Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 13 Feb 2014 (Thursday) 12:41
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

60D vs 70D vs 7D - Low Light purchase?

 
mp0510
Hatchling
4 posts
Joined Feb 2014
     
Feb 13, 2014 12:41 |  #1

I want to buy a body I'll be using for the following scenarios and would like the thoughts and feedback of actual owners of these cameras.

1. Low Light - I want to shoot available light in dark environments (think churches, abandoned buildings, etc.) where the people might be active with decent depth of field. So I'm thinking f/4 - f/8, ISO 12800, 1/200. I want the best detail possible (hence the desire for a full frame).

2. Absolute razor sharp focus accuracy in good light/flash (ISO 100, f/1.8, 1/120). Not Live view or Manual, just standard auto-focus.

2. Ability to keep focus on moving objects that might shift away from the center focus point (BIF, football, car racing).

Budget-wise, the 60D seems the best choice, since it's available much cheaper. But it doesn't allow microfocus adjustments, which I would LIKE to have. The 7D has a reputation for great focus accuracy, but is older and I'm not sure how good the ISO 12,800 will compare to the 70D in real world situations. I have no idea how well any of these can focus in dim/dark environments (churches, etc.) with just available light.

Any thoughts? Experiences?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jocau
Goldmember
Avatar
1,838 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 338
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Belgium
     
Feb 13, 2014 12:45 |  #2

I don't own any of the mentioned cameras, but to be honest your description screams "5D3" because it ticks all the boxes.


550D | EF-S 18-55mm F/3.5-5.6 IS | EF 50mm F/1.8 II | EF 70-200mm F/4L IS | Speedlite 580EX II | LumoPro LP180 | Gitzo GT3541XLS | Arca-Swiss Monoball Z1 SP | ONA Bowery (black, non-leather) (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mp0510
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
4 posts
Joined Feb 2014
     
Feb 13, 2014 13:00 |  #3

You are 100% correct. But I'm looking for a budget alternative. Goal is to stay under $1500, which can be done on all 3. 6D is close, but the lack of focus points and supposed poor BIF focus drop it out of the running. So I'm looking at the 3 potential crop sensors instead.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ptcanon3ti
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,057 posts
Gallery: 613 photos
Best ofs: 16
Likes: 11724
Joined Sep 2012
Location: NJ
     
Feb 13, 2014 13:01 |  #4

70D


Paul
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/petshots/ (external link)
Body - Nikon D750
Lenses - Nikon 20 f1.8 / Nikon 16-35 f4 / Sigma 105 OS Macro / Sigma 24-105 f4 Art / Tamron 70-200 2.8 Di VC / Sigma 150-600 "S"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gnome ­ chompski
Goldmember
1,252 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 136
Joined Jun 2013
Location: oakland, ca
     
Feb 13, 2014 13:01 |  #5

yea, but even a full frame sensor wont guarantee razor sharp, crisp images at high ISO when the light is terrible.


Tumblr (external link)
Flickr (external link)
Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
moltengold
Goldmember
4,296 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Jul 2011
     
Feb 13, 2014 13:07 |  #6

gnome chompski wrote in post #16686884 (external link)
yea, but even a full frame sensor wont guarantee razor sharp, crisp images at high ISO when the light is terrible.

thats right

+1 for the 70D
or wait for the 7D Mark II


| Canon EOS | and some canon lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TJays
Goldmember
Avatar
1,400 posts
Likes: 289
Joined Mar 2013
Location: Los Angeles USA
     
Feb 13, 2014 13:23 |  #7

6D or 7D for your price range + add good glass, but it really rest in the hands of the person using the equipment.


Regards
Terri Jean

5D4 Gripped-EOS 1DX Markll -600mm/4.0 II L-35-350mm/3.5 L-70-200/2.8 L-24-70mm/2.8 L-85mm/1.2 II L-50mm/1.2 L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mark2009
Goldmember
Avatar
2,001 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 132
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Northeast , USA
     
Feb 13, 2014 13:27 as a reply to  @ TJays's post |  #8

I,had a 60d and now shoot a 7d.....if your talking iso12800, I would look into a used 6d....and some fast glass, f/2.8 stuff and primes f/1.8.....maybe a 85mm f/1.8




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EverydayGetaway
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,008 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 5400
Joined Oct 2012
Location: GA Mountains
     
Feb 13, 2014 14:06 |  #9

As jocau said, I'd keep saving for the 5Diii in your case. Otherwise the 70D is your best bet.

If you live in the states, go open a credit card with Best Buy. They will give you 18months zero interest financing and they price match Amazon. Pay the $1200-1500 you have now upfront, then put the rest on the card and enjoy the camera you really want.


Fuji X-T3 // Fuji X-Pro2 (Full Spectrum) // Fuji X-H1 // Fuji X-T1
flickr (external link) // Instagram (external link)www.LucasGPhoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,919 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14915
Joined Dec 2006
     
Feb 13, 2014 14:11 |  #10

I want a ferrari for the price of a yugo too. Your ISO desires are pretty much out there, even for the existing state of the art. The other two are more in the province of the 5dIII, but the 7D would get you the focus you want but the 7D wont have the ISO you want. Decide whether ISO or focus is the primary factor and then let that lead you to something within your budget. .




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
neacail
Goldmember
Avatar
1,188 posts
Gallery: 43 photos
Likes: 441
Joined Dec 2013
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
     
Feb 13, 2014 14:16 as a reply to  @ post 16687062 |  #11

12800? Not usable on any of those bodies, IMO. I'd only use it on my 6D if I was in a bind. I'll go up to 6400 if it is urgent on my 70D, but I really prefer not to go above 3200 with the 70D (6400 is my prefered max on the 6D).

If those really are the only options you're considering, the 70D seems like the clear choice to me. But, I don't actually think any of them are the right choice for you.


Shelley
Image Editing Okay

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EverydayGetaway
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,008 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 5400
Joined Oct 2012
Location: GA Mountains
     
Feb 13, 2014 14:19 |  #12

neacail wrote in post #16687078 (external link)
12800? Not usable on any of those bodies, IMO. I'd only use it on my 6D if I was in a bind. I'll go up to 6400 if it is urgent on my 70D, but I really prefer not to go above 3200 with the 70D (6400 is my prefered max on the 6D).

If those really are the only options you're considering, the 70D seems like the clear choice to me. But, I don't actually think any of them are the right choice for you.

I whole-heartedly disagree. I don't hesitate to use 12,800 on my 6D and have even used above that a few times and been satisfied with the results.

OP, browse this thread, you'll see that any of the bodies will be capable with a little PP (some more than others). I personally have been very impressed with what I've seen from the 70D, though I haven't shot with one.

https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1308983


Fuji X-T3 // Fuji X-Pro2 (Full Spectrum) // Fuji X-H1 // Fuji X-T1
flickr (external link) // Instagram (external link)www.LucasGPhoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrickR
Cream of the Crop
5,935 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Dallas TX
     
Feb 13, 2014 14:22 |  #13

If I knew I would be shooting 12800 I wouldn't even consider the 3 you mentioned. A used 6d would be my 1st choice. The 70d would be #2 if I absolutely couldn't get the 6d (but the price between the 2 is only a few hundred bucks used 6d vs new 70d). The 6d has the much better low light center AF point.

What good will razor sharp focus be if you get an image so noisy you can't use it? You would have ETTR with a crop sensor and do some serious work in post to try to save the image, where as with a 6d, the work will be minimal even properly exposed.


My junk
The grass isn't greener on the other side, it's green where you water it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mp0510
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
4 posts
Joined Feb 2014
     
Feb 13, 2014 14:30 as a reply to  @ EverydayGetaway's post |  #14

I'm not planning on spending a lot of time using 12,800. But I've seen a few times where I had to use 6400 and then push it in post, so would like 12,800 as an option.

Thanks for all the comments so far! It sounds like the 70D is the best choice, with the 7D and option. It's funny no one is even mentioning the 60D. I thought it would at least have a few positives. But at least this narrows down the choices.

The mentions of 5D3 bring up an alternative. (5D3 isn't an option now. I don't do credit cards. Cars and homes are the only things I buy on credit) What would you say comparing a used 5D2 to the 70D or 7D? Again, the biggest question being available light focus and shooting at high ISO. I think it's past what I want to spend, but every so often one pops up at a good price, so I figure I'll toss it in the mix for opinions.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
neacail
Goldmember
Avatar
1,188 posts
Gallery: 43 photos
Likes: 441
Joined Dec 2013
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
     
Feb 13, 2014 14:31 |  #15

EverydayGetaway wrote in post #16687085 (external link)
I whole-heartedly disagree. I don't hesitate to use 12,800 on my 6D and have even used above that a few times and been satisfied with the results.

OP, browse this thread, you'll see that any of the bodies will be capable with a little PP (some more than others). I personally have been very impressed with what I've seen from the 70D, though I haven't shot with one.

https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1308983

Don't get me wrong . . . the 70D is a great camera (I love mine). I use it mostly for shooting ice hockey in dimly lit arenas, and it is a great performer. But, the noise can be quite time consuming to clean up nicely at 6400. Especially when processing a lot of images.

I find the noise from the 6D much less offensive and cumbersome to deal with. I'd much rather clean up 6D noise at 12800 than 70D noise at 6400.


Shelley
Image Editing Okay

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

9,204 views & 0 likes for this thread, 24 members have posted to it and it is followed by 3 members.
60D vs 70D vs 7D - Low Light purchase?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1787 guests, 125 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.