Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 19 Jan 2014 (Sunday) 21:41
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Where to have pics developed.

 
ItsJustEd
Senior Member
Avatar
433 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 20
Joined Jan 2012
Location: St. Petersburg FL
     
Jan 19, 2014 21:41 |  #1

So Im encountering a small headache. I have been to the typical local places to get my pics developed. Problem Im having is size. None of the editing hardware in the places allows me to print the entire pic,its cropping so much of it that its spoiling the photo. For example the bridge here is having both ends of the expanse cropped (tho this particulat shot is not the best example as one end is cropped - but the other shots are almost the entire bridge).

So,where do you go? Where do you recomend? I just want a simple 8X10 of the entire pic,doesnt matter what it is - bridge,landscape,whate​ver.

IMAGE: http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8403/8679958106_d6bc206923_c.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/77024467@N03/8​679958106/  (external link)
BEST KEYBRIDGE (external link) by EdDorsett (external link), on Flickr

I used to think I was indecisive,but now I'm not too sure.
5DMkI 60D Canon 24-105 Canon 17-55mm Tamron 70-300
More of me http://www.flickr.com/​photos/77024467@N03/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,690 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 1074
Joined Aug 2009
     
Jan 19, 2014 22:06 |  #2

The picture posted has an aspect ratio of 1.78, making it much wider than a 4x6 or 5x7, or 8x10, all of which will chop off the left and right edges to make it fit. To make it fit on standard paper without losing the edges, you'll have to make an 8x10 canvas in Photoshop and paste the picture into it. This will leave white space above and below. You'll then have to trim it and make a custom matte for framing. For future shots, you can shoot wider than needed, and crop it yourself to whatever print size you need. At least then you're in control of the crop instead of the printer's computer.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeremyKPhoto
Goldmember
1,634 posts
Likes: 46
Joined Apr 2012
     
Jan 19, 2014 22:19 |  #3

I have my pictures printed at Costco. To print this in an 8x10 you will have to do something like the following.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2014/01/3/LQ_674352.jpg
Image hosted by forum (674352) © JeremyKPhoto [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

5D Mark III / 70-200 2.8L IS II / 24-105L / 50 1.8 stm / Tamron 70-300 VC / Sigma 85mm 1.4 Art

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ernst-Ulrich ­ Schafer
Senior Member
Avatar
253 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Port Angeleeeeeeees, WA
     
Jan 19, 2014 23:11 |  #4

Find some online labs I'm sure they can print customs sizes for ya. Shutterfly, Mpix, etc. etc.


Today is the Day: Ruth Bernhard

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,690 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 1074
Joined Aug 2009
     
Jan 19, 2014 23:14 |  #5

Ernst-Ulrich Schafer wrote in post #16619940 (external link)
Find some online labs I'm sure they can print customs sizes for ya. Shutterfly, Mpix, etc. etc.

But he said he wanted an 8x10. He can get an 8x14.24 or a 5.62x10, but not an 8x10 from that image without cropping, matting, or squishing.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrianS
Senior Member
Avatar
412 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
     
Jan 20, 2014 00:28 as a reply to  @ mike_d's post |  #6

I had similar issues at first since I use a M43 camera, I ended up using Photoworks in San Francisco. They allow for other sizes but instead of forcing you to crop they will include a white border. So for M43 I got white borders on the top and bottom since it was still printed on a 2:3 format paper. Not sure if that will work for you.


Canon 5D3, Leica M6, Fujifilm x100 & Olympus E-M5 | Walkabout Street (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ItsJustEd
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
433 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 20
Joined Jan 2012
Location: St. Petersburg FL
     
Jan 20, 2014 14:05 |  #7

Thanks bunches fellas! As I was reading I realized what I was doing wrong - the above photo would in fact be difficult to do in 8X10 (unless it were cropped to accomodate that size,but that ruins the shot) as it is. I need to do some other editing before printing. 8X14 or something along those lines is what I actually need. Maybe even 10X16? I dont mind the dark borders (upper and lower),just want the entire expanse.

Thanks for the input and insite :)


I used to think I was indecisive,but now I'm not too sure.
5DMkI 60D Canon 24-105 Canon 17-55mm Tamron 70-300
More of me http://www.flickr.com/​photos/77024467@N03/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TooManyShots
Cream of the Crop
10,203 posts
Likes: 532
Joined Jan 2008
Location: NYC
     
Jan 20, 2014 15:06 |  #8
bannedPermanent ban

You meant having them printed.... You develop films.


One Imaging Photography (external link) and my Flickr (external link)
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAl007
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,119 posts
Gallery: 556 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1682
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK.
     
Jan 20, 2014 17:03 |  #9

Could I also suggest that having the water flow uphill is very disconcerting? I would at least make an effort to level the horizon so that the ground was level, and the verticals vertical.

Alan


alanevans.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ItsJustEd
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
433 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 20
Joined Jan 2012
Location: St. Petersburg FL
     
Jan 20, 2014 20:14 |  #10

BigAl007 wrote in post #16621897 (external link)
Could I also suggest that having the water flow uphill is very disconcerting? I would at least make an effort to level the horizon so that the ground was level, and the verticals vertical.

Alan

My location to take the shot dictates the angles. Im under the bridge trying to get as much of it in the frame as possible. I personally like how it looks. But,your observation has been duly noted ;)


I used to think I was indecisive,but now I'm not too sure.
5DMkI 60D Canon 24-105 Canon 17-55mm Tamron 70-300
More of me http://www.flickr.com/​photos/77024467@N03/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ItsJustEd
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
433 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 20
Joined Jan 2012
Location: St. Petersburg FL
     
Jan 20, 2014 20:18 |  #11

TooManyShots wrote in post #16621579 (external link)
You meant having them printed.... You develop films.

Well,yes,printed and not developed. Sorry if my wording was misleading :p


I used to think I was indecisive,but now I'm not too sure.
5DMkI 60D Canon 24-105 Canon 17-55mm Tamron 70-300
More of me http://www.flickr.com/​photos/77024467@N03/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AZGeorge
Goldmember
Avatar
2,668 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 761
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Southen Arizona
     
Jan 21, 2014 14:52 |  #12

Here's your attractive image roughly leveled.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2014/01/3/LQ_674548.jpg
Image hosted by forum (674548) © AZGeorge [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

George
Democracy Dies in Darkness

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ItsJustEd
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
433 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 20
Joined Jan 2012
Location: St. Petersburg FL
     
Jan 21, 2014 14:56 |  #13

AZGeorge wrote in post #16624644 (external link)
Here's your attractive image roughly leveled.

Thank you!

Well,I must admit it does in fact look better leveled off a tad. And doing a quick comparison (scrolling up and down) I now feel encouraged to do the same with the original image. Better yet,when Im able I will go back to the bridge and pay closer attention to the horizon/water levels. My thanks to you George.


I used to think I was indecisive,but now I'm not too sure.
5DMkI 60D Canon 24-105 Canon 17-55mm Tamron 70-300
More of me http://www.flickr.com/​photos/77024467@N03/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,009 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Where to have pics developed.
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1033 guests, 163 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.