Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
Thread started 13 Jan 2014 (Monday) 15:26
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Head Shot taken at a conference

 
Doctorh
Senior Member
Avatar
935 posts
Likes: 29
Joined Jan 2010
Location: South East Texas
     
Jan 13, 2014 15:26 |  #1

This is one of the head shots I took at a conference this last week.This lady has such a great personality and she was so easy to shoot on the fly.
This was shot with a 5D MK II, a 50 mm F1.4 lens, at F4.5, 1/60 ISO 250, bracket with flash. What do you think?

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2014/01/2/LQ_673686.jpg
Image hosted by forum (673686) © Doctorh [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Canon R6, 2 Canon 5D Mk II; Sony A6000; 16-35 LF2.8; 24-70 F2.8 L; 24-105 F4 IS L; 70-200 F4 IS L; 28-135 F3.5; 50 F1.4; RF 24-105 F4 IS L, and 580 EX11

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,917 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14911
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jan 13, 2014 15:29 |  #2

I think the light is still pretty harsh. Flash on the bracket is fine for event work, but when it comes time for the potrait/ headshot work bounce is your friend.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LV ­ Moose
Moose gets blamed for everything.
Avatar
23,434 posts
Gallery: 223 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 4798
Joined Dec 2008
     
Jan 13, 2014 15:30 |  #3

Nice DoF; got all of her face in focus, but blurred the background. Light's a little harsh, and it might have been better if she hadn't been facing directly at the camera; angled slightly, but still looking at you. IMHO.

gonzogolf wrote in post #16602580 (external link)
... bounce is your friend.

+1


Moose

Gear... Flickr (external link)...Flickr 2 (external link)...
Macro (external link)...Hummingbirds (external link)
Aircraft (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrickR
Cream of the Crop
5,935 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Dallas TX
     
Jan 13, 2014 21:55 |  #4

gonzogolf wrote in post #16602580 (external link)
bounce is your friend.

^+2


My junk
The grass isn't greener on the other side, it's green where you water it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Doctorh
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
935 posts
Likes: 29
Joined Jan 2010
Location: South East Texas
     
Jan 15, 2014 16:55 |  #5

Here is another shot taken at the conference, is the lighting better? To me, shooting on the fly like this and getting the lighting close to perfect is difficult.

This one was shot with the 5D MkII at F4.5, 1/60, ISO 400 at 35 mm with a 16-35 L F2.8 and flash on a bracket.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2014/01/3/LQ_673897.jpg
Image hosted by forum (673897) © Doctorh [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Canon R6, 2 Canon 5D Mk II; Sony A6000; 16-35 LF2.8; 24-70 F2.8 L; 24-105 F4 IS L; 70-200 F4 IS L; 28-135 F3.5; 50 F1.4; RF 24-105 F4 IS L, and 580 EX11

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rushmore
Goldmember
Avatar
1,116 posts
Likes: 82
Joined Nov 2012
Location: Leamington Spa, Warwickshire, UK
     
Jan 16, 2014 07:20 |  #6

I think they are just why they are... Snapshots of people at an event.. Nothing you would be able to do with a point and shoot...

Sorry if I offend, but you did ask what I thought... I'd personally never use a 50mm for a headshot.. It's just not as flattering as something longer...


Reppin the 5D iii and 7D with some lenses and some lights
LIKE MY PHOTOGRAPHY PAGE (external link)
MY STUDIO FACEBOOK PAGE (external link)
www.phlashworx.co.uk (external link)
My Photography Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ederphoto
Member
54 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 6
Joined Jun 2012
     
Jan 16, 2014 08:38 |  #7

I don't know you camera to subject distance were but with a 50mm ,it seems like you were right there in their faces .The pictures were well exposed .I don't like the angle in the first picture for two reasons: one it looks like a drivers licenses photo and second her blond hair seems to blend with the background in tone .This is my personal opinion .The second one is much better but when shooting headshots with a cropped body you have to stay back otherwise it will look like you are squeezing your subject ears .I took the liberty to modify the picture to demonstrate my view .Off course i ton of things can be done in photoshop but here it is just about lens to subject distance . I rather use an 85mm but if distance doesn't allow it a 50mm works great ! Nothing wrong with that .This is a crude touch up to demonstrate the cropping .

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2014/01/3/LQ_673952.jpg
Image hosted by forum (673952) © ederphoto [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,917 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14911
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jan 16, 2014 08:57 |  #8

Doctorh wrote in post #16608707 (external link)
Here is another shot taken at the conference, is the lighting better? To me, shooting on the fly like this and getting the lighting close to perfect is difficult.

This one was shot with the 5D MkII at F4.5, 1/60, ISO 400 at 35 mm with a 16-35 L F2.8 and flash on a bracket.

Framing that tightly with a 35mm lens on a full frame body is a sure recipe for an unflattering photo. Perspective distortion is hard on most people, even worse if you are a bit older or not thin as a rail. The lighting is a bit softer, but you have good gear, make it work for you.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
watt100
Cream of the Crop
14,021 posts
Likes: 34
Joined Jun 2008
     
Jan 16, 2014 13:29 |  #9

Doctorh wrote in post #16608707 (external link)
Here is another shot taken at the conference, is the lighting better? To me, shooting on the fly like this and getting the lighting close to perfect is difficult.

This one was shot with the 5D MkII at F4.5, 1/60, ISO 400 at 35 mm with a 16-35 L F2.8 and flash on a bracket.

I agree with the other posters, learn to bounce the light and get further away from your subject




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Doctorh
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
935 posts
Likes: 29
Joined Jan 2010
Location: South East Texas
     
Jan 16, 2014 15:28 |  #10

Thank you to everyone for the comments-they are appreciated!


Canon R6, 2 Canon 5D Mk II; Sony A6000; 16-35 LF2.8; 24-70 F2.8 L; 24-105 F4 IS L; 70-200 F4 IS L; 28-135 F3.5; 50 F1.4; RF 24-105 F4 IS L, and 580 EX11

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 1061
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
     
Jan 16, 2014 15:52 |  #11
bannedPermanent ban

The horizon line behind them is quite disturbing. Try not to slap people against the wall, the background becomes very intrusive, even at large apertures.


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PapaGary
Senior Member
Avatar
515 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Toe-puke-ah, Kansas
     
Jan 16, 2014 16:16 |  #12

I agree with the above comments but I'm sure the ladies would enjoy their photos.

The first lady has what appears to be perfect teeth. Was this a dental conference?:-D




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ktan7
Goldmember
1,016 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2013
Location: Vancouver
     
Jan 16, 2014 20:56 |  #13

I agree that the light is a bit too harsh on picture #1.


Vancouver wedding photography (external link)
Picture blog (external link)
Mexico wedding photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ingerson"PCD"
Goldmember
Avatar
2,796 posts
Gallery: 96 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 608
Joined Mar 2010
Location: San Diego, California
     
Jan 17, 2014 04:12 |  #14

These are all on camera flash correct? I really don't consider the lighting "harsh" with these at all. They are well exposed. On camera flash is going to get you an image that is sharp and clear, but 9 times out of 10 there is no mood to it. I'm sorry my friend, but these are a bit bland. Get that flash off camera and watch how much more interesting your portraits become.


-Eric-
I have too many hobbies to be good at any of them.
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HappySnapper90
Cream of the Crop
5,145 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Jan 17, 2014 17:37 |  #15

Choose a better background. You have a divided background in both photos instead of all solid background that would draw less attention to my viewing the images.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,278 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Head Shot taken at a conference
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1046 guests, 160 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.