Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 15 Jan 2014 (Wednesday) 20:23
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Travel tripod + ballhead for a RZ67

 
sircanon
Member
226 posts
Joined Oct 2011
     
Jan 15, 2014 20:23 |  #1

Long story short its time for me to buy another tripod setup again. For the past two years I have gotten by with a cheap Dolcia tripod and ballhead (external link) from amazon for stills work and a nicer Cowboy studio Tripod (external link) for video work.

The dolcia worked out perfect for use with my DSLR but now that I have a 6.5lb camera it is far from sturdy even though it is rated at for 10lbs. The cowboy studio tripod works great with my RZ67 but the weight of the tripod is close to 10lbs and is not what I would consider light.

What I do like about the dolcia is the ability to strap it onto my camera bookbag and hike without even feeling it back there. 70% of my shoots are on locaiton where I usually hike to the final location and like to keep my gear as light as possible.

What I like about the Cowboy studio tripod is that is very sturdy. Easy to level bowl mount and quick to setup and take down. Also it has a 75mm bowl mount which I have adapted for using flat mount ball heads and fluid heads.

So I guess what I am looking for is a tripod and ball head combo which is around 5-6lbs and sturdy enough to hold a RZ67 and Leaf Aptus digital back.

Any suggestions? I would like to keep this purchase under $500


RZ67, Pentax 67, 5D mk II
Add me on Flickr! (external link)
www.camwilliamsphoto.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nWmR12
Senior Member
669 posts
Likes: 99
Joined Oct 2008
     
Jan 16, 2014 20:18 |  #2

What I use which is probably out of your budget but I have a Gitzo 1541T and a Markins Q3t. You could look into feisol they are cheaper compared to the gitzo. Not sure about the head but I like mine and it holds it very well, without problems. Unfortunately cheap and lightweight don't mix very well...


5DIII, 5Dc, 24-105L, 100-400L, 14mm Rokinon 21 ZE, 35L, 50 1.4, 50CM 2.5, Rokkor 58mm 1.2. 85 1.8, 135L |S90| Film: Mamiya RZ67 ProII/ Mamiya 7II | Rolleiflex 2.8C
flickr (external link)|500px (external link)|facebook (external link) - Travel/landscape | facebook (external link) - Portrait| Instagram (external link)
Portfolio (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sircanon
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
226 posts
Joined Oct 2011
     
Jan 17, 2014 09:12 |  #3

Thank you for the insight nWmR12 but I was hoping to keep the sticks around 300-350 and the ballhead around $200. There has to be a decent set of sticks out here for that price am I wrong?


RZ67, Pentax 67, 5D mk II
Add me on Flickr! (external link)
www.camwilliamsphoto.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nWmR12
Senior Member
669 posts
Likes: 99
Joined Oct 2008
     
Jan 17, 2014 23:01 |  #4

I suppose I should have read your post a bit more carefully. Anyways I see you are looking at 5-6lbs (doesn't seem super light weight compared to the dolcia) but I would look into the Manfrotto tripods, Sub 200 or 300ish range, maybe the 055CXPRO3 just under 300 from BH or something similar. That one should easily be able to hold the RZ, You also have the choice of aluminum or CF, I'd pick the CF if you want to save some weight, 3.64 v 5 lbs... Then you can pick your poison with various different type of ball head brands .My Markins Q3t can hold my RZ+lens+back and such without drooping, as a point of reference.


5DIII, 5Dc, 24-105L, 100-400L, 14mm Rokinon 21 ZE, 35L, 50 1.4, 50CM 2.5, Rokkor 58mm 1.2. 85 1.8, 135L |S90| Film: Mamiya RZ67 ProII/ Mamiya 7II | Rolleiflex 2.8C
flickr (external link)|500px (external link)|facebook (external link) - Travel/landscape | facebook (external link) - Portrait| Instagram (external link)
Portfolio (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
peter_n
Goldmember
Avatar
2,483 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 124
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Boston, USA
     
Jan 18, 2014 09:08 |  #5

If you're tall look at the Feisol tripods, if you're on the smaller side Benro are good. Photo Clam make decent ballheads that don't cost a lot. I'm 5' 8" and use a Benro C2680T with a heavy Fotoman 617 panoramic and Schneider 110mm lens and it's stable with that combo.

Now the tripod only sells as a kit with the Benro B1 ballhead; the C2680TB1 - cost is around $350. You would probably want to sell the B1 head and get a Photo Clam or a used Markins head though. The tripod is great but the head is just OK.


~Peter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chris_holtmeier
Goldmember
Avatar
2,213 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 3012
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Omaha
     
Jan 18, 2014 09:30 |  #6

I went with a Promaster carbon set. Prices vary by dealer, but I paid $150 for the legs.

Very light, very stable with my RZ and 110mm.



https://www.facebook.c​om/FotonFoto (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jtmiv
Senior Member
389 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Likes: 216
Joined Jan 2013
Location: Harrisburg, PA
     
Jan 18, 2014 12:47 |  #7

Dear sircanon,

I recently purchased a Benro A3580F tripod and a Benro B-2 ballhead, along with a Promaster gimbal mount.

Without extending the center column at all it is more than high enough for me to mount a Canon 1DMK2 or gripped 20D and I am 6' 5" tall. The legs are rated to support 33 pounds and they have no problem with my 1D body and a Sigma 150-500 lens mounted on a gimbal mount.

The tripod retails for $ 168.00 and the head retails for $ 192.00 which puts it slightly above your desired price. You could always opt for the SIRUI K40-X ballhead, it goes for about $ 145.00 which will then be back in your range. That ballhead was rated as a good budget choice for heavy gear in the review by DPreview posted elsewhere on this page.

My Benro tripod is a bit heavy, it weighs about 6 pounds +/- with the head attached but I'm a big fella and my lunch box easily weighs that much! It comes with a nice carry bag, a tool kit, and spiked feet for outdoor use. A quality bag and spiked feet, if you can even find a set, will be extra with the Manfrotto 055XPROB legs and set you back another $ 40.00 - $ 70.00.

I looked at the Manfrotto legs before I bought the Benro. They are nice legs and are tall enough for a big guy like me if the center column is extended just a smidge. If you can catch them on sale at $ 149.99 then they might be the way to go for you. If you have to pay full boat retail of $ 199.99 then buy the Benro, its a much better tripod in my opinion.

Hope this helps.

Regards,

Tim Murphy :D


"Then the coal company came with the world's largest shovel
And they tortured the timber and stripped all the land
Well, they dug for their coal till the land was forsaken
Then they wrote it all down as the progress of man"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sircanon
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
226 posts
Joined Oct 2011
     
Jan 18, 2014 14:19 |  #8

Thank you everyone for the helpful post and insight. I definitely think the Benro A3580F are the sticks I am looking for with a max height of almost 70" and a weight of only 5 lbs for $170 at B&H.

The induro bhd3 head looks good and reviews are spot on. Anyone have any first hand experience with this brand?
http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …79_003_BHD3_Bal​lhead.html (external link)

Thanks again


RZ67, Pentax 67, 5D mk II
Add me on Flickr! (external link)
www.camwilliamsphoto.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CallumRD1
Senior Member
Avatar
443 posts
Gallery: 22 photos
Likes: 465
Joined Sep 2012
Location: Boulder, Colorado
     
Jan 18, 2014 15:14 as a reply to  @ sircanon's post |  #9

I've used an Induro BHD-2 and own an Induro AT 213. The BHD-2 was fine, just nothing special for the price. I did not like the position of the knobs. If I had the tension knob in my left hand as I normally do (camera in right), the panning knob is underneath the lens, in a very akward position. It seems like they designed the ergonomics for someone with a left handed DSLR so the tension was controlled with the right hand. I ended up returning it and purchasing a Horusbennu LX-5 instead, which I have been 100% happy with.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,050 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Travel tripod + ballhead for a RZ67
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is AlainPre
1449 guests, 155 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.