That should work; but you're going to want a CPL in there, somewhere, as well, most likely
Snydremark my very own Lightrules moment More info | Jan 14, 2014 09:51 | #31 That should work; but you're going to want a CPL in there, somewhere, as well, most likely - Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 14, 2014 10:18 | #32 Snydremark wrote in post #16604594 That should work; but you're going to want a CPL in there, somewhere, as well, most likely Yea,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Snydremark my very own Lightrules moment More info | Jan 14, 2014 10:48 | #33 The problem you run into trying to adapt a screw-on CPL to the panel filters is that you're connecting two things that spin freely, which makes separating them nigh impossible at times... - Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife
LOG IN TO REPLY |
WaterVsAnchor Senior Member 372 posts Likes: 1 Joined May 2011 Location: Colorado More info | Jan 16, 2014 13:51 | #35 I feel your pain MalVeauX.. I want that Lee CPL as well but I just can't fit it into the budget anytime soon. It's the only piece of my Lee kit that I'm missing. Wish there was a decent alternative that was cheaper and easier to find. ---------------
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sirrith Cream of the Crop More info | Jan 16, 2014 19:12 | #36 I hope I'm not too late seeing this thread. If Lee is too expensive for you, you can get knockoffs for much less. -Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Snydremark my very own Lightrules moment More info | Jan 16, 2014 19:23 | #37 Sirrith wrote in post #16611612 I hope I'm not too late seeing this thread. If Lee is too expensive for you, you can get knockoffs for much less. http://www.ebay.com …-4X4-4X5-65-/160869791618 A comparison of the two holders (click on the images for captions): http://www.digitalrev.com/album?id=25115662 Filter-wise, Hitech are decent, but I had their pro-stop 10 stopper, and mine leaked a lot of IR, leading to a horrid red cast over my photos. I returned it. For my 10-stop, I decided to go the screw-in route, since it is much cheaper. I got the Haida Slim Pro II MC off ebay for under $50. It is very good for the price, there is a flickr set dedicated to it where you can see the results: http://www.flickr.com/groups/2184599@N23/ And here, I've shown how to do a DIY solution to using a regular CPL with the Lee-style holder: https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php?t=1285316 That's one helluva clever solution there, Tom. Hat's off to you on that one. - Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sirrith Cream of the Crop More info | Jan 16, 2014 19:54 | #38 Snydremark wrote in post #16611636 That's one helluva clever solution there, Tom. Hat's off to you on that one. Thanks, but I can't take credit for it, I saw someone who was using that setup, and just decided to make a step-by-step guide for it -Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
VanGogh Goldmember More info | Hey guys, need your help. Camera - 2x5Dmk3, C100 mkii, 70D, 60D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
StillCrazy Senior Member 612 posts Likes: 2 Joined Sep 2012 Location: Vermont, USA More info | Feb 01, 2014 08:37 | #40 Van Gogh wrote in post #16654877 Hey guys, need your help. I am not a specialist on filters (yet) but I still want to protect my glass.:p You don't need either of them to protect your glass, just keep the lens hood on and cap, and that will be protection enough, even if you drop it. The UV or clear filters do nothing to improve your photography. A UV may have been necessary in the film days, but for digital it is not. Save your $$. StillCrazy - after all these years.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
VanGogh Goldmember More info | Feb 01, 2014 08:44 | #41 StillCrazy wrote in post #16654986 You don't need either of them to protect your glass, just keep the lens hood on and cap, and that will be protection enough, even if you drop it. The UV or clear filters do nothing to improve your photography. A UV may have been necessary in the film days, but for digital it is not. Save your $$. Well I don't use filters on my current kit lenses, (and yes, I do use a Hood on them and think its a very good protection) but I might be just scared to use a $1,000+ lens without the extra little bit of protection. Camera - 2x5Dmk3, C100 mkii, 70D, 60D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
WaltA Goldmember More info | Feb 01, 2014 13:22 | #42 No filters. It doesn't make sense to put a cheap piece of glass between your subject and your lens. Cheap lens or expensive lens. Walt
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Snydremark my very own Lightrules moment More info | Feb 01, 2014 14:25 | #43 Van Gogh wrote in post #16655001 Well I don't use filters on my current kit lenses, (and yes, I do use a Hood on them and think its a very good protection) but I might be just scared to use a $1,000+ lens without the extra little bit of protection. On the other hand I have read that lens front elements made today are actually quiet resistant to scratches and other damages, so maybe you are right, I don't need any filters ... Glass is much harder to damage than skin; how often does the front end of your camera gear come in contact with something that you worry would scratch or cut your hand? - Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife
LOG IN TO REPLY |
1Tanker Goldmember 4,470 posts Likes: 8 Joined Jan 2011 Location: Swaying to the Symphony of Destruction More info | Feb 01, 2014 14:40 | #44 Van Gogh wrote in post #16654877 Hey guys, need your help. I am not a specialist on filters (yet) but I still want to protect my glass.:p I need a 77mm size filter, either UV or clear, solely for the purpose of protecting my glass. I found some on Henry's (canadian retailer) as well as some on ebay. The confusion is that the ones on ebay are more then twice as cheap and seem to be from the same brand .... Do you guys know which ones are better? I am debating between these ones. 1) Henr's (Canadian retailer, the expensive priced ones) http://www.henrys.com …N-UVO-DIGITAL-FILTER.aspx http://www.henrys.com …PRO-1D-UV-DMC-FILTER.aspx 2) Ebay http://www.ebay.ca …_trksid=p3984.m1438.l2649 http://www.ebay.ca …_trksid=p3984.m1438.l2649 ANy help ![]() Issues of filter or no filter aside. Henry's is expensive. In their defense though, they will price-match to local (same province) bricks and mortar shops. I generally price match to Aden Camera at Henrys. Kel
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sirrith Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 01, 2014 19:35 | #45 Van Gogh wrote in post #16654877 Hey guys, need your help. I am not a specialist on filters (yet) but I still want to protect my glass.:p I need a 77mm size filter, either UV or clear, solely for the purpose of protecting my glass. I found some on Henry's (canadian retailer) as well as some on ebay. The confusion is that the ones on ebay are more then twice as cheap and seem to be from the same brand .... Do you guys know which ones are better? I am debating between these ones. 1) Henr's (Canadian retailer, the expensive priced ones) http://www.henrys.com …N-UVO-DIGITAL-FILTER.aspx http://www.henrys.com …PRO-1D-UV-DMC-FILTER.aspx 2) Ebay http://www.ebay.ca …_trksid=p3984.m1438.l2649 http://www.ebay.ca …_trksid=p3984.m1438.l2649 ANy help ![]() I prefer the B+W MRC filters. They have no perceptible impact on IQ, and do a great job of protecting against scratches, dust, water, sand etc... But I would buy them from a reputable retail store, not eBay. There are too many fakes out there to trust eBay for filters, even top rated sellers. -Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1585 guests, 118 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||