Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Birds 
Thread started 06 Feb 2014 (Thursday) 00:41
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Bald eagles on a Cell Tower

 
KirkS518
Goldmember
Avatar
3,983 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Central Gulf Coast, Flori-duh
     
Feb 06, 2014 00:41 |  #1

The only bald eagles that I have seen in my urban area are a family atop a cell phone tower. The tower is 160.1 feet tall. I only just discovered them the other day, and haven't had a chance to go back with my camera. My longest lens is my Tamron 70-300 VC. Will this be long enough? I do have a Sigma 135-400mm coming on Friday, as well as a Tamron 200-400mm. For that distance, will any of those have enough reach at that distance? Quick triangulation math gives me an estimated distance to the birds of about 360 feet. Would I be wasting my time, or is it worth trying?


If steroids are illegal for athletes, should PS be illegal for models?
Digital - 50D, 20D IR Conv, 9 Lenses from 8mm to 300mm
Analog - Mamiya RB67 Pro-SD, Canon A-1, Nikon F4S, YashicaMat 124G, Rollei 35S, QL17 GIII, Zeiss Ikon Ikoflex 1st Version, and and entire room full of lenses and other stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5573
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Feb 06, 2014 00:51 |  #2

I'd use one of the 400s and see what you get. That's a fair way up, but still possible to get something out of it.

And, just because that sounds *mildly* unusual, are you certain you've got eagles up there and not osprey? In the urban areas, it's normally osprey building nests in the cell towers...the towers don't normally allow the nest structure that eagles prefer to build.

EDIT: As an example, this is a heavy crop from 400mm, at about 280/300ft from the road
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/snydremark/4836​304374/ (external link)


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
1Tanker
Goldmember
Avatar
4,470 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Swaying to the Symphony of Destruction
     
Feb 06, 2014 01:50 as a reply to  @ Snydremark's post |  #3

300 isn't really going to be worth it, from ~350'. Depending where you shoot from, it might just be an unflattering angle anyways.. if you're almost directly below. You don't want a pic of their underside. ;)

I shoot GBH's often from ~300 feet (with 420mm on crop), and have to crop over 50%. Osprey' (similar size to an Eagle), from 100' i have to crop fairly hard.


IMAGE: http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3736/9947894434_910342184a_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/1tanker/9947894​434/  (external link)
Sunlit Osprey (external link) by 1Tanker (external link), on Flickr


This Osprey is a good 150' away (420mm). >50% crop.

Yes, i know the highlights are blown. :oops:

Kel
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KirkS518
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,983 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Central Gulf Coast, Flori-duh
     
Feb 06, 2014 02:01 |  #4

Snydremark wrote in post #16667268 (external link)
And, just because that sounds *mildly* unusual, are you certain you've got eagles up there and not osprey? In the urban areas, it's normally osprey building nests in the cell towers...the towers don't normally allow the nest structure that eagles prefer to build.

It's a documented nest, and I (finally) got to actually see them the other day. Florida (and other states maybe) has this site - https://public.myfwc.c​om …s/nestlocator.a​spx#search (external link)
which lets you put in a zip or address, and a radius, and it shows you known nests, with activity data. The cell tower one I have found, and can get to. Here's the map of it (it's the northern one).

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2014/02/1/LQ_676222.jpg
Image hosted by forum (676222) © KirkS518 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

If steroids are illegal for athletes, should PS be illegal for models?
Digital - 50D, 20D IR Conv, 9 Lenses from 8mm to 300mm
Analog - Mamiya RB67 Pro-SD, Canon A-1, Nikon F4S, YashicaMat 124G, Rollei 35S, QL17 GIII, Zeiss Ikon Ikoflex 1st Version, and and entire room full of lenses and other stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KirkS518
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,983 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Central Gulf Coast, Flori-duh
     
Feb 06, 2014 02:13 |  #5

Here is the cell tower from google maps. It's right on a busy street, in a residential/industrial area. The nest used to be a few blocks over in a large cemetery, but they moved to the tower about a year ago. Weird.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2014/02/1/LQ_676223.jpg
Image hosted by forum (676223) © KirkS518 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

If steroids are illegal for athletes, should PS be illegal for models?
Digital - 50D, 20D IR Conv, 9 Lenses from 8mm to 300mm
Analog - Mamiya RB67 Pro-SD, Canon A-1, Nikon F4S, YashicaMat 124G, Rollei 35S, QL17 GIII, Zeiss Ikon Ikoflex 1st Version, and and entire room full of lenses and other stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5573
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Feb 06, 2014 09:32 |  #6

Wow...you ain't kiddin' that's weird :| Very interesting, thanks!


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Evan
Goldmember
Avatar
1,327 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Oregon
     
Feb 09, 2014 13:45 |  #7

Snydremark wrote in post #16667911 (external link)
Wow...you ain't kiddin' that's weird :| Very interesting, thanks!

Eagles will nest on anything tall that is able to support the weight of their nests. In the Columbia George they will nest on the rock faces if no large trees are around. I would think that in a place as flat as Florida, a cell tower would be perfect.

@OP

Even if you were to get close enough, the images aren't going to be very photographically pleasing because you will be looking nearly straight up. I would find out where Bald Eagles are seen frequently feeding in Florida and target those locations instead. Cell towers aren't going to make great pictures.


--
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,121 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Bald eagles on a Cell Tower
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Birds 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1053 guests, 104 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.