xarqi Cream of the Crop  10,435 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Aotearoa/New Zealand More info | Jan 16, 2014 21:27 | #16 Pagman wrote in post #16611852  Like i said i have no jpegs at mo all raw files and most un processed in Lr, but i simply dont know how to adjust them as a jpeg in thier to 150 max for here,.. I don't know about LR4, but in LR5 it's File>Export... then choose destination, maximum file size, image size, etc.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 16, 2014 21:29 | #17 The best i can suggest - if i link to a previous post and save and re send, but wont that further downgrade IQ?, Could one of the mods do that for me transfer one of my earlier pics here so i could show what i meen?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
xarqi Cream of the Crop 10,435 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Aotearoa/New Zealand More info | Jan 16, 2014 21:32 | #18 Pagman wrote in post #16611942 The best i can suggest - if i link to a previous post and save and re send, but wont that further downgrade IQ?, Could one of the mods do that for me transfer one of my earlier pics here so i could show what i meen? P. I think the "artificial" look that is vexing you will be evident in a jpeg. It doesn't sound like a technical image quality problem that could be worsened by even repeated jpeg compression. My dollar is on lighting.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Point-n-shoot-n Goldmember 2,037 posts Likes: 1128 Joined Jun 2008 Location: Tampa, Florida More info | Jan 16, 2014 21:47 | #19 Check the camera settings to make sure you are shooting at the highest resolution and have the sharpening settings at or near the top. You may be having a focusing issue with your lens/camera combination. Try shooting at manual focus and see if anything changes as well. I would love to see a shot SOOC to see what the effect you are mentioning looks like! Canon 5D mk IV, Canon 5D mk iii, Canon 5d classic, Rebel XTI 400D 18-55 kit lens, Canon EF 85mm 1:1.8, Canon EF 17-40 F4L, Quantaray 70-300 1:4-5.6 LD, Canon 70-200 F2.8 iiL, Canon EF135 F2 L, Canon 200 F2 L, Tamron 28-75 1:2.8 , 2 alien bee 800's, 430 EXii, 580 EXii, rectangular and octo softboxes, assorted umbrellas, portable backdrops, radio triggers and still adding.............
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Here is the best pic to date i have taken i can post, taken strait from a raw in Lr 4.4 so my applogies for IQ...  Image hosted by forum (674030) © Pagman [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EverydayGetaway Cream of the Crop  More info | Jan 16, 2014 21:54 | #21 davidc502 wrote in post #16611931 Sony is the answer here. Sony's new high dynamic range sensors and growing line of sharp lenses should bring you over the top, where Canon and Nikon have let you down. I sincerely hope that's a joke... Fuji X-T3 // Fuji X-Pro2 (Full Spectrum) // Fuji X-H1 // Fuji X-T1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
545iBMW Senior Member  475 posts Likes: 3 Joined Apr 2008 More info | Jan 16, 2014 21:54 | #22 Pagman wrote in post #16611984 Here is the best pic to date i have taken i can post, taken strait from a raw in Lr 4.4 so my applogies for IQ... P The problem I see here is composition.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mgk2 Member 167 posts Joined Oct 2012 More info | Jan 16, 2014 21:57 | #23  Permanent ban545iBMW wrote in post #16611996 The problem I see here is composition. +1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kfreels Goldmember  4,297 posts Likes: 11 Joined Aug 2010 Location: Princeton, IN More info | Jan 16, 2014 21:57 | #24 not sure I understand the problem. This image has a lot of contrast. It's in bright mid-day sunlight. Other than a lack of composition I don't see anything technically wrong. I am serious....and don't call me Shirley.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sooc no pp at all.  Image hosted by forum (674031) © Pagman [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 16, 2014 22:00 | #26 The IQ is pretty good, for this scale photo. The color rendering is very good, the sharpness is there, well saturated but not overdone. Gerry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 16, 2014 22:07 | #27 I know the compo is rubbish in both but i was trying to show what to me looks like slightly inferior IQ considering what the photo has been through, the second one was with the camera just set to standard raw with no saturation,contrast or sharpening settings - just bland basic raw, then into Lr 4 and out again without any adjustments..
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Andrushka "all warm and fuzzy"  3,735 posts Likes: 12 Joined Oct 2007 Location: OC, CA More info | Jan 16, 2014 22:09 | #28  PermanentlyMaybe its your screen? These look kind of normal as far as SOOC random snaps http://www.paradigmphotographyoc.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 16, 2014 22:13 | #29 They look ok for starters to me. Your monitor may be off though... Gerry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
xarqi Cream of the Crop 10,435 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Aotearoa/New Zealand More info | Jan 16, 2014 22:34 | #30 I see no technical image quality problems either. There is a lot that could be done in post-processing however; maybe that's where you could look to explore and improve. If you were to enable the "Image editing OK" feature in your POTN user control panel, maybe we could have play and show you some variations you could try yourself.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1679 guests, 103 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
