689 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 151
Joined Dec 2012
Location: ON, Canada
     
Dec 23, 2013 11:38 |  #11

No takers for editing the originals? Like I mentioned, this was my first time shooting someone other than my own family, so I'm just looking for any tips on skin smoothing, eyes and any other pp stuff.

Here's another shot from that day:

IMAGE: http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3684/11517578583_ee8986e0ce_c.jpg

And the original:
IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7457/11517482504_c96a7cbc55_c.jpg

My name is Jeff, not actually Jose Canseco.
Website (external link) Facebook (external link) Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,597 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Family/newborn shots
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
560 guests, 142 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.