Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
Thread started 29 Dec 2013 (Sunday) 11:33
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

What happened to my photos?

 
dcsmith40D
Senior Member
Avatar
543 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Atlanta
     
Dec 29, 2013 11:33 |  #1

I took pictures at a family gathering yesterday. I hate the way the pictures came out.

I've been using this camera for 4 or 5 years; you would thing that I would be answering questions not asking.

I took them with my 40D, 24-70, 580 EXII

The one with the bigger group is probably the best of the bunch. The focus just doesn't seem to be right. I want to blame the flash. I think it would have been better with just natural light.

The first one: 1/125, 3.5, iso 250

The Second: 1/60, 4.5, iso 250

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2013/12/5/LQ_672313.jpg
Image hosted by forum (672313) © dcsmith40D [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2013/12/5/LQ_672315.jpg
Image hosted by forum (672315) © dcsmith40D [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Canon 40D; 50 f1.8, 70-200 f2.8 IS L, 580 EX II, 1.4 TC, 24-70 f2.8 L, (2) 430 EX II

David

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RandyMN
Goldmember
3,131 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2005
     
Dec 29, 2013 11:45 |  #2

Using flash would be no reason for any focus issues and in this case most likely helped fill in shadows caused by hats, etc. It's possible your subjects were moving and the focus issue is actually a blurring issue from motion. Possibly it was even your movement of the camera during exposure.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
OhLook
insufferably pedantic. I can live with that.
Avatar
24,850 posts
Gallery: 105 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 16236
Joined Dec 2012
Location: California: SF Bay Area
     
Dec 29, 2013 11:51 |  #3

In #1 the background is sharper than the people. If you used autofocus, it may have locked onto the space between two subjects' heads.


PRONOUN ADVISORY: OhLook is a she. | A FEW CORRECT SPELLINGS: lens, aperture, amateur, hobbyist, per se, raccoon, whoa | Comments welcome

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5573
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Dec 29, 2013 11:55 |  #4

Yeah, the first one looks like af grabbed the trees; second one looks like camera shake, to me.


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dcsmith40D
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
543 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Atlanta
     
Dec 29, 2013 12:02 |  #5

Thanks for your response.

This one the camera is on a table with the timer to trigger. Me in the picture on the right.

1/60 aperture value 4.5, 250 iso

I tend to stay in the lower aperture value range for some reason. I think it is because I paid extra for 2.8 and question way I would stop down. I wondered if that was my problem?

Or is my high priced lens out of calibration?

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2013/12/5/LQ_672320.jpg
Image hosted by forum (672320) © dcsmith40D [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Canon 40D; 50 f1.8, 70-200 f2.8 IS L, 580 EX II, 1.4 TC, 24-70 f2.8 L, (2) 430 EX II

David

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5573
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Dec 29, 2013 13:18 |  #6

You paid for 2.8 so it would be available when you need it for low light shooting or narrow depth of field, neither of which is necessary in this sort of a shoot; definitely want to stop down more for these sorts of things. That said, something looks off here, still; where is your focus point?


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dcsmith40D
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
543 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Atlanta
     
Dec 29, 2013 13:30 |  #7

I always focus with the center focus dot then recompose. On the group, I think I just aimed at the center of group making sure not to focus past the group to the trees.


Canon 40D; 50 f1.8, 70-200 f2.8 IS L, 580 EX II, 1.4 TC, 24-70 f2.8 L, (2) 430 EX II

David

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
OhLook
insufferably pedantic. I can live with that.
Avatar
24,850 posts
Gallery: 105 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 16236
Joined Dec 2012
Location: California: SF Bay Area
     
Dec 29, 2013 13:36 |  #8

1/60 might be too long an exposure to expect that many people to hold still enough. They'd already frozen for the time it took you to run out front and take your place in the frame.

4.5 with two-plus rows of subjects, maybe the DoF was too shallow to get clarity on the four in front and the others behind them. There must be three or four feet separating the faces of the two men in back from the faces of the people kneeling.

Or else those camouflage uniforms work really, really well . . .


PRONOUN ADVISORY: OhLook is a she. | A FEW CORRECT SPELLINGS: lens, aperture, amateur, hobbyist, per se, raccoon, whoa | Comments welcome

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5573
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Dec 29, 2013 13:48 |  #9

dcsmith40D wrote in post #16562046 (external link)
I always focus with the center focus dot then recompose. On the group, I think I just aimed at the center of group making sure not to focus past the group to the trees.

Right; my concern was which person you focused on. There are a lot of solid colors in there that might not allow focus to lock properly. That camo may baffle it pretty good, too.


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dcsmith40D
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
543 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Atlanta
     
Dec 29, 2013 13:52 |  #10

It may very well have been the camo on the tall guy that I focused on.


Canon 40D; 50 f1.8, 70-200 f2.8 IS L, 580 EX II, 1.4 TC, 24-70 f2.8 L, (2) 430 EX II

David

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5573
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Dec 30, 2013 01:11 |  #11

Pick a face to focus on when shooting a group like that; you'll have better lines/contrast for the AF system to grab a hold of. See if that makes a difference with the next time you do a shoot like that.


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dcsmith40D
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
543 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Atlanta
     
Dec 30, 2013 14:14 |  #12

I will do it. I got a lazy and didn't think about it making a difference. Thanks for the responses.


Canon 40D; 50 f1.8, 70-200 f2.8 IS L, 580 EX II, 1.4 TC, 24-70 f2.8 L, (2) 430 EX II

David

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,901 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
What happened to my photos?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
953 guests, 182 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.