Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 12 Feb 2014 (Wednesday) 05:58
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Sigma 50-150mm f2.8 OS user opinions

 
MedicinSC
Goldmember
Avatar
1,394 posts
Gallery: 37 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 273
Joined Aug 2011
Location: Beaufort, SC
     
Apr 01, 2014 13:32 |  #31

gremlin75 wrote in post #16801927 (external link)
Having owned both the sigma 70-200 OS and the sigma 50-150 OS I can say that the 50-150 OS had better IQ wide open and, depending on what you shoot, is more versital on a crop camera. If you want a 70-200 then I'd suggest the tamron VC over the sigma OS

The going ff options is something I struggled with as well. FF is constantly getting less expensive but what offset it for me was the fact that sigma had two amazing crop lenses (18-35 and 50-150) so that cemented me in the crop category for the forseeable future :D

But that's just me. Go over what ff will offer you over a crop body and if te cost difference (both in bodies and lenses) is worth it to you.

I've toyed with the idea of the 17-50 and the 50-150. The only things full frame really offers is a better choice of lenses (variety) without having to worry about crop factor (ie., shooting room), and image quality (low light, dof, noise in general). I'm sure there are a few bells and whistles that I'm missing. But, as far as the variety of lenses, how many do we really need, right? I'm probably going with the 70-200, though, for the possibility that I may do full-frame in the future and for retaining value in the lens. I'd love to hear thoughts on this, however.

As far as Tamron vs Sigma... yeah, if I do the 70-200, Tamron was my first choice between the two. But there's a $300 difference in price. I'm not sure if the IQ is really worth that difference. It may be.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gremlin75
Goldmember
Avatar
2,738 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 226
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Apr 01, 2014 14:16 |  #32

MedicinSC wrote in post #16801940 (external link)
As far as Tamron vs Sigma... yeah, if I do the 70-200, Tamron was my first choice between the two. But there's a $300 difference in price. I'm not sure if the IQ is really worth that difference. It may be.

If you can, try out both and then decide. The sigme is ok wide open and by f4 it is great (I'd say the same IQ as the canon 70-200 f4 IS at f4). But by all reports the tamron VC is bested only by the canon 70-200 f2.8 IS II.

If you haven't already then check out the compairison that Tally did between the tamron, canon, and sigma. Then try both for yourself and see if the difference is with it ;)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MedicinSC
Goldmember
Avatar
1,394 posts
Gallery: 37 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 273
Joined Aug 2011
Location: Beaufort, SC
     
Apr 02, 2014 23:08 |  #33

gremlin75 wrote in post #16802030 (external link)
If you can, try out both and then decide. The sigme is ok wide open and by f4 it is great (I'd say the same IQ as the canon 70-200 f4 IS at f4). But by all reports the tamron VC is bested only by the canon 70-200 f2.8 IS II.

If you haven't already then check out the compairison that Tally did between the tamron, canon, and sigma. Then try both for yourself and see if the difference is with it ;)

I was impulsive and ordered the Sigma 70-200 today. It should be here tomorrow. I would love to have tried them out, personally, but I have no where that stocks them, close by. I'd have to rent them.

My reason for going with the 70 over the 50 is just the long term value of the lens. I just don't think the 50-150 would retain as much.

My reason for Sigma over Tamron is partially over price. But, it also has to do with the OS (VC, IS, whatever). With Sigma, it has the panning mode. So far as I know, the Tamron does not. And of course, the Canon is just way out of my budget.

I may pick up a 50-150 for my wife in the future, we'll see. I appreciate all the advice and feedback.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ in ­ Texas
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,090 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 193033
Joined Mar 2014
Location: SE Texas
     
Apr 03, 2014 07:19 |  #34

New here shooting a 60D and have this lens coming from B&H to be delivered today. Reviews I read on this lens were great so I'm hoping it lives up to the reviews. This one would meet my needs as good as the 70-200 would.


Bill being Smug (external link)
Bill's flickr (external link)
Sony a7, a1, a9, Sony Vario-Tessar T* FE 16-35mm F4 ZA OSS, Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS Lens, Tamron 70-180mm, F2.8 Di III VXD, Sony FE 200-600mm f/5.6-6,3 GM OSS, Sony FE 1.4X teleconverter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gremlin75
Goldmember
Avatar
2,738 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 226
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Apr 03, 2014 17:05 |  #35

MedicinSC wrote in post #16805866 (external link)
I may pick up a 50-150 for my wife in the future, we'll see. I appreciate all the advice and feedback.

Sigma discontinued the lens just recently so the only way to get it later might be used. Not that's that's a bad thing as used will always save at least a little money. There have been no indication of ten getting ready to release a replacement, but I'd like to think that a after the success of the 18-35 they might be looking at doing a 50-150 f2.....a boy can hope :)

The sigma 70-200 OS is still a very good lens. I hope you enjoy it!

Will in Tejas wrote in post #16806439 (external link)
New here shooting a 60D and have this lens coming from B&H to be delivered today. Reviews I read on this lens were great so I'm hoping it lives up to the reviews. This one would meet my needs as good as the 70-200 would.

It's one of te truly great crop camera lenses so enjoy and let us know what you think.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kfreels
Goldmember
Avatar
4,297 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Princeton, IN
     
Apr 03, 2014 17:15 |  #36

I absolutely love my SIgma 70-200 OS. One of my friends has the Tammy and at f2.8 mine is sharper and my AF and OS both outperform the Tammy. There's always some variation between lenses of course so each person's personal experience may differ but don't feel like you bought the wrong lens because some think the Tammy is sharper at f2.8.


I am serious....and don't call me Shirley.
Canon 7D and a bunch of other stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ian_socool
Goldmember
Avatar
1,849 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Likes: 185
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Brooklyn NY
     
Apr 11, 2014 09:49 |  #37

gremlin75 wrote in post #16807749 (external link)
Sigma discontinued the lens just recently so the only way to get it later might be used. Not that's that's a bad thing as used will always save at least a little money. There have been no indication of ten getting ready to release a replacement, but I'd like to think that a after the success of the 18-35 they might be looking at doing a 50-150 f2.....a boy can hope :)

The sigma 70-200 OS is still a very good lens. I hope you enjoy it!

It's one of te truly great crop camera lenses so enjoy and let us know what you think.

The guys at Sigma told me the price scared a lot of people off of the newer 50-150.


70D, 80D, SL1, Sigma 10-20 3.5, Σ30mm 1.4, 40mm 2.8 Pancake Σ70mm 2.8 EX DG Macro, Canon 17-55 2.8 IS, Σ85 1.4, Σ50-150mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM APO, Godox AD 200 X's 2, 430EX II X's 2, Yongnuo YN-560II X's 2, Cowboy Studio wireless flash triggers X4.Ian_socool FlickR (external link) Facebook fanpage (external link) http://ianlynphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gremlin75
Goldmember
Avatar
2,738 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 226
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Apr 12, 2014 11:51 |  #38

ian_socool wrote in post #16826113 (external link)
The guys at Sigma told me the price scared a lot of people off of the newer 50-150.

Whichever too bad since it is such an amazing lens. But I think most people look at it as just a couple hundred less then the 70-200, so not with it. But quality has a price and its a quality lens!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ian_socool
Goldmember
Avatar
1,849 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Likes: 185
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Brooklyn NY
     
Apr 12, 2014 15:55 |  #39

gremlin75 wrote in post #16828423 (external link)
Whichever too bad since it is such an amazing lens. But I think most people look at it as just a couple hundred less then the 70-200, so not with it. But quality has a price and its a quality lens!

I used the OS version at a trade show and fell in love with it. I was saving up for it when the guys at Sigma called me and told me they had some version II non OS refurbished for a great price


70D, 80D, SL1, Sigma 10-20 3.5, Σ30mm 1.4, 40mm 2.8 Pancake Σ70mm 2.8 EX DG Macro, Canon 17-55 2.8 IS, Σ85 1.4, Σ50-150mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM APO, Godox AD 200 X's 2, 430EX II X's 2, Yongnuo YN-560II X's 2, Cowboy Studio wireless flash triggers X4.Ian_socool FlickR (external link) Facebook fanpage (external link) http://ianlynphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hondafans
Goldmember
Avatar
2,536 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Floyds Knobs, IN
     
Jun 19, 2014 17:14 |  #40

Discontinued, really?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gremlin75
Goldmember
Avatar
2,738 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 226
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Jun 19, 2014 19:23 |  #41

hondafans wrote in post #16982173 (external link)
Discontinued, really?

Unfortunately so. Sigma announed it a little while ago :(




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ian_socool
Goldmember
Avatar
1,849 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Likes: 185
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Brooklyn NY
     
Jun 20, 2014 09:59 |  #42

I wonder if the price dropped then?


70D, 80D, SL1, Sigma 10-20 3.5, Σ30mm 1.4, 40mm 2.8 Pancake Σ70mm 2.8 EX DG Macro, Canon 17-55 2.8 IS, Σ85 1.4, Σ50-150mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM APO, Godox AD 200 X's 2, 430EX II X's 2, Yongnuo YN-560II X's 2, Cowboy Studio wireless flash triggers X4.Ian_socool FlickR (external link) Facebook fanpage (external link) http://ianlynphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ from ­ PA
Cream of the Crop
11,257 posts
Likes: 1526
Joined May 2003
Location: Southeast Pennsylvania
     
Jun 20, 2014 10:52 |  #43

gremlin75 wrote in post #16807749 (external link)
Sigma discontinued the lens just recently so the only way to get it later might be used.

B&H shows the Canon mount available for $969.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gremlin75
Goldmember
Avatar
2,738 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 226
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Jun 20, 2014 21:44 |  #44

John from PA wrote in post #16983574 (external link)
B&H shows the Canon mount available for $969.

Just because its diccontinued doesnt mean there still isnt stock available, just means they are not making any more.

http://www.slrlounge.c​om …le-replacements-incoming/ (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ian_socool
Goldmember
Avatar
1,849 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Likes: 185
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Brooklyn NY
     
Jun 23, 2014 00:19 |  #45

IMAGE: https://farm3.staticflickr.com/2937/14497380953_09dfc37e37_o.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/o65S​h2  (external link) IMG_5833-1_pp-1 (external link) by Nsoromma-Sankofa (external link), on Flickr

70D, 80D, SL1, Sigma 10-20 3.5, Σ30mm 1.4, 40mm 2.8 Pancake Σ70mm 2.8 EX DG Macro, Canon 17-55 2.8 IS, Σ85 1.4, Σ50-150mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM APO, Godox AD 200 X's 2, 430EX II X's 2, Yongnuo YN-560II X's 2, Cowboy Studio wireless flash triggers X4.Ian_socool FlickR (external link) Facebook fanpage (external link) http://ianlynphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

11,343 views & 0 likes for this thread, 19 members have posted to it.
Sigma 50-150mm f2.8 OS user opinions
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is johntmyers418
1248 guests, 177 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.