Which composition do you folks prefer? Kind of stuck in paralysis by analysis. Thanks for any feedback.
http://www.parkcamper.com …loads/2014/01/front-1.jpg![]()
http://www.parkcamper.com …loads/2014/01/front-2.jpg![]()
Mike55 Goldmember 4,206 posts Likes: 9 Joined Jun 2007 Location: Chicago, Illinois More info | Jan 14, 2014 22:01 | #1 Which composition do you folks prefer? Kind of stuck in paralysis by analysis. Thanks for any feedback. 6D | 70D | 24-105 L IS | 17-40 L | 300 F4 L IS | 50 1.8 II | 1.4x II | LR5 | HV30 | bug spray | wilderness
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Snydremark my very own Lightrules moment More info | Jan 14, 2014 22:06 | #2 I like the first one better; it has more of a feel of 'being there'. The second one feels like it's more remote, like viewing the scene from somewhere else. - Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BadHabit Goldmember 2,102 posts Gallery: 53 photos Likes: 164 Joined Apr 2011 Location: If I'm not here, I must be someplace else More info | Jan 14, 2014 22:08 | #3 They're both great. I prefer the 2nd one, the tree doesn't crowd the foreground as much and provides some depth JR / flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cerett Senior Member 823 posts Likes: 240 Joined Jun 2013 Location: Santa Ana, California More info |
Helenica Senior Member 718 posts Likes: 9 Joined Mar 2006 Location: Oosterhout, Netherlands More info | Jan 15, 2014 10:17 | #5 A also like the first one most. What I suspect would have been even better, was to take a step or two to the right so that the tree in the foreground is placed on the intersection of thirds. Cheers, Helen
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mike55 THREAD STARTER Goldmember 4,206 posts Likes: 9 Joined Jun 2007 Location: Chicago, Illinois More info | Jan 15, 2014 13:14 | #6 Thanks everyone! 6D | 70D | 24-105 L IS | 17-40 L | 300 F4 L IS | 50 1.8 II | 1.4x II | LR5 | HV30 | bug spray | wilderness
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 16, 2014 06:21 | #7 Like the first. Makes the mountains more imposing. Comments, Questions, Observations Welcome
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Numenorean Cream of the Crop 5,013 posts Likes: 28 Joined Feb 2011 More info | Jan 17, 2014 10:01 | #8 Neither really. The foreground is lacking good interest and it takes up most of the photo.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tom1s Goldmember 1,919 posts Likes: 2 Joined Dec 2005 Location: Arizona, USA More info | I actually like the foreground and composition. It has a subdued quality that contrasts the drama of the clouds and mountains. I like the colors, too. - I discovered I scream the same way whether I'm about to be devoured by a great white shark or if a piece of seaweed touches my foot.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
virginie24jb Senior Member More info | Jan 18, 2014 06:14 | #10 Number 2 for me. It's "softer" ... http://www.virginie-bitterlin.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Monkeytoes 1386 guests, 177 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||