Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 08 Feb 2014 (Saturday) 14:38
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Club & allround photography : 24-105 f4L IS vs Tamron 24-70 2.8 VC ?

 
CanonYouCan
Goldmember
Avatar
1,489 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 22
Joined Oct 2010
Location: Belgium
     
Feb 08, 2014 14:38 |  #1

Clubphotography (party with lighteffects) is always with external flash so I don't need f2.8, both lenses have IS/VC for filming also. For this there seams to be an advantage for the Canon.

Concerning allround photography (daytrip family like Disneyland,...) is there a big difference in IQ/Bokeh between the 2 for portraits the Tamron f2.8 vs the Canon f4?

Is the f4 bokeh nervous or can you compensate with the extra longer focal range between 70-105 to make the background more washed out ? Longer focal length makes the bokeh softer or more washed out I heard once.

I had the 24-105 long time ago, I do remember it suffered a lot of correctable vignetting.


Sony A7 III | Metabones V | Sigma 35 1.4 Art | Sigma 85 1.4 Art | 70-200 2.8L II
Lighting : Godox AD600B TTL + Godox V860II-S + X1T-S
Modifiers: 60cm Collapsible Silver Beautydish + grid | Godox 120cm Octagon softbox + grid + Speedlite Flash bender
Tripod: Vanguard Alta 253CT carbon

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kin2son
Goldmember
4,546 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Feb 08, 2014 15:35 |  #2
bannedPermanent ban

I'll always prefer a fast aperture zoom over a slow one.


5D3 Gripped / 17-40L / Σ35 / 40 Pancake / Zeiss 50 MP / Σ85 / 100L Macro / 70-200 f2.8L II IS / 430 EX II / 580 EX II / Canon 2xIII TC / Kenko Ext. Tubes
EOS M / EF-M 18-55 / EF-M 22f2 / Ricoh GR aka Ultimate street camera :p
Flickr (external link) | My Images on Getty®‎ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CanonYouCan
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,489 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 22
Joined Oct 2010
Location: Belgium
     
Feb 08, 2014 15:42 as a reply to  @ kin2son's post |  #3

Just found the answer : Tamron 24-70 2.8 VC really it the best despite the smaller range, just don't let it fall bad like in the end :-D

http://www.youtube.com​/watch?v=QMU1YPO_mXA (external link)
If you check the review with the IQ differences, you feel the 24-105 really needs an update.
So i'll stick with the Tamron.


Sony A7 III | Metabones V | Sigma 35 1.4 Art | Sigma 85 1.4 Art | 70-200 2.8L II
Lighting : Godox AD600B TTL + Godox V860II-S + X1T-S
Modifiers: 60cm Collapsible Silver Beautydish + grid | Godox 120cm Octagon softbox + grid + Speedlite Flash bender
Tripod: Vanguard Alta 253CT carbon

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Avatar
11,091 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 2795
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Feb 08, 2014 18:55 |  #4

I'm extremely impressed with my Tamron after it came back from service. VERY sharp.


A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
My Gear Archive

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MichaelSwiss
Member
Avatar
66 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 172
Joined Oct 2010
Location: Hong Kong
     
Feb 09, 2014 04:07 |  #5

Talley wrote in post #16674693 (external link)
I'm extremely impressed with my Tamron after it came back from service. VERY sharp.

Why did it need Service ? :-)


Glass, Glass and Glass.. and some bodies...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Avatar
11,091 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 2795
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Feb 09, 2014 11:06 |  #6

MichaelSwiss wrote in post #16675404 (external link)
Why did it need Service ? :-)

https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1356250


A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
My Gear Archive

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bianchi
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,775 posts
Gallery: 41 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 29534
Joined Jan 2010
Location: USA
     
Feb 09, 2014 17:00 |  #7

Talley wrote in post #16674693 (external link)
I'm extremely impressed with my Tamron after it came back from service. VERY sharp.

What was the turn around time..

Considering it


My Gear flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Avatar
11,091 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 2795
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Feb 09, 2014 17:12 |  #8

Bianchi wrote in post #16676706 (external link)
What was the turn around time..

Considering it

one week exactly from the time they recieved it from the time i received it. very impressed.


A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
My Gear Archive

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dave_bass5
Goldmember
Avatar
4,329 posts
Gallery: 34 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 303
Joined Apr 2005
Location: London, centre of the universe
     
Feb 11, 2014 08:44 |  #9

I had two copies of the Tamron, both had to go back, but other than the (same) fault i was very happy with them...except for the AF speed.
On paper the Tamron looks like a winner, but comparing it to my 24-105L i was getting less keepers in low light, and a lot less in AI Servo mode. The Tamron just couldn't keep up with my 5DMKIII in servo mode, even in good light.
At home i found AF to be off when shooting in low light, but all proper focus tests (FoCal, Moire test) showed it was fine, so it became too unreliable.

As the OP mentions low light club photography i thought i would post my thoughts and experience.


Dave.
Gallery@http://www.flickr.com/​photos/davebass5/ (external link)
Canon R7 | Canon EOS-M50 | Canon 24-70 f/2.8L MKII | 70-300L | 135L f/2.0 | EF-S 10-18 | 40 f/2.8 STM | 35mm f/2 IS | Canon S110 | Fuji F31FD | Canon 580EXII, 270EXII | Yongnuo YN-622C Triggers.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,059 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Club & allround photography : 24-105 f4L IS vs Tamron 24-70 2.8 VC ?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1918 guests, 101 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.