Yesterday's sunset at the Pacific ocean in Oregon. Single exposure, stacked 2 and 3 stop Lee filters.
Jan 20, 2014 16:00 | #1 Yesterday's sunset at the Pacific ocean in Oregon. Single exposure, stacked 2 and 3 stop Lee filters. Sony A7r
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Numenorean Cream of the Crop 5,013 posts Likes: 28 Joined Feb 2011 More info | Jan 20, 2014 16:05 | #2 Your focus seems off - the rock should be better in focus and the DOF is too thin for this show IMO.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
S.R.M. Goldmember 2,802 posts Gallery: 724 photos Best ofs: 4 Likes: 14174 Joined Feb 2011 Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia More info | Jan 20, 2014 16:46 | #3 Lovely colours! Stephen ----- flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Snydremark my very own Lightrules moment More info | Jan 20, 2014 16:50 | #4 VERY nicely done! - Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 20, 2014 17:19 | #5 Numenorean wrote in post #16621740 Your focus seems off - the rock should be better in focus and the DOF is too thin for this show IMO. I noticed this too. The reason is that the lens was on "auto focus", something I rarely use. The angle was very low, and the camera was almost buried in the send, so honestly I didn't feel like lying on that wet sand. Instead, I simply let the lens and camera do the work and choose the focus. Well, the price was as you noted, the out-of-focus rock. But since I didn't have any better images of yesterday, I had decided to post this one regardless. I was also prepared for the critiques. Sony A7r
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jaharris1001 Goldmember 2,199 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2007 More info | Jan 20, 2014 18:11 | #6 lovely colors, I agree the first is a tad soft especially by the horizon, what F stop did you use ? Jim
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 20, 2014 18:42 | #7 jaharris1001 wrote in post #16622075 lovely colors, I agree the first is a tad soft especially by the horizon, what F stop did you use ? f/9 as I normally do with most of my landscape shots. I think what happened with DOF here is that the camera was too close to the rock (about 10-15 inches from the rock!) and that send formation in the foreground. It obviously got "confused" to what to focus on. So, I don't think it is a true DOF problem, because f/9 is plenty good to cover the whole frame, but the focus was all messed up and that created problems. Too bad and hopefully I get a second chance soon. Next time I will bring waterproof clothes so I can lie down on the send, not worrying about getting wet and dirty. Sony A7r
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bdillon Senior Member 693 posts Likes: 4 Joined Jun 2011 More info | Jan 20, 2014 22:03 | #8 Where was this taken?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
chadmcm Senior Member 337 posts Likes: 72 Joined May 2008 Location: Vancouver, Washington More info | Jan 20, 2014 22:28 | #9 Rub it in. I was there a week earlier. Great storm, but only had my camera out twice. Got this one, though, so it wasn't all wasted. Chad McMurry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 20, 2014 23:04 | #10 bdillon wrote in post #16622660 Where was this taken? Lincoln City, OR. Sony A7r
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 20, 2014 23:07 | #11 chadmcm wrote in post #16622719 Rub it in. I was there a week earlier. Great storm, but only had my camera out twice. Got this one, though, so it wasn't all wasted. Chad, out of curiosity, is there a particular reason you went with a B&W version of the shot? It seems you had some nice light, so wonder why you chose not to show it in color? Sony A7r
LOG IN TO REPLY |
paul3221 Goldmember 2,468 posts Likes: 153 Joined Apr 2010 Location: Phoenix, AZ More info | Jan 21, 2014 08:12 | #12 Great shots. Paul
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cerett Senior Member 823 posts Likes: 240 Joined Jun 2013 Location: Santa Ana, California More info | Jan 21, 2014 10:00 | #13 et078 wrote in post #16621932 I noticed this too. The reason is that the lens was on "auto focus", something I rarely use. The angle was very low, and the camera was almost buried in the send, so honestly I didn't feel like lying on that wet sand. Instead, I simply let the lens and camera do the work and choose the focus. Well, the price was as you noted, the out-of-focus rock. But since I didn't have any better images of yesterday, I had decided to post this one regardless. I was also prepared for the critiques. ![]() Thanks for pointing this out and noticing it. Actually, I had captured this too, but I think the above image is compositionaly stronger, minus the out of focus and DOF problem: ![]() Regardless, the composition on the first two images is excellent. Yeah, I tend to use AF less and less with landscapes, especially when there is an interesting foreground subject. https://www.martinfeldmanphotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
chadmcm Senior Member 337 posts Likes: 72 Joined May 2008 Location: Vancouver, Washington More info | Jan 21, 2014 16:01 | #14 It's not black and white. No desaturation, no B/W conversion. That's the light there was that day. Like I said, night and day difference from your shots last weekend. BTW, my shot was also taken in Lincoln City. et078 wrote in post #16622810 Chad, out of curiosity, is there a particular reason you went with a B&W version of the shot? It seems you had some nice light, so wonder why you chose not to show it in color? Chad McMurry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Cytoxan Member 33 posts Joined Jan 2011 Location: La Quinta, CA More info | Jan 22, 2014 11:57 | #15 Now thats a lovely scene
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Monkeytoes 1351 guests, 190 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||