The image quality of this lens is too poor for portrait photograph?
5D3ismydream Member 160 posts Joined Jan 2014 More info | Feb 06, 2014 09:45 | #1 Permanent banThe image quality of this lens is too poor for portrait photograph?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | Feb 06, 2014 10:11 | #2 5D3ismydream wrote in post #16667941 The image quality of this lens is too poor for portrait photograph? Its not too poor, but neither is it ideal. Its not the easiest lens to handhold, at shorter focal lengths it doesnt produce the shallow depth of field you might want for portraits, and at longer focal lengths you have to work some distance from your subject. So most of us opt for other lenses for portraits. Most of the issues are not with image quality, but rather the nature of the lens.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mikeinctown Goldmember 2,119 posts Likes: 235 Joined May 2012 Location: Cleveland, Ohio More info | Feb 06, 2014 11:46 | #3 Easily put, it isn't the best tool for the job. It is like trying to pound in a nail with the end of a screwdriver instead of using a hammer. Will it work? Most likely you can make it work, but there are better tools suited for the task at hand.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
watt100 Cream of the Crop 14,021 posts Likes: 34 Joined Jun 2008 More info | Feb 06, 2014 12:10 | #4 5D3ismydream wrote in post #16667941 The image quality of this lens is too poor for portrait photograph? actually the image quality of the 100-400 is good for portrait photography --- but it's a little long for indoors (and not 'fast')
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is zachary24 1324 guests, 124 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||