Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 18 Jan 2014 (Saturday) 17:22
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

15~85mm...fisheye?

 
Ace ­ and ­ Deuce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,749 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 468
Joined Feb 2012
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa.
     
Jan 18, 2014 17:22 |  #1

My question is, why is it that when I use my 15~85mm, the edges of the pic are 'rounded' or have a fisheye effect? here is what I mean...look at the vertical lines in the pics, the left and right side both angle inwards...

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

Day #17 - January 17, 2014 (external link) by Ace and Deuce (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

Night shot, between 3:30-4:30 a.m. (external link) by Ace and Deuce (external link), on Flickr

At first I thought it was because I was using a crop-sensor camera, but it's an EF-S lens, so that doesn't make sense. Sometimes I think the effect is cool, sometimes it frustrates me, lol.

Any help?

Thanks,

~Ace

GEAR LIST

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,689 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 1073
Joined Aug 2009
     
Jan 18, 2014 17:24 |  #2

Were you aiming the camera upward by any chance?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scatterbrained
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,511 posts
Gallery: 267 photos
Best ofs: 12
Likes: 4607
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Yomitan, Okinawa, Japan
     
Jan 18, 2014 17:24 |  #3

Perspective distortion, you're too close to the objects. I bet if you backed up a bit and got the camera higher off the ground things would straighten out a bit. ;)


VanillaImaging.com (external link)"Vacuous images for the Vapid consumer"
500px (external link)
flickr (external link)
1x (external link)
instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
msowsun
"approx 8mm"
Avatar
9,317 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 415
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Peterborough Ont. Canada
     
Jan 18, 2014 18:39 |  #4

mike_d wrote in post #16616546 (external link)
Were you aiming the camera upward by any chance?

Yes, if you have the camera level, you won't see the buildings leaning like that. It will be hard to get the same composition but unless you use tilt/shift lenses, it is the only way to get rid of those leaning buildings.


Mike Sowsun / SL1 / 80D / EF-S 24mm STM / EF-S 10-18mm STM / EF-S 18-55mm STM / EF-S 15-85mm USM / EF-S 55-250mm STM / 5D3 / Samyang 14mm 2.8 / EF 40mm 2.8 STM / EF 50mm 1.4 USM / EF 100mm 2.0 USM / EF 100mm 2.8 USM Macro / EF 24-105mm IS / EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS Mk II / EF 100-400 II / EF 1.4x II
Full Current and Previously Owned Gear List over 40 years Flickr Photostream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ace ­ and ­ Deuce
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,749 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 468
Joined Feb 2012
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa.
     
Jan 18, 2014 18:49 |  #5

Hmmm, the first one I was shooting from below the church, but the second one I was on a flat surface, on a tripod raised up the whole way, 72", shooting pretty level, and as you can tell, I'm not all that close.

I realized it was doing it quite a while ago, and sometimes I actually try to get the effect, like below...

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

4459 (external link) by Ace and Deuce (external link), on Flickr

I have a lot of pics where it's pretty cool, but these two recent church pics kind of threw me a bit, and I'm not so sure I'm a fan of the effect. I was just wondering if this was a 'normal' thing since I never noticed it with another lens.

Thanks,

~Ace

GEAR LIST

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scatterbrained
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,511 posts
Gallery: 267 photos
Best ofs: 12
Likes: 4607
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Yomitan, Okinawa, Japan
     
Jan 18, 2014 18:59 |  #6

It's perspective distortion, pretty standard for wide angle lenses.


VanillaImaging.com (external link)"Vacuous images for the Vapid consumer"
500px (external link)
flickr (external link)
1x (external link)
instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ace ­ and ­ Deuce
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,749 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 468
Joined Feb 2012
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa.
     
Jan 18, 2014 19:02 |  #7

OK, cool, I was just hoping there wasn't something wrong with the lens.

Thanks!!!

~Ace


GEAR LIST

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lbsimon
...never exercised in my life
Avatar
2,685 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 272
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Boston, MA
     
Jan 18, 2014 19:02 |  #8

Lightroom can fix this effect to a degree.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ace ­ and ­ Deuce
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,749 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 468
Joined Feb 2012
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa.
     
Jan 18, 2014 19:06 |  #9

I saw a tutorial about using perspective in CS6 but I haven't tried it. I just wanted to see if there was a way to prevent it or if it was a lens malfunction of sorts. I didn't think the 15~85 was considered a 'wide angle' lens like the 10-22 and such.


GEAR LIST

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lbsimon
...never exercised in my life
Avatar
2,685 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 272
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Boston, MA
     
Jan 18, 2014 19:20 |  #10

10-22 is what is known as "ultrawide angle". But even at 15mm the perspective distortion can be strong. A slight upward direction of the lens at this FL is going to show it. Just keep it in mind when shooting, and learn to fix it in post processing.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
yogestee
"my posts can be a little colourful"
Avatar
13,845 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 41
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Australia
     
Jan 18, 2014 23:30 as a reply to  @ Lbsimon's post |  #11

Wide angle distortion.


Jurgen
50D~EOS M50 MkII~EOS M~G11~S95~GoPro Hero4 Silver
http://www.pbase.com/j​urgentreue (external link)
The Title Fairy,, off with her head!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
xarqi
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,435 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Aotearoa/New Zealand
     
Jan 19, 2014 00:51 |  #12

OK - time for me to chime in just to make sure nobody gets confused here. No criticism intended of the posters above; it's just a compulsion I have.

There is mention here of "wide angle distortion". It has to be stressed that this phrase is doubly misleading as the effect being described is neither truly a distortion, nor is it caused by wide angle lenses.

What it is is the normal operation of perspective emphasised by close proximity to the subject.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PH68
Senior Member
Avatar
614 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 63
Joined Jun 2013
Location: England
     
Jan 19, 2014 05:31 |  #13

It's standard on any lens.
It all depends on how far you are from the subject.

It's just becomes more noticeable the "wider" the focal length.


5Diii | 28/1.8 | 50/1.4 | 100/2.8L | 300/4L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
xarqi
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,435 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Aotearoa/New Zealand
     
Jan 19, 2014 05:40 |  #14

PH68 wrote in post #16617679 (external link)
It's standard on any lens.
It all depends on how far you are from the subject.

It's just becomes more noticeable the "wider" the focal length.

Not quite. It becomes more noticeable the closer you stand regardless of how wide the lens is.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pulsar123
Goldmember
2,235 posts
Gallery: 82 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 870
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Canada
     
Jan 19, 2014 05:50 |  #15

xarqi wrote in post #16617687 (external link)
Not quite. It becomes more noticeable the closer you stand regardless of how wide the lens is.

Wrong. If you stand close with a non-wide angle lens (think telephoto), you won't see the effect. You have to be both (a) standing close, an (b) using a fairly wide angle lens, to see strong perspective effect.


6D (normal), 6D (full spectrum), Tamron 24-70 f2.8 VC, 135L, 70-200 f4L, 50mm f1.8 STM, Samyang 8mm fisheye, home studio, Fast Stacker

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,051 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
15~85mm...fisheye?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
992 guests, 117 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.