Acura RL **56K Warning!** -- Transportation in photography-on-the.net forums

Goldmember

1,798 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: New York

More info

Feb 04, 2006 08:49 | #1

Acura RL
70-200 f/4L

I really wish I had this car!
I didn't have my wide-angle with me so getting the whole car in the frame was very very difficult. I only like #2 to be honest.

Please post your thoughts! Thanks!

You can view all of the photos here: http://photo.calzinger.net …BrowseCategory.php&cat=18

[IMG tags removed from photos. Too many per post/thread.]

"That building in the background is distracting."
"Oh OK, I'll move it out of the way next time."
internet forum fail

LIKES 0

BIGTUFFGUY

Goldmember

2,252 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Montreal, Canada

More info

Feb 04, 2006 10:18 | #2

beautiful car, although it would have been nicer had someone washed it.

the photos are nice. the kit lens does produce nice photos. i would have stepped back and tried to fill the frame more.

Gear List + Feedback

LIKES 0

Calzinger
THREAD STARTER

Goldmember

1,798 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: New York

More info

Feb 04, 2006 10:22 as a reply to @ BIGTUFFGUY's post | #3

BIGTUFFGUY wrote:
beautiful car, although it would have been nicer had someone washed it.

the photos are nice. the kit lens does produce nice photos. i would have stepped back and tried to fill the frame more.

Thanks. Yes, the car was dirty as could be (as shown in #1).

I didn't have my kit lens on hand so I couldn't get the wide shots that I was really looking forward to. I tried my best to get the whole car in the frame, but at 70mm, I still couldn't fit it even 10m away.That's really why #2 is my favorite since you can actually see the whole car. I think it's also the angle though.

"That building in the background is distracting."
"Oh OK, I'll move it out of the way next time."
internet forum fail

LIKES 0

StevenRaith

Senior Member

575 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Welwyn Garden City, Herts, UK.

More info

Feb 04, 2006 10:30 | #4

Pff, thats not dirty.

Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

Thats dirty

Nice pics tho - although I'd debate the beatiful point, looks like a generic late 90's early 00s saloon. Some nice detailing mind.

Like the rear tail light shot - if the car was properly dirty it could have been titled as a battlescarred workhorse

Dirty cars are correct

LIKES 0

Jump to forum... • Rules • Forums • New posts • RTAT • 'Best of' • Gallery • Gear • Reviews • Member list • Polls • Image rules • Search • Password reset • Home

Not a member yet?

Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

THEME: Paper White | Darker
MARGINS: (this page: defaults)

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1498 guests, 97 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.

	x 1600
	y 1600