I recently purchased the EF 70-200 2.8 IS II, does it make sense to add the 50mm 1.8 to this (cheap, light weighted)?
Anna1979 Hatchling 1 post Joined Jan 2014 More info | Jan 18, 2014 13:03 | #1 I recently purchased the EF 70-200 2.8 IS II, does it make sense to add the 50mm 1.8 to this (cheap, light weighted)?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lenspirate Goldmember 1,643 posts Likes: 36 Joined Aug 2008 More info | Jan 18, 2014 14:20 | #2 Sure why not? INSANE GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
xarqi Cream of the Crop 10,435 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Aotearoa/New Zealand More info | Jan 18, 2014 15:18 | #3 Only if you have a use for it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 18, 2014 22:12 | #4 50mm lenses are very useful in my opinion. I'd go for it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
melcat Goldmember 1,122 posts Likes: 5 Joined Nov 2010 Location: Melbourne, Australia More info | Jan 19, 2014 05:31 | #5 No, if you have to ask the question you will be agonising over whether to swap lenses when you're actually out and about photographing.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2511 guests, 102 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||