Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Marketplace & Market Info Market Watch 
Thread started 10 Jan 2014 (Friday) 13:54
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Sanyo Eneloop XX 950mAh Typical / 900mAh Minimum on Amazon - $13.39

 
bikfoto
Alexander the Wannabe
Avatar
423 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jan 2013
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     
Jan 10, 2014 13:54 |  #1

Saw this deal on Amazon last night for Sanyo Eneloop XX AA batteries (external link) - $13.39 + FS with Prime

Great deal if you're looking at "black" eneloops.


bikfoto (external link)
Need a WEBSITE? (external link)
Gear & Feedback
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bearmann
Goldmember
Avatar
1,228 posts
Likes: 57
Joined Feb 2008
Location: I live behind Graceland in a tool shed. I often meet the man early in the morning at Krispy Kreme.
     
Jan 10, 2014 14:01 |  #2

Here is the correct link: http://www.amazon.com …r=8-1&keywords=eneloop+xx (external link)


Barry

http://b-r-s-photo.zenfolio.com (external link) (remove the dashes)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bps
Cream of the Crop
7,607 posts
Likes: 406
Joined Mar 2007
Location: California
     
Jan 10, 2014 14:32 |  #3

I've been using the regular white Eneloops for years and absolutely love them. Does anyone here have any solid experience with the black XX version? Is there a noticeable difference in real world usage?

Thanks,
Bryan


My Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkbslc
Cream of the Crop
24,604 posts
Likes: 45
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Utah, USA
     
Jan 10, 2014 14:55 |  #4

950mAh are the AAA's


Taylor
Galleries: Flickr (external link)
EOS Rp | iPhone 11 Pro Max

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
caoko
Senior Member
260 posts
Joined Aug 2012
     
Jan 10, 2014 15:46 |  #5

bps wrote in post #16594627 (external link)
I've been using the regular white Eneloops for years and absolutely love them. Does anyone here have any solid experience with the black XX version? Is there a noticeable difference in real world usage?

Thanks,
Bryan

people have tested these in flashes and the recharge is faster than the standard white eneloops.

they are worse for non-high drain applications, since they are more expensive and less recharge cycles.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bearmann
Goldmember
Avatar
1,228 posts
Likes: 57
Joined Feb 2008
Location: I live behind Graceland in a tool shed. I often meet the man early in the morning at Krispy Kreme.
     
Jan 10, 2014 15:58 |  #6

Still, 500 cycles is a lot of recharges. For an old guy like me, 500 is plenty ;) I'll still have enough recharges to power the night light in my coffin until the devil grabs me.


Barry

http://b-r-s-photo.zenfolio.com (external link) (remove the dashes)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bps
Cream of the Crop
7,607 posts
Likes: 406
Joined Mar 2007
Location: California
     
Jan 10, 2014 17:52 |  #7

Bearmann wrote in post #16594865 (external link)
Still, 500 cycles is a lot of recharges. For an old guy like me, 500 is plenty ;) I'll still have enough recharges to power the night light in my coffin until the devil grabs me.

LOL! :lol:

I have to admit, the 500 recharge cycles don't bother me either. I have a lot of rechargeable, so I'm pretty sure I'll never reach that number.

I think I'll hold off on buying any XX Eneloops until there is a really, really good sale that rivals the price of regular Eneloops...or when I really need the extra capabilities they provide.

Bryan


My Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Avatar
11,091 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 2795
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Jan 10, 2014 17:52 |  #8

Can you use the older white charger? If so then I'll pick me up a set.


A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
My Gear Archive

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SYS
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,716 posts
Gallery: 602 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 48476
Joined Jul 2004
Location: Gilligan's Island
     
Jan 11, 2014 08:07 |  #9

Higher the mAh, lower the LSD (low self discharge) performance. The main reason for purchasing the LSD rechargeable batteries is exactly that, LSD performance, and nothing beats the original white eneloops. So why would you want to pay MORE for something that cuts down the number of recharges by HALF and for LESS LSD performance?



"Life is short, art is long..."
-Goethe
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bps
Cream of the Crop
7,607 posts
Likes: 406
Joined Mar 2007
Location: California
     
Jan 11, 2014 09:34 |  #10

Thanks for the good advice SYS. My white Eneloops recycle fast, hold their charge for a really long time, and are as strong as the day I bought them. No need to try anything different here!

Bryan


My Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SYS
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,716 posts
Gallery: 602 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 48476
Joined Jul 2004
Location: Gilligan's Island
     
Jan 11, 2014 09:39 |  #11

bps wrote in post #16596485 (external link)
Thanks for the good advice SYS. My white Eneloops recycle fast, hold their charge for a really long time, and are as strong as the day I bought them. No need to try anything different here!

Bryan

A sharpie writes better on white than on black eneloops, too. :)



"Life is short, art is long..."
-Goethe
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
iazybandit
Goldmember
2,258 posts
Likes: 89
Joined Apr 2011
Location: New York
     
Jan 11, 2014 10:43 |  #12

SYS wrote in post #16596495 (external link)
A sharpie writes better on white than on black eneloops, too. :)

A silver sharpie writes better on black ;)


Canon :: R5 | R6 | RP
Glass :: RF 15-35 f2.8L IS | RF 24-70 f/2.8L IS | RF 70-200 f/2.8L IS | RF 35mm f/1.8
FEEDBACK
FS: 3D Printed RF 35mm Lens Hood | PakPod Tripod

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bearmann
Goldmember
Avatar
1,228 posts
Likes: 57
Joined Feb 2008
Location: I live behind Graceland in a tool shed. I often meet the man early in the morning at Krispy Kreme.
     
Jan 11, 2014 12:09 |  #13

SYS wrote in post #16596331 (external link)
Higher the mAh, lower the LSD (low self discharge) performance. The main reason for purchasing the LSD rechargeable batteries is exactly that, LSD performance, and nothing beats the original white eneloops. So why would you want to pay MORE for something that cuts down the number of recharges by HALF and for LESS LSD performance?


SYS,

Knowing that you are an expert on batteries and performed the mother of all battery tests, I hesitate to reply. However, never having developed the good sense to keep my mouth shut at the appropriate times, I'm going to stick my neck out. The XX batteries hold 75% of their charge after one year, or 0.75 x 2500 = 1850. I can't find the one year rate on the regular Eneloops, but I think it must be around 90% for the most recent models, or 0.90 x 2000 =1800. So for the first year, the XX will run longer, and after that the regular Eneloops will pull ahead. So if you want a battery that will last longer between re-charges, the XX batteries seem to be a good choice.


Barry

http://b-r-s-photo.zenfolio.com (external link) (remove the dashes)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SYS
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,716 posts
Gallery: 602 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 48476
Joined Jul 2004
Location: Gilligan's Island
     
Jan 11, 2014 12:54 |  #14

Bearmann wrote in post #16596817 (external link)
SYS,

Knowing that you are an expert on batteries and performed the mother of all battery tests, I hesitate to reply. However, never having developed the good sense to keep my mouth shut at the appropriate times, I'm going to stick my neck out. The XX batteries hold 75% of their charge after one year, or 0.75 x 2500 = 1850. I can't find the one year rate on the regular Eneloops, but I think it must be around 90% for the most recent models, or 0.90 x 2000 =1800. So for the first year, the XX will run longer, and after that the regular Eneloops will pull ahead. So if you want a battery that will last longer between re-charges, the XX batteries seem to be a good choice.

I don't know why you're multiplying the LSD rate with mAh. Regardless of the stated mAh, 75% LSD rate of the XX batteries loses juice faster than 80% of the LSD rate of the original white eneloops.

Now, if you don't really care about the LSD factor and you just want more flash pops, then XX batteries would be better than the original white eneloops simply because higher the mAh, more the flash pops. But then, why purchase XX batteries when there are much better performing batteries in terms of higher mAh, such as Powerex 2700's, and probably at a lower price, too?

The battery technology is such that you can't have BOTH the highest mAh AND the longest LSD in a single NihM cell. Things will change eventually, but currently the "sweet spot" where the power of mAh and the longest LSD performance come together is in those original white eneloops.

So the question is what batteries to use for what applications. I always go for the original white eneloops for all application where I could use the longest LSD performance, such as remotes, radios, and so on. For anything else, I go to those batteries that offer the most mAh, like Powerex 2700's or something similar. I don't bother with anything else that falls somewhere in between these two.

In my opinion, XX batteries are created and marketed by Sanyo simply because they have to after such a huge success with the original eneloops and all the hype that has developed around it. They'd be foolish not to. With the XX, they pushed the mAh but only at the sacrifice of LSD. Most consumers wouldn't know, anyway, and they'd spend their money on these newer eneloops thinking that they do provide greater power at the same LSD rate when in fact it doesn't. On paper, 75% vs. 80% might seem not all that significant, but I believe there is, albeit I haven't done a side by side comparative test. The fact of the matter is that people buy eneloops for their LSD performance for applications that call for alkaline-like performance, and the original eneloop does that best so why spend more money on something that's neither the best LSD nor offers the most mAh?



"Life is short, art is long..."
-Goethe
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bearmann
Goldmember
Avatar
1,228 posts
Likes: 57
Joined Feb 2008
Location: I live behind Graceland in a tool shed. I often meet the man early in the morning at Krispy Kreme.
     
Jan 12, 2014 08:41 |  #15

SYS wrote in post #16596913 (external link)
I don't know why you're multiplying the LSD rate with mAh. Regardless of the stated mAh, 75% LSD rate of the XX batteries loses juice faster than 80% of the LSD rate of the original white eneloops.

But won't that tell you the remaining capacity at one year on the shelf? Say you have a Mack truck and a Camry. The Camry starts out with 20 gallons of gas and gets 30 miles to the gallon. The Mack truck only gets 10 miles to the gallon, but starts out with 100 gallons of gas. The Mack truck will go longer between fill-ups.

SYS wrote in post #16596913 (external link)
Now, if you don't really care about the LSD factor and you just want more flash pops, then XX batteries would be better than the original white eneloops simply because higher the mAh, more the flash pops. But then, why purchase XX batteries when there are much better performing batteries in terms of higher mAh, such as Powerex 2700's, and probably at a lower price, too?

I use my batteries sporatically, and usually have time to charge them before an event. I do like to keep some pre-charged batteries on hand though for back up in case I forget, don't have time, etc., so I have been using the white Eneloops and Powerex 2700's. Like some others, I'm finding that the Powerex 2700s don't seem to allow many recharge cycles. Even with only sporatic use and a MH-C204W charger, they seem to go bad in about a year. Now I have a MH-C9000 charger which allows for reconditioning, but I don't think that others have found that this makes a difference. So now I'm thinking that the Eneloop XX at 2500 mAh are nearly the same capacity as the Powerex 2700s and may provide more years of service. With this current deal the price is nearly the same with the Powerex at $13.90.

SYS wrote in post #16596913 (external link)
The battery technology is such that you can't have BOTH the highest mAh AND the longest LSD in a single NihM cell. Things will change eventually, but currently the "sweet spot" where the power of mAh and the longest LSD performance come together is in those original white eneloops.

So the question is what batteries to use for what applications. I always go for the original white eneloops for all application where I could use the longest LSD performance, such as remotes, radios, and so on. For anything else, I go to those batteries that offer the most mAh, like Powerex 2700's or something similar. I don't bother with anything else that falls somewhere in between these two.

In my opinion, XX batteries are created and marketed by Sanyo simply because they have to after such a huge success with the original eneloops and all the hype that has developed around it. They'd be foolish not to. With the XX, they pushed the mAh but only at the sacrifice of LSD. Most consumers wouldn't know, anyway, and they'd spend their money on these newer eneloops thinking that they do provide greater power at the same LSD rate when in fact it doesn't. On paper, 75% vs. 80% might seem not all that significant, but I believe there is, albeit I haven't done a side by side comparative test. The fact of the matter is that people buy eneloops for their LSD performance for applications that call for alkaline-like performance, and the original eneloop does that best so why spend more money on something that's neither the best LSD nor offers the most mAh?


Barry

http://b-r-s-photo.zenfolio.com (external link) (remove the dashes)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,075 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Sanyo Eneloop XX 950mAh Typical / 900mAh Minimum on Amazon - $13.39
FORUMS Marketplace & Market Info Market Watch 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1055 guests, 101 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.