Just wondering what kind of sharpening techniques everyone uses for processing photos.......i have heard of some using lab sharpening.....and some others.........or is it better to just use unsharp mask or smart sharpen?
Feb 06, 2006 21:18 | #1 Just wondering what kind of sharpening techniques everyone uses for processing photos.......i have heard of some using lab sharpening.....and some others.........or is it better to just use unsharp mask or smart sharpen? Canon EOS R,CANON 5D, EF17-40MM f4L,EF85MM F1.8 , Sigma 50MM F1.4 , 70-200MM F2.8, RF35MM F1.8, EF100MM F2.8 USM L.,kenko pro 300 1.4 teleconverter
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lostdoggy King Duffus 4,787 posts Joined Aug 2004 Location: Queens, NY More info | Feb 06, 2006 21:39 | #2 Check out this site for PS plugins:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cfcRebel Cream of the Crop 10,252 posts Joined Feb 2005 Location: Austin, TX More info | Feb 06, 2006 21:47 | #3 I use the TLR Professional Sharpening Toolkit scripts. http://thelightsrightstudio.com …onalSharpeningToolkit.htm Fee
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wcbert33 Member 93 posts Joined Mar 2005 Location: New York City More info | Feb 07, 2006 13:33 | #4 I used PK-Sharpener, http://www.pixelgenius.com/products.html http://WilliamBert.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jfrancho Cream of the Crop 6,341 posts Joined Feb 2005 More info | Feb 07, 2006 13:43 | #5 TLR does all that and more, and it can be setup to run silent batches. Oh yeah, and it's free.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wcbert33 Member 93 posts Joined Mar 2005 Location: New York City More info | Feb 07, 2006 15:13 | #6 TLR took its ideas for its product right from PK-Sharpener. TLR even uses the same names found in PK-Sharpener to describe the type of sharpening it does. I do see many photographers, mostly Pros are not recommending TLR while they recommended PK-Sharpener. Must indicate a PK-Sharpener is a better product since they are using a product you have to pay for than the one that is free. http://WilliamBert.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
subtle_spectre Goldmember 1,657 posts Joined Aug 2005 More info | Feb 07, 2006 15:17 | #7 For run of the mill stuff USM always does me well, although I have started earnestly using USM in Lab mode with staisfying results. I have the PK appy and use it quite a bit, as well...especially the Easter Egg!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cfcRebel Cream of the Crop 10,252 posts Joined Feb 2005 Location: Austin, TX More info | jfrancho wrote: TLR does all that and more, and it can be setup to run silent batches. Oh yeah, and it's free. Hi jfrancho, Fee
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jfrancho Cream of the Crop 6,341 posts Joined Feb 2005 More info | wcbert33 wrote: TLR took its ideas for its product right from PK-Sharpener. TLR even uses the same names found in PK-Sharpener to describe the type of sharpening it does. I do see many photographers, mostly Pros are not recommending TLR while they recommended PK-Sharpener. Must indicate a PK-Sharpener is a better product since they are using a product you have to pay for than the one that is free. Bill This simply isn't true at all. TLR was a result of unanswered questions about how PK worked. For details, see here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2456 guests, 105 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||