About to upgrade my 600D for a 70D for an African Safari in August.
Looking at getting the Canon 100 to 400mm L lens, is the Canon lens the best way to go
or should I be looking at Sigma or Tamron?
Any advice appreciated! Thanks.
HARTE Mostly Lurking 12 posts Likes: 5 Joined Nov 2013 More info | Jan 02, 2014 01:14 | #1 About to upgrade my 600D for a 70D for an African Safari in August.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
artyman Sleepless in Hampshire More info | Jan 02, 2014 03:30 | #2 The Sigma 150-500 or the IS version of the Sigma 50-500 would be suitable alternatives. The Canon though is a bit lighter and that may be a consideration for a safari. Art that takes you there. http://www.artyman.co.uk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 02, 2014 16:56 | #3 artyman wrote in post #16570996 The Sigma 150-500 or the IS version of the Sigma 50-500 would be suitable alternatives. The Canon though is a bit lighter and that may be a consideration for a safari. I have the 100-400 and 400 5.6 prime.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JeffreyG "my bits and pieces are all hard" More info | Jan 02, 2014 16:59 | #4 I've seen a few guys that have done the safari thing, and they usually say to get a zoom as you cannot always predict how close an opportunity will be. And the 100-400L is one of the most recommended for this. My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/photos/jngirbach/sets/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 02, 2014 17:04 | #5 Always found this review interesting from a reviewer on an African Safari:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
timbop Goldmember More info | Jan 02, 2014 17:48 | #6 The #1 choice for image quality, price, and flexibility is the 100-400 for sure. I owned a 400/5.6, and have tested various other lenses and the 100-400 is still the lens I prefer when I shoot wildlife. Current: 5DM3, 6D, 8mm fish, 24-105/4IS, 35/2IS, 70-200/2.8IS, 85/1.8, 100-400/IS v1, lensbaby composer with edge 80, 580's and AB800's
LOG IN TO REPLY |
flyingbarron Senior Member More info | Jan 03, 2014 03:08 | #7 If you're talking about a long zoom then with the classic options (Sigma 150-500, Sigma 50-500, Canon 100-400) it's very simply: You start off with an excellent lens (150-500) and if you pay more, you get an even better one. 80D | EF-S 18-135 IS USM | EF-S 10-18 STM IS | EF-S 24 2.8 | EF 50 1.8 STM | 430EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EvanIdler Goldmember 1,600 posts Likes: 4 Joined May 2005 Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada More info | Jan 03, 2014 03:45 | #8 If you can afford it take a look at the Sigma 120-300 F/2.8 EX DG OS(Sport) and a set of Canon5DIII + Some L + Some non L + Some Sigma + Some Tamron + other stuff....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
freddyronny Senior Member 316 posts Joined Dec 2009 More info | Jan 03, 2014 07:11 | #9 Evan Idler wrote in post #16573749 If you can afford it take a look at the Sigma 120-300 F/2.8 EX DG OS(Sport) and a set of Sigma 1.4X and 2X transverses. It's a great lens, if you take the time to master it. --Evan +1 Canon EOS 70D / Canon Eos 450D / Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 / Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 OS / Canon 50mm f/1.8 II - Canon 18-55mm IS / Kenko Pro 300 1.4 DG / Sigma 2x APO DG / Canon 430 EX II Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Monkeytoes 1321 guests, 172 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||