Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 02 Jan 2014 (Thursday) 08:27
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

60D vs. 70D..... Worth upgrading?

 
Bill ­ Emmett
Member
201 posts
Likes: 10
Joined May 2012
Location: New Orleans, Louisiana
     
Jan 03, 2014 00:40 |  #16

The 60D, and good old 7D both are a little long on the tooth. I shoot mostly outdoors, in the bayous and fields in South Louisiana, so I'm waiting patiently for the new 7D II. From what I have read in Canon Rumors, the 7DII, or whatever they call it will be the new pro choice. It will have all the newest technology onboard. The 70D is new, and cutting edge, but I'm looking for a new birder with a higher burst rate, faster focus, and bigger buffer.


New Canon EOS 5D Mark IV, Canon EOS 7D Mark II, Canon EOS 50D, Canon 7D Classic, Canon 6D, Canon EF 70-200 f4L USM with IS, Canon 40mm pancake, Canon EF 50mm 1.8, Canon EF-S 10-22mm wide angle, Canon EF-S 18-135 IS STM, Canon EF 100mm 2.8L USM Macro, Tamron 18-270mm Dii VC, Tamron SP 150-600mm VC, Tamron SP 24-70mm f2.8 VC USM, Canon EF 16-35 f2.8L II USM, Tamron 2X Tele-Extender, 1.4 Tele-extender

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
watt100
Cream of the Crop
14,021 posts
Likes: 34
Joined Jun 2008
     
Jan 03, 2014 05:04 |  #17

reefvilla wrote in post #16571329 (external link)
I have a 60D now and I'm just kicking around the idea of jumping to the 70D. My main reason just from reading the description was the 70D's jump to the DIGIC 5+ processor and more pixels from the DIGIC 4 in the 60D.

Is there enough difference in picture detail to justify the upgrade?

.

seems the 70D owners say yes but I'm staying with the 60D for now




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DaveKosiba
Senior Member
Avatar
597 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 48
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Atlanta
     
Jan 03, 2014 17:55 |  #18

I made the upgrade from the 60D to the 70D, I looked at the 6D but could not justify the extra cost and replacing all my EF-S lenses.

I am happy with the upgrade (final cost difference being ~$450), I've only had the 70D for about a week now and have already used the following features I didn't have in the 60D:

1) Micro focus adjusted all my lenses.
2) Ability to set the minimum shutter speed in Av mode.
3) Additional AF points have been useful along with the dedicated AF control button.
4) Transmissive VF LCD with grid lines & on screen level.
5) Touch screen has been really helpful to quickly make adjustments.
6) Fast focusing in Live View mode. (Not done much video yet).
7) WiFi control with my cell phone.
8) Combined live view/video record button (so much better than having to turn the mode button).
9) Silent shutter mode.

Since I've been using all the new features of the 70D, I feel it has been a worthwhile upgrade for me. My only complaint is I need to re-learn the button layout on the back of the camera but I think it's better in the long run. Also, the top rotary knob is so much smoother, I know button feel is a subjective thing but it just makes the camera feel more expensive.


EOS 6D MkII, Tamron 24-70 2.8 VC, 85 1.8, 70-200L f/4 IS, 16-35 f/4L IS, 430 EXII, Luma Cinch Strap

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MakisM1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,775 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Likes: 553
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Jan 03, 2014 18:28 |  #19

DaveKosiba wrote in post #16575405 (external link)
Also, the top rotary knob is so much smoother, I know button feel is a subjective thing but it just makes the camera feel more expensive.

But... it is more expensive... :D

Congratulations! Tell us about MFAing the lenses. How much did it take? Did you feel you needed to calibrate the lenses when you had the previous camera?


Gerry
Canon R6 MkII/Canon 5D MkIII/Canon 60D/Canon EF-S 18-200/Canon EF 24-70L USM II/Canon EF 70-200L 2.8 USM II/Canon EF 50 f1.8 II/Σ 8-16/Σ 105ΕΧ DG/ 430 EXII
OS: Linux Ubuntu/PostProcessing: Darktable/Image Processing: GIMP

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DaveKosiba
Senior Member
Avatar
597 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 48
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Atlanta
     
Jan 03, 2014 19:15 |  #20

MakisM1 wrote in post #16575494 (external link)
But... it is more expensive... :D

Congratulations! Tell us about MFAing the lenses. How much did it take? Did you feel you needed to calibrate the lenses when you had the previous camera?

I guess it's still better than the clicky button I had on my 60D.

As for the MFA, used the Dot Tune method, completed the MFA on four lenses in about an hour. The concept is simple and sound, so far I don't seem to be missing focus on any of my lenses.


EOS 6D MkII, Tamron 24-70 2.8 VC, 85 1.8, 70-200L f/4 IS, 16-35 f/4L IS, 430 EXII, Luma Cinch Strap

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MakisM1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,775 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Likes: 553
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Jan 03, 2014 19:17 |  #21

DaveKosiba wrote in post #16575587 (external link)
I guess it's still better than the clicky button I had on my 60D.

As for the MFA, used the Dot Tune method, completed the MFA on four lenses in about an hour. The concept is simple and sound, so far I don't seem to be missing focus on any of my lenses.

So your lenses were pretty much spot on?


Gerry
Canon R6 MkII/Canon 5D MkIII/Canon 60D/Canon EF-S 18-200/Canon EF 24-70L USM II/Canon EF 70-200L 2.8 USM II/Canon EF 50 f1.8 II/Σ 8-16/Σ 105ΕΧ DG/ 430 EXII
OS: Linux Ubuntu/PostProcessing: Darktable/Image Processing: GIMP

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Jan 03, 2014 21:22 |  #22

MakisM1 wrote in post #16575594 (external link)
So your lenses were pretty much spot on?

That isn't how I read it. I read it as before and after.

DaveKosiba wrote in post #16575587 (external link)
I guess it's still better than the clicky button I had on my 60D.

As for the MFA, used the Dot Tune method, [BEFORE] completed the MFA on four lenses in about an hour. The concept is simple and sound, [AFTER] so far I don't seem to be missing focus on any of my lenses.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
artyH
Goldmember
2,118 posts
Likes: 32
Joined Aug 2009
     
Jan 03, 2014 21:45 |  #23

DaveKosiba wrote in post #16575405 (external link)
I made the upgrade from the 60D to the 70D, I looked at the 6D but could not justify the extra cost and replacing all my EF-S lenses.

I am happy with the upgrade (final cost difference being ~$450), I've only had the 70D for about a week now and have already used the following features I didn't have in the 60D:

1) Micro focus adjusted all my lenses.
2) Ability to set the minimum shutter speed in Av mode.
3) Additional AF points have been useful along with the dedicated AF control button.
4) Transmissive VF LCD with grid lines & on screen level.
5) Touch screen has been really helpful to quickly make adjustments.
6) Fast focusing in Live View mode. (Not done much video yet).
7) WiFi control with my cell phone.
8) Combined live view/video record button (so much better than having to turn the mode button).
9) Silent shutter mode.

Since I've been using all the new features of the 70D, I feel it has been a worthwhile upgrade for me. My only complaint is I need to re-learn the button layout on the back of the camera but I think it's better in the long run. Also, the top rotary knob is so much smoother, I know button feel is a subjective thing but it just makes the camera feel more expensive.

None of this would induce me to go to the 70D from my 60D. I only had one lens that really needed microadjust (85F1.8), and the replacement was ok. Of course, I could theoretically get more from my lenses if I had this feature, but I guess ignorance is bliss. I am waiting for the price of the 6D to come down a little more, as I could use the high ISO performance. If I get a 6D, I will be keeping the 60D.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DaveKosiba
Senior Member
Avatar
597 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 48
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Atlanta
     
Jan 03, 2014 22:19 |  #24

MakisM1 wrote in post #16575594 (external link)
So your lenses were pretty much spot on?

Nope, not spot on. MFA adjustments below:

70-200 f/4L: (W 0, T +10)
17-55 f/2.8: (W -4, T +5)
10-22 f/3.5-4.5: (W +1, T +5)
Sigma 30 f1.4: (+1)

artyH wrote in post #16575903 (external link)
None of this would induce me to go to the 70D from my 60D. I only had one lens that really needed microadjust (85F1.8), and the replacement was ok. Of course, I could theoretically get more from my lenses if I had this feature, but I guess ignorance is bliss. I am waiting for the price of the 6D to come down a little more, as I could use the high ISO performance. If I get a 6D, I will be keeping the 60D.

I agree that the upgrade is not huge, not everyone will use the extra features but the MFA and better AF system should increase my keep rate.


EOS 6D MkII, Tamron 24-70 2.8 VC, 85 1.8, 70-200L f/4 IS, 16-35 f/4L IS, 430 EXII, Luma Cinch Strap

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MakisM1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,775 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Likes: 553
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Jan 03, 2014 22:26 |  #25

DaveKosiba wrote in post #16575979 (external link)
Nope, not spot on. MFA adjustments below:

70-200 f/4L: (W 0, T +10)
17-55 f/2.8: (W -4, T +5)
10-22 f/3.5-4.5: (W +1, T +5)
Sigma 30 f1.4: (+1)

Wow! That's quite a bit!


Gerry
Canon R6 MkII/Canon 5D MkIII/Canon 60D/Canon EF-S 18-200/Canon EF 24-70L USM II/Canon EF 70-200L 2.8 USM II/Canon EF 50 f1.8 II/Σ 8-16/Σ 105ΕΧ DG/ 430 EXII
OS: Linux Ubuntu/PostProcessing: Darktable/Image Processing: GIMP

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mwsilver
Goldmember
4,103 posts
Gallery: 54 photos
Likes: 643
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Central New Jersey
     
Jan 04, 2014 14:47 |  #26

palad1n wrote in post #16571391 (external link)
70D differences :

-- slightly better ISO performance and much better noise characteristics

Have to disagree with you on that one. I have a 60D and have spent a lot of time with a friend's 70D lately. With the 70D I was able to get images with surprisingly low noise at ISO 6400. With the 60D ISO 6400 images are, for the most part, way too noisy to use. Further the 70D ISO 6400 images had much less noise than my 60D at 3200 and were not much noisier than the 60D as 1600! That's the better part of two stops improvement in sensitivity which is not slight IMHO. The better sensor with greatly improved ISO sensitivity, the MFA feature, the much improved Live View and the 19 point focusing system are just some of the many enhancement to the 70D. For some it would be a pricey but worthwhile upgrade and the prices will lightly fall a bit in the next 6-12 months. I'm not upgrading any time soon since I waiting for a 7D II which I hope will be released this Spring.


Mark
Nikon Z fc, Nikkor Z 16-50mm, Nikkor Z 40mm f/2, Nikkor Z 28mm f/2.8 (SE), Nikkor Z DX 18-140mm, Voigtlander 35mm f/1.2, Voigtlander 23mm f/1.2, DXO PhotoLab 5 Elite, DXO FilmPack 6 Elite, DXO ViewPoint 3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gabebalazs
Bird Whisperer
Avatar
7,643 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 1070
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Toledo, OH
     
Jan 04, 2014 15:13 |  #27

mwsilver wrote in post #16577464 (external link)
Have to disagree with you on that one. I have a 60D and have spent a lot of time with a friend's 70D lately. With the 70D I was able to get images with surprisingly low noise at ISO 6400. With the 60D ISO 6400 images are, for the most part, way too noisy to use. Further the 70D ISO 6400 images had much less noise than my 60D at 3200 and were not much noisier than the 60D as 1600! That's the better part of two stops improvement in sensitivity which is not slight IMHO. The better sensor with greatly improved ISO sensitivity, the MFA feature, the much improved Live View and the 19 point focusing system are just some of the many enhancement to the 70D. For some it would be a pricey but worthwhile upgrade and the prices will lightly fall a bit in the next 6-12 months. I'm not upgrading any time soon since I waiting for a 7D II which I hope will be released this Spring.

Mark, I'm sure Palad1n meant the difference is small in RAW, and he's right in that sense. A bit less noise and better noise characteristics. This also mirrors my experience and I've shared my results in a few topics here on the forum.

But in jpeg, yes the difference is big (due to 4 years of advances in processing speed and NR algorithms). But I'd say the majority of people shoot RAW (or at least RAW +jpeg) here for the best quality and flexible files. But yes, I also welcome the nice jpeg files from the 70D, they look really good at higher ISOs, much better than 7D or 60D.

(For the record I've owned the 60D, as well as T2i, T3i, T4i, and 7D, all of them featuring the 18mp Canon sensor, currently own the 7D and 70D. I've performed a ton of extremely controlled comparison tests between my 7D and 70D also and the results fit Palad1n's description.)


SONY A7RIII | SONY A7III | SONY RX10 IV | SONY RX100 | 24-70 2.8 GM | 70-200 2.8 GM | 16-35 F/4 | PZ 18-105 F/4 | FE 85 1.8 | FE 28-70 | SIGMA 35 1.4 ART | SIGMA 150-600 C | ROKINON 14 2.8
Gabe Balazs Photo (external link)
Nature Shots Portfolio (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lbsimon
...never exercised in my life
Avatar
2,685 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 272
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Boston, MA
     
Jan 04, 2014 16:43 |  #28

MakisM1 wrote in post #16575494 (external link)
But... it is more expensive... :D

Congratulations! Tell us about MFAing the lenses. How much did it take? Did you feel you needed to calibrate the lenses when you had the previous camera?

The question is not addressed to me, but... With the 60D I wished I could improve one lens, and I was totally happy with another. After getting a 70D and having the MFA done, I had no more complains, they both became very good. I ran the MFA on the remaining lenses as well, and even though I adjusted some of them a little, they could have stayed where they were.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MakisM1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,775 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Likes: 553
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Jan 04, 2014 17:02 |  #29

Thanks Lbsimon, good to know. I only had one lens with problems (my first EF 24-70 MkII) but Ithink that it had problems beyond what the MFA could fix, as it would go from front to back focus withing the focusing range (say from 2 ft to 10 ft) and it would go one way in 35 mm and another in 50 mm. Returned it for my current lens which is spot on!


Gerry
Canon R6 MkII/Canon 5D MkIII/Canon 60D/Canon EF-S 18-200/Canon EF 24-70L USM II/Canon EF 70-200L 2.8 USM II/Canon EF 50 f1.8 II/Σ 8-16/Σ 105ΕΧ DG/ 430 EXII
OS: Linux Ubuntu/PostProcessing: Darktable/Image Processing: GIMP

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lbsimon
...never exercised in my life
Avatar
2,685 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 272
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Boston, MA
     
Jan 04, 2014 17:07 |  #30

MakisM1 wrote in post #16577732 (external link)
Thanks Lbsimon, good to know. I only had one lens with problems (my first EF 24-70 MkII) but Ithink that it had problems beyond what the MFA could fix, as it would go from front to back focus withing the focusing range (say from 2 ft to 10 ft) and it would go one way in 35 mm and another in 50 mm. Returned it for my current lens which is spot on!

I just realized that I made a crucial mistake in my previous posting. I was completely unhappy with two lenses, not one. The Tamron went to the factory twice, and both time came back unsatisfactory. On the third time they said that there was absolutely no problem with the lens, and I was still unhappy. Only after buying the 70D and MFA'ing it to -11 it became practically perfect.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

9,405 views & 0 likes for this thread, 20 members have posted to it.
60D vs. 70D..... Worth upgrading?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1679 guests, 103 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.