So I fell into a steal of a deal on a Tamron SP 90mm Macro today. I already have the Canon 100mm 2.8 non-USM (first version) macro, which I like. I also have the Canon 85mm 1.8 (which I'll hold on to for now). Between the two macros, which would you say is a better lens, and why? I have zero need for two macro lenses, so one will be finding a new home.
Both are 1:1, both are f/2.8. Tamron is smaller, lighter, and quieter. AF seems a bit faster on the Tamron. Both are in near mint condition, except the Canon has lost it's AF/MF switch, but that hasn't bothered me, as a fingernail works just fine. I don't have the time right now to do significant head-to-head comparisons, so I'm hoping maybe you guys/gals can offer some insight. Thanks!





