Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 15 Jan 2014 (Wednesday) 15:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Ringlight vs. ringflash

 
UKmitch86
Senior Member
Avatar
318 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 14
Joined Jun 2012
Location: Leicestershire, UK
     
Jan 15, 2014 15:20 |  #1

Hi all. I'm getting rid of my 85/1.8 which seems to be a focal length that doesn't really work for me, and want to replace it with either a Tamron 90mm or Canon 100mm macro.

I've dabbled in macro, but one thing I've always known I need is carefully positioned extra light. In the UK it's just too dull, not to mention indoors subjects.

I don't want to commit too much funding to it, which is why I ask;
1) Ring lights are basically LED flashes, right?
2) LED rings are cheaper than mfr. brand ringlites?
3) Do they perform similarly? i.e. GNs
4) Are the results comparable between each other?
5) Are there any known-brand LED rings out there? I see this Manfrotto 'Aura' but can't seem to find reviews or anywhere to buy it.

Thanks in advance

edit - I have also just seen the Yongnuo version... anyone with experience?


Canon 1Ds3 | 16-35/4 | 50/1.8 | 135/2
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/ukmitch86/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
frugivore
Goldmember
3,089 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 118
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Jan 15, 2014 15:32 |  #2

Some of the LEDs that I've looked at have a GN of 14' vs the 46' that Canon's ring flash has. So it's a lot more powerful but more expensive of course. You'd probably want to make sure that the LED color is close to daylight.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dogcatcher
Junior Member
21 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Surrey/Sussex border. UK
     
Feb 02, 2014 10:23 as a reply to  @ frugivore's post |  #3

I've been using a cheap led ring light for a couple of years just to photograph voucher photos of insects but it is not bright enough to allow me to use a higher speed to overcome any motion by the subject so I've additionally tried using a couple of portable led lights but they cast nasty shadows. This is with the EFS 60mm macro often with an extension tube, I've never tried it on my 100 or 180 lenses. I'm now thinking about treating myself to a good quality ring flash or light.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlashZebra
This space available
Avatar
4,427 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Northern Kentucky
     
Feb 02, 2014 11:37 |  #4

If a 85mm lenses "focal length" does not meet you needs in a meaningful manner, why do you think a 90mm (or even a 100mm lens) lens will be just the ticket.

That 5mm focal length difference is insignificant (except for all but a very few obtuse applications).

I can understand why you might want a close focusing macro lens, but you specifically indicated "85/1.8 which seems to be a focal length that doesn't really work for me".

Enjoy! Lon


*
http://flashzebra.com/ (external link)
*

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
UKmitch86
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
318 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 14
Joined Jun 2012
Location: Leicestershire, UK
     
Feb 02, 2014 14:49 |  #5

FlashZebra wrote in post #16657909 (external link)
If a 85mm lenses "focal length" does not meet you needs in a meaningful manner, why do you think a 90mm (or even a 100mm lens) lens will be just the ticket.

That 5mm focal length difference is insignificant (except for all but a very few obtuse applications).

I can understand why you might want a close focusing macro lens, but you specifically indicated "focal length that doesn't really work for me".

Enjoy! Lon

I see what you're asking! I think the fact that a non-macro 85mm doesn't suit me doesn't really extend into not suiting me for macro work. I've borrowed a 90mm Tamron macro that I do like, very much. I will have to remember that it's just not a good walkaround length for me.

I carried on reading after I posted my initial query... the LEDs are certainly poor and while I'm sure some people have good luck with them, it wasn't what I was after. I got the Yongnuo YN-14EX after finding out Yongnuo's reliability has been improving and that they are the manufacturer for Canon's OEM flashes.

The guide number issue is a non-issue - the GN of 14 is plenty for close work, and is also the same as Canon's MR-14EX. The Yongnuo is a flash tube model (Xenon I think) and produces the sort of light my standard Canon 430EX2 produces.

I produced these as starters;

IMAGE: http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3774/12255221696_6503bb379f.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://flic.kr/p/jEXdr​N  (external link)

IMAGE: http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3819/12254849703_0371427f3c.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://flic.kr/p/jEViS​8  (external link)

IMAGE: http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3713/12255135994_66b48cf55c.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://flic.kr/p/jEWLY​b  (external link)

IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7291/12254894123_440e6d813f.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://flic.kr/p/jEVx4​Z  (external link)

Canon 1Ds3 | 16-35/4 | 50/1.8 | 135/2
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/ukmitch86/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,569 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Ringlight vs. ringflash
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1511 guests, 131 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.