A Rembrandt portrait

Hmmm.... I'm pretty sure traditional rembrendt lighting is short lit. Not broad lit.

Or is it just defined by the triangle of light on the cheek? Which seems absent here?

Still a nice portrait but not sure it is rembrandt lighting.

It's defined by the triangle on the opposing cheek

thedcmule2 wrote in post #16694501
It's defined by the triangle on the opposing cheek

^This

It's still a nice portrait.

Yeah, it's nice. But I wouldn't see it as a Rembrandt portrait necessarily.