Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 28 Dec 2013 (Saturday) 11:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Calibration and Brightness

 
D ­ Thompson
Goldmember
Avatar
4,059 posts
Likes: 415
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Georgetown, Ky
     
Dec 29, 2013 16:37 as a reply to  @ post 16562440 |  #16

If your prints match what you see on screen then I'd leave it alone and not get hung up on the number.


Dennis
Canon 5D Mk III 5D 20D
I have not yet begun to procrastinate!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sin ­ City ­ Stan
Member
99 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2013
Location: Henderson. NV
     
Dec 29, 2013 17:22 |  #17

FWIW I just bought the Spyder4 package a couple months ago and remember rather well the first calibration I did. The brightness was noticeably increased by this calibration program. Photos from Whitehouse and Bay Photo both came back with excellent results. A calibration system was one of my best investments.


Sin City Stan
Canon 6D & 5D3 EF24-70L 2.8 EF17-40L 4.0 EF70-300L 4.0 EF50 1.8
Yongnuo YN-560 II, 565 EX & Canon 430 EX
http://creationsbysinc​itystan.smugmug.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bob_A
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,744 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 203
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Alberta, Canada
     
Dec 29, 2013 19:32 |  #18

YankeeMom wrote in post #16562440 (external link)
Wow, that's so low. Glad for my histogram. ;)

11% for a Dell is pretty normal for a Dell monitor when it's new. As it ages you need to creep it up a bit, maybe to 15-18% after a couple of years use.

Out of the box Dell's (actually, all monitors) have the brightness set way too high for photo editing. The better calibration devices/monitors lock out the button controls and let you calibrate to a luminance setting in cd/m^2. Depending on your room brightness it should be between 90-110 (some folks on POTN seem to even target 80-85, which is too low for my taste).

A target luminance of 100 on my NEC PA Series monitor closely matches a brightness setting of 15% on my Dell IPS monitor.


Bob
SmugMug (external link) | My Gear Ratings | My POTN Gallery

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
YankeeMom
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,120 posts
Gallery: 312 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 470
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Wisconsin
     
Dec 30, 2013 10:02 |  #19

Thanks for all the great advice, everyone! I lowered mine a bit, but I generally get good results with prints, so I'm going to pay extra attention to that and see if improvement is necessary.


Kristin
Mom to 11 ~ Still sane and rocking my Canon 5DMkII.
Calibrated with Spyder 4
Website (external link)
| Blog (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link) | 500px (external link) | Pinterest (external link) | Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 570
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Dec 31, 2013 13:20 |  #20

YankeeMom wrote in post #16562318 (external link)
Well, it says 75 on the brightness level of my monitor (I have a Dell Ultra Sharp U2312HM.) I assume that meant %?

My practice is that with a new monitor I lower the brightness right off the bat.

And then the "acid test" is getting prints made from a reliable print provider.

That to me is the only way of ensuring that my images will have a decent "presentation" in whatever media!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
Dec 31, 2013 13:27 |  #21

I agree with Tony, except that my "acid test" is prints from my own home printer.


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Spittle
Hatchling
1 post
Joined Jun 2014
     
Jun 17, 2014 17:03 as a reply to  @ Lowner's post |  #22

To rekindle this thread - I have a Dell ultrasharp U3014 monitor. I have calibrated using a colormunki photo: ambient lighting measured to be about 80 which required lowering the brightness to 12.

I'm experiencing problems with falloff and after doing some research I've read that these monitors only produce a constant (non falloff) brightness across the panel with brightness set to around 50.

Anyone have any experience with this?
My U3011 doesn't appear to have this problem.

Thanks




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,497 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
Calibration and Brightness
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
503 guests, 138 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.