davidfarina wrote in post #16630604
wow tack sharp :O
wow tack sharp :O
That was my first though - and I'm using a stupid sharp system for studio work...
pyrojim Goldmember 1,882 posts Likes: 4 Joined Jan 2010 Location: San Jose, CA More info | Jan 24, 2014 00:37 | #16 davidfarina wrote in post #16630604 wow tack sharp :O That was my first though - and I'm using a stupid sharp system for studio work... PhaseOne H25
LOG IN TO REPLY |
basketballfreak6 Goldmember More info | Jan 24, 2014 00:42 | #17 Mr Luvpants wrote in post #16629029 Where did you get the Sigma from as I can't find it that cheap? JOHN not sure where you are but for some reason we in australia have some of the best prices when it comes to sigma lenses, like i picked up my sigma 35 for ~700 on a sale only a few months after release https://www.tonyliuphotography.com.au/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MrLuvpants Member 52 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2010 More info | Jan 24, 2014 04:10 | #18 Im on the Sunshine Coast, QLD.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 24, 2014 04:17 | #19 Mr Luvpants wrote in post #16632104 Im on the Sunshine Coast, QLD. Digidirect have it for the same price.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Anthon Senior Member 267 posts Joined May 2012 More info | Jan 24, 2014 04:33 | #20 Yes - but is it weather sealed? Canon 5D mark II Gripped / 17-40mm f4 L / 24-105mm f4 L / Canon 70-200 f4 L / Samyang 14mm 2.8 AE / Pentax SMC 50mm f1.7 / Pentax SMC 28 2.8 / Canon Speedlite 600ex-rt / Canon Speedlite 580ex II / YN560 II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
basketballfreak6 Goldmember More info | Jan 24, 2014 05:39 | #21 Mr Luvpants wrote in post #16632104 Im on the Sunshine Coast, QLD. lol oops https://www.tonyliuphotography.com.au/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 24, 2014 05:59 | #22 I notice at 102mm the 70-200 is closer to the subject than the Sigma at 105, did you move the setup or is it the usual close focus changes length problem? http://natureimmortal.blogspot.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011  More info | Jan 24, 2014 06:11 | #23 Neilyb wrote in post #16632200 I notice at 102mm the 70-200 is closer to the subject than the Sigma at 105, did you move the setup or is it the usual close focus changes length problem? Sigma lenses focus breathe a bit more than others. Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 24, 2014 07:17 | #24 All hand held, Bodies - Canon EOS 5DIII | EOS 6D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ahmed0essam 1474 guests, 170 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
