Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 29 Dec 2013 (Sunday) 16:25
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Tamron 90mm or Canon 100mm?

 
KirkS518
Goldmember
Avatar
3,983 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Central Gulf Coast, Flori-duh
     
Dec 29, 2013 16:25 |  #1

So I fell into a steal of a deal on a Tamron SP 90mm Macro today. I already have the Canon 100mm 2.8 non-USM (first version) macro, which I like. I also have the Canon 85mm 1.8 (which I'll hold on to for now). Between the two macros, which would you say is a better lens, and why? I have zero need for two macro lenses, so one will be finding a new home.

Both are 1:1, both are f/2.8. Tamron is smaller, lighter, and quieter. AF seems a bit faster on the Tamron. Both are in near mint condition, except the Canon has lost it's AF/MF switch, but that hasn't bothered me, as a fingernail works just fine. I don't have the time right now to do significant head-to-head comparisons, so I'm hoping maybe you guys/gals can offer some insight. Thanks!


If steroids are illegal for athletes, should PS be illegal for models?
Digital - 50D, 20D IR Conv, 9 Lenses from 8mm to 300mm
Analog - Mamiya RB67 Pro-SD, Canon A-1, Nikon F4S, YashicaMat 124G, Rollei 35S, QL17 GIII, Zeiss Ikon Ikoflex 1st Version, and and entire room full of lenses and other stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
majix
Senior Member
Avatar
395 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 86
Joined Aug 2013
Location: Plano TX
     
Dec 29, 2013 16:30 |  #2

canon is sharper
http://www.the-digital-picture.com …omp=0&FLIComp=0​&APIComp=0 (external link)


Majid flickr (external link)
Facebook (external link)
http://www.mjdpic.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
watt100
Cream of the Crop
14,021 posts
Likes: 34
Joined Jun 2008
     
Dec 29, 2013 17:33 |  #3

actually that's at different focal lengths, try it with the same focal length

sites like http://www.photozone.d​e (external link) rate the Tamron 90 2.8 macro and Canon 100 2.8 macro the same in resolution and sharpness

if prices were the same, sure I'd take the Canon but the old original non-di version of the Tamron 90mm 2.8 macro is pretty good and cheap ($200 used)


60D
Tamron 90mm 2.8 macro non-di
f6.3
ISO 800


IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7381/11404051264_ac10956f8e_c.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KirkS518
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,983 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Central Gulf Coast, Flori-duh
     
Dec 29, 2013 17:43 |  #4

The Tamron is the non-Di version. The Canon is the non-USM version, which TDP doesn't have in their comparison tool.

I have used the Canon for portraits, and have been happy with it for that genre. How should the Tamron fair?

This is really a tougher decision than you would think....


If steroids are illegal for athletes, should PS be illegal for models?
Digital - 50D, 20D IR Conv, 9 Lenses from 8mm to 300mm
Analog - Mamiya RB67 Pro-SD, Canon A-1, Nikon F4S, YashicaMat 124G, Rollei 35S, QL17 GIII, Zeiss Ikon Ikoflex 1st Version, and and entire room full of lenses and other stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
1Tanker
Goldmember
Avatar
4,470 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Swaying to the Symphony of Destruction
     
Dec 29, 2013 17:49 as a reply to  @ KirkS518's post |  #5

Not a tough decision. If you're going to sell the unneeded lens, sell the Tamron.

Although it might not bother you, not having the AF/MF switch on the Canon will hurt it's resale value. Keep it.. and keep living with the lack of a switch. ;)

IQ issues between similar FL/aperture macro lenses are largely irrelevant.


Kel
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
watt100
Cream of the Crop
14,021 posts
Likes: 34
Joined Jun 2008
     
Dec 29, 2013 17:59 |  #6

KirkS518 wrote in post #16562578 (external link)
The Tamron is the non-Di version. The Canon is the non-USM version, which TDP doesn't have in their comparison tool.

I have used the Canon for portraits, and have been happy with it for that genre. How should the Tamron fair?

This is really a tougher decision than you would think....

the Tamron works fine for portraits but it's not a difficult decision, the Canon has a shorter minimum focusing distance and if it works and price is not important I would choose the Canon


60D
Tamron 90mm 2.8 macro non-di
f2.8
iso 800

IMAGE: http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3705/10695445526_31aa1558a5_c.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vengence
Goldmember
2,103 posts
Likes: 108
Joined Mar 2013
     
Dec 29, 2013 18:53 |  #7

Wait if they're both one to one, how does the canon have a shorter min focus distance if the Tamron is a 90mm?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KirkS518
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,983 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Central Gulf Coast, Flori-duh
     
Dec 29, 2013 20:48 |  #8

The Canon's MFD is 0.31m, and the Tamron's MFD is 0.29m.


If steroids are illegal for athletes, should PS be illegal for models?
Digital - 50D, 20D IR Conv, 9 Lenses from 8mm to 300mm
Analog - Mamiya RB67 Pro-SD, Canon A-1, Nikon F4S, YashicaMat 124G, Rollei 35S, QL17 GIII, Zeiss Ikon Ikoflex 1st Version, and and entire room full of lenses and other stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vengence
Goldmember
2,103 posts
Likes: 108
Joined Mar 2013
     
Dec 29, 2013 22:27 |  #9

That's what I figured. IMHO, I'll always pick the longer macro lens because of the longer minimum focus distance.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jgood122
Senior Member
Avatar
263 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 39
Joined Dec 2013
Location: Knoxville, TN
     
Dec 29, 2013 22:31 |  #10

i asked the same question as i was looking for a macro lens and the poll i offered the canon blew the tamron and sigma lens away for what the people would choose. so i decided on the 100mm


Jason
Canon T3i, Nifty Fifty, 18-55mm kit lens, 24-105mm f/4L, Tamron 70-300mm, 100mm f/2.8L IS USM, Rokinon 14mm
Website (external link)
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KirkS518
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,983 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Central Gulf Coast, Flori-duh
     
Dec 29, 2013 23:47 |  #11

I've decided that since I have both, and I'm really in no rush to decide, I'm going to do a head to head comparison.

As the Canon is the NON USM, and the Tamron is the NON Di, I'm having a difficult time finding good info out there. Lots about the USM and the Di versions, but not these two.

I'll try and do something similar to what Talley did as far as the comparisons go. Any suggestions on subject, etc? I'll be shooting on tripod, MLU, 10 sec timer, same exposure settings. Should be a fun project.


If steroids are illegal for athletes, should PS be illegal for models?
Digital - 50D, 20D IR Conv, 9 Lenses from 8mm to 300mm
Analog - Mamiya RB67 Pro-SD, Canon A-1, Nikon F4S, YashicaMat 124G, Rollei 35S, QL17 GIII, Zeiss Ikon Ikoflex 1st Version, and and entire room full of lenses and other stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gnome ­ chompski
Goldmember
1,252 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 136
Joined Jun 2013
Location: oakland, ca
     
Dec 30, 2013 01:05 |  #12

jgood122 wrote in post #16563238 (external link)
i asked the same question as i was looking for a macro lens and the poll i offered the canon blew the tamron and sigma lens away for what the people would choose. so i decided on the 100mm

LOL at a poll. A poll doesnt mean a thing. FWIW, most of the current macro's from Canon, Tamron and Sigma are about equal in terms of image quality. I personally tested both Canons and the new Tamron 90mm before deciding on the Tamron. But rest assured, all produce stellar images when used correctly


Tumblr (external link)
Flickr (external link)
Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scorpio_e
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,402 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 264
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Pa
     
Jan 26, 2014 19:39 |  #13

Just picked the Tamron so far I am impressed.


www.steelcityphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KirkS518
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,983 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Central Gulf Coast, Flori-duh
     
Jan 26, 2014 19:40 |  #14

scorpio_e wrote in post #16639478 (external link)
Just picked the Tamron so far I am impressed.

Hmm. Wonder if you bought it from me off ebay? :)

I liked the Tamron, but liked the feel of the Canon better. IQ between the two was nearly impossible to tell.


If steroids are illegal for athletes, should PS be illegal for models?
Digital - 50D, 20D IR Conv, 9 Lenses from 8mm to 300mm
Analog - Mamiya RB67 Pro-SD, Canon A-1, Nikon F4S, YashicaMat 124G, Rollei 35S, QL17 GIII, Zeiss Ikon Ikoflex 1st Version, and and entire room full of lenses and other stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scorpio_e
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,402 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 264
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Pa
     
Jan 26, 2014 19:58 |  #15

Actually picked it up on Amazon. Ebay sellers were from Korea.


www.steelcityphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,507 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Tamron 90mm or Canon 100mm?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1053 guests, 104 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.