Sirrith Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 21, 2014 17:31 | #556 It says: -Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 21, 2014 20:38 | #557 Sirrith wrote in post #16707488  It says: Good morning gentlemen. No price has been announced, and this price which has been floating around the internet for 15 days now is pure speculation on the part of the retailer to generate traffic for its site... and it is obviously working since even certain... (missing rest of post) ah, my ad block must have denied access to that, as I didnt see Sigma France actually responding earlier. Thanks!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jerobean Senior Member 785 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2008 More info | canon rumors has this as an expected April release...here's hoping. _______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Vixen89 Goldmember  4,528 posts Likes: 14 Joined Aug 2010 Location: D-Town, TX More info | Feb 22, 2014 23:13 | #559 Jerobean wrote in post #16709692 canon rumors has this as an expected April release...here's hoping. I hope so too! I'm actively lazy!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mtavel Member  149 posts Joined Dec 2010 More info | Feb 23, 2014 09:18 | #560 Jerobean wrote in post #16709692 canon rumors has this as an expected April release...here's hoping.
From: http://sigma-rumors.com …50mm-art-tidbits-roundup/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Vixen89 Goldmember 4,528 posts Likes: 14 Joined Aug 2010 Location: D-Town, TX More info | Feb 23, 2014 09:25 | #561 ^yay even better from Sigma! I'm actively lazy!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 23, 2014 09:58 | #562 I have to admit. I always feel my 35 is a tad short. I'm really thinking the 24 1.4 / sigma 50 art will be a better combo for me. A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JeremyBlake Senior Member  532 posts Likes: 4 Joined Aug 2012 Location: Columbus, OH, USA More info | Feb 24, 2014 19:15 | #563 I have the 35 f/1.4 and I know 35/50 are fairly close, but I'll still buy this. Sigma really got me with the 35. It's such an amazing lens. Hell, I might even buy an 85 ART over the Canon 85 f/1.2. Sigma has REALLY stepped it up. I just hope we do get the $899 price. flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nick3434 Goldmember  More info | Feb 26, 2014 05:30 | #564 Talley wrote in post #16710701 I have to admit. I always feel my 35 is a tad short. I'm really thinking the 24 1.4 / sigma 50 art will be a better combo for me.
Everything is relative.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
basketballfreak6 Goldmember More info | anyone saw this? https://www.tonyliuphotography.com.au/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EverydayGetaway Cream of the Crop  More info | Feb 28, 2014 02:23 | #566 basketballfreak6 wrote in post #16723385 anyone saw this? http://photorumors.com …1-4-dg-hsm-art-lens-test/ at least we now know it's sharp and i dunno if it's just my eyes, more contrasty than the otus? I saw that earlier today, definitely looks impressive. It's an exciting time to be a photographer. I think we've been at the point for a few years now where there's no such thing as a "bad" body on the new market, if this trend with lenses continues we might be able to say the same thing about lenses in the near future Fuji X-T3 // Fuji X-Pro2 (Full Spectrum) // Fuji X-H1 // Fuji X-T1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 28, 2014 04:17 | #567 |
Daniel0663 Member 109 posts Joined Nov 2013 More info | Feb 28, 2014 04:28 | #568 fingers crossed the source is reliable ..... if it is indeed performing as claimed. I will purchase this darn lens to replace my canon 50 1.4. 5D|Primes
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 28, 2014 08:25 | #569 my 50L might be going into retirement with news like that..... I'de be happy with near otus quality and near L price tag. Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jbm7777 Senior Member  More info | Feb 28, 2014 08:45 | #570 Crazy sharp looking, anyone else out there have a 50/85 combo. I already have the siggy 35 but once I switched to FF I found it a bit wide. If I'm shooting wide its normally landscape which I don't really need the crazy fast speed for. This lens is making me consider a 50 for walk around and 85 for studio/portrait shoots. I just don't know if I can swing the 50 this year while saving up for the 70-200 which is a huge gap in my lineup. GAS problems... Canon 6D | Canon 17-40L | 70-200L IS II | Sigma 35mm f/1.4 | Canon 100L | Canon Speedlite 600EX-RT | xplor 600 | flashpoint 360 | alien bee B800
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1713 guests, 131 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
| 
(24Lii, sigma 50A, 135L), and for the other ends of the spectrum, sigmaEX 14mm2.8 and sigmaEX 100-300F4.
