Jan 03, 2014 15:51 | #1 Just saying.       To be honest, it's a good all around telephoto lens. It's super versatile. I eventually plan on buying it after I get a 70-200. To add to its awesomeness, it's also super lightweight. Oh, right, I forgot to mention that it's sharp as all hell too. Camera gear: Canon 5D Mark IV | Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L II | Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L II | Lights: Elinchrom Ranger RX Speed AS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Kanye Senior Member  670 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2013 Location: Seattle, WA More info | Jan 03, 2014 20:11 | #2 What's the EXIF on your first photo; looks a bit grainy.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 03, 2014 21:27 | #3 agreed. it's pretty awesome. and I love it when I think doh, I'm TOO close for this portrait because i'm used to the MFD of my 70-200, and then I realize, wait, its a MACRO. Let's go ever closer. cheese Body: Sony a7R IV
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 03, 2014 21:39 | #4 Kanye wrote in post #16575702 What's the EXIF on your first photo; looks a bit grainy. But yeah, 100mm F/2.8L IS is the master race of all primes. IS gives you better control; something that the 135mm f/2 will never have. It doesn't look grainy at 100%. I think it might just be Flickr.  I wish I had the macro to assist with those, haha. Camera gear: Canon 5D Mark IV | Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L II | Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L II | Lights: Elinchrom Ranger RX Speed AS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
A bit on the long end for all-round wedding pics in tight spaces.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 04, 2014 07:09 | #6 I really like mine. It goes on my camera just as everyone settles down to eat. I can wander around getting detail shots and its long enough to usually snap a quick shot of B&G if they do something interesting without a lens change. Made the Fuji Switch
LOG IN TO REPLY |
smorter Goldmember  4,506 posts Likes: 19 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Melbourne, Australia More info | Jan 04, 2014 12:23 | #7 I'm not a big fan of it myself, I feel it's a bit too long and slow for indoor stuff (where 50L and 85L are king) yet outdoors it's a bit too short (where 70-200 and 200L are king) Wedding Photography Melbourne
LOG IN TO REPLY |
eddie3dfx Senior Member 486 posts Likes: 3 Joined Sep 2009 More info | Probably very versatile for wedding photography, given it's a very good portrait lens, excellent macro lens for rings/up close shots, and has is. Canon 6D, Canon L 24-105, Zeiss Distagon 28mm 2.8, Planar 50mm 1.4, Planar 85mm 1.4, Sonnar 135mm 2.8 & Zeiss Mutar 2x, Canon 50mm 1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
moltengold Goldmember 4,296 posts Likes: 10 Joined Jul 2011 More info | Jan 04, 2014 16:18 | #9 smorter wrote in post #16577182 I'm not a big fan of it myself, I feel it's a bit too long and slow for indoor stuff (where 50L and 85L are king) yet outdoors it's a bit too short (where 70-200 and 200L are king) me too | Canon EOS | and some canon lenses
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1452 guests, 127 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
