Is anyone else surprised that Canon didn't introduce their RF wireless technology into their new ring light flash, MR-14EX II?
SunTsu Goldmember 1,593 posts Joined Dec 2006 Location: Westcoast, Canada More info | Feb 13, 2014 12:58 | #1 Is anyone else surprised that Canon didn't introduce their RF wireless technology into their new ring light flash, MR-14EX II? Canon 5D Mark II+BG-E6, Canon 5D+BG-E4 | 200-400mmL IS, 85mm F1.2L II, TS-E 17mm F4.0L , 16-35mm F2.8L II, 24-105mmL IS, 70-200mm [COLOR=#000000]F2.8L II IS, 100mm F2.8L Macro IS, 100mm F2.8 Macro, 40mm F2.8, 1.4x II, 2.0x III | EF12+25 II | Canon 600EX-RT (x5) | Gitzo support
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 13, 2014 13:11 | #2 Permanent banNot me. I'm actually thankful for that. 'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 13, 2014 13:14 | #3 Alveric wrote in post #16686914 Not me. I'm actually thankful for that. You're thankful there is no RF technology in addition to IR? Why is that? Canon 5D Mark II+BG-E6, Canon 5D+BG-E4 | 200-400mmL IS, 85mm F1.2L II, TS-E 17mm F4.0L , 16-35mm F2.8L II, 24-105mmL IS, 70-200mm [COLOR=#000000]F2.8L II IS, 100mm F2.8L Macro IS, 100mm F2.8 Macro, 40mm F2.8, 1.4x II, 2.0x III | EF12+25 II | Canon 600EX-RT (x5) | Gitzo support
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 13, 2014 13:17 | #4 Permanent banI'm happy they didn't include RF, which woulda jacked up the price, and I wouldn't have used it anyway. I can always plug the flash to my PW's and I'm lighting. 'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | Feb 13, 2014 13:45 | #5 Why would you want a radio feature built into what is essentially a flash designed to be a hotshoe flash. Perhaps one day when cameras have built in RF transmitters you could move the receiever out into the ringlight, but otherwise it makes no sense.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 13, 2014 14:04 | #6 gonzogolf wrote in post #16686986 Why would you want a radio feature built into what is essentially a flash designed to be a hotshoe flash. Perhaps one day when cameras have built in RF transmitters you could move the receiever out into the ringlight, but otherwise it makes no sense. You are missing the point. Canon 5D Mark II+BG-E6, Canon 5D+BG-E4 | 200-400mmL IS, 85mm F1.2L II, TS-E 17mm F4.0L , 16-35mm F2.8L II, 24-105mmL IS, 70-200mm [COLOR=#000000]F2.8L II IS, 100mm F2.8L Macro IS, 100mm F2.8 Macro, 40mm F2.8, 1.4x II, 2.0x III | EF12+25 II | Canon 600EX-RT (x5) | Gitzo support
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 13, 2014 14:11 | #7 Permanent banWell, had RF be included it would only have been Canon's own system. So, unless you're the proud owner of a 600EX-RT or two, you can't use it anyway. IR, on the other hand, is usable with most other speedlites and even 3rd party flashes. 'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 13, 2014 23:19 | #8 There is no need to up grade the MT-24 EX. They just need to build a small flash with RT Slave capability and use a 600EX-RT or ST-E3-RT as a Master. Build a mount with accessory arms to mount the Slave flashes and you have a nice Macro flash setup. RRS (Really Right Stuff) builds some nice macro components to where all you would need would be the small Slave flashes. I am not going to hold my breath for Canon to do something so simple as this but maybe Yongnuo or other third party might see the potential market. Rand
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 13, 2014 23:40 | #9 Permanent banI'm waiting to see how the MR-14X II measures up against the Mecablitz 15 MS-1. Been eyeing the latter for quite a while. Still needs a cable, though. 'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ccya965041 Member 103 posts Joined Jan 2012 Location: Hong Kong More info | Feb 14, 2014 00:38 | #10 I'm actually have the I version for MR-14EX,I'm curious this new model will have a big improvement or not,better to wait for the testing report for this Canon 40D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vengence Goldmember 2,103 posts Likes: 108 Joined Mar 2013 More info | Feb 14, 2014 09:18 | #11 I have to agree, I'm not seeing the reason to add the cost of the radio trigger to this one.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
apersson850 Obviously it's a good thing More info | Looks more like improved details than anything revolutionary. Anders
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry 1100 guests, 123 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||