Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 17 Feb 2014 (Monday) 11:07
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Question re.: Polarizing Filter

 
Bogino
Senior Member
Avatar
586 posts
Gallery: 45 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 374
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Southern California
     
Feb 17, 2014 11:07 |  #1

I am thinking of getting a Hoya Pro Polarizing Filter to put on my Canon 24-105mm lens. That lens is what I consider my all purpose walk around lens and will use it to shoot people, animals and landscapes. The reason I'm thinking of using the filter is mainly for the landscape photo's which I understand having the filter can improve picture quality. Here's my question: I recall several years ago I did have a wide angle Canon lens (since sold it) and I had a circular polarizing filter on it. I went to remove it prior to selling and it was an ordeal getting the damn thing off. The thing would just turn and turn and finally through some tips in these forums figured a way to get it off. Will I have the same problem again in this situation? Is removing a circular polarizing filter always an ordeal? Is it OK to just keep it on the lens at all times regardless of the subject matter I am shooting? Thoughts? Opinions? Thank You.


Canon 7D Mark II; Canon 70-300mm "L"; Canon 100mm Macro; Tamron 24-70mm; Tokina 11-16mm 2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5573
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Feb 17, 2014 11:17 |  #2

No; I use a CPL on the 24-105 all the time with no problems getting it on/off. It sounds like you might have had the old one cross-threaded, which would make it difficult; but, in general you should be fine.


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bogino
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
586 posts
Gallery: 45 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 374
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Southern California
     
Feb 17, 2014 11:22 |  #3

Snydremark wrote in post #16696203 (external link)
No; I use a CPL on the 24-105 all the time with no problems getting it on/off. It sounds like you might have had the old one cross-threaded, which would make it difficult; but, in general you should be fine.

Thx.--Do you keep it on the lens all the time regardless of the type of picture you're taking or do you use it on an as needed basis?


Canon 7D Mark II; Canon 70-300mm "L"; Canon 100mm Macro; Tamron 24-70mm; Tokina 11-16mm 2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ from ­ PA
Cream of the Crop
11,262 posts
Likes: 1529
Joined May 2003
Location: Southeast Pennsylvania
     
Feb 17, 2014 11:30 |  #4

You are aware that a polarizing filter is two pieces of glass, the outer piece will typically rotate full circle, never being stopped? The inner piece screws into the lens at the filter thread. To remove a stuck filter try using a rubber band around the mounting portion.. Some camera stores also have what is called a filter wrench that can remove most any stuck filter.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ from ­ PA
Cream of the Crop
11,262 posts
Likes: 1529
Joined May 2003
Location: Southeast Pennsylvania
     
Feb 17, 2014 11:36 |  #5

Bogino wrote in post #16696177 (external link)
Is it OK to just keep it on the lens at all times regardless of the subject matter I am shooting?

I would not leave a polarizer on all the time. Depending on its rotated position, some can eat up almost two stops of light. There are also some positions of the sun at which the filter doesn't work effectively. You should learn what they are and remove when needed.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5573
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Feb 17, 2014 11:37 |  #6

Bogino wrote in post #16696213 (external link)
Thx.--Do you keep it on the lens all the time regardless of the type of picture you're taking or do you use it on an as needed basis?

Definitely on an as needed basis. Among it's benefits, one characteristic of a CPL which can be good or bad is that it reduces the available light by 1-2 stops. So, i don't tend to put it on unless I'm looking for a specific effect from it.


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kfreels
Goldmember
Avatar
4,297 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Princeton, IN
     
Feb 17, 2014 13:24 |  #7

Same here. Put it on as needed and no more. Aside from what was mentioned above, you are also putting two more pieces of glass between you and your subject which can soften the image somewhat no matter how expensive the filter is.


I am serious....and don't call me Shirley.
Canon 7D and a bunch of other stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gnome ­ chompski
Goldmember
1,252 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 136
Joined Jun 2013
Location: oakland, ca
     
Feb 17, 2014 13:28 |  #8

Just to add some info, I have been very happy with my Marumi CP's. Very affordable if bought on Amazon. I laughed out loud when my local camera store was trying to sell me a ProMaster CP for like $270. I get that they make money off this type of accessory, but dang...
Anyways, it works great on my 24-105, but its an as needed type of thing, like other prior have stated


Tumblr (external link)
Flickr (external link)
Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kfreels
Goldmember
Avatar
4,297 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Princeton, IN
     
Feb 17, 2014 13:35 |  #9

gnome chompski wrote in post #16696499 (external link)
Just to add some info, I have been very happy with my Marumi CP's. Very affordable if bought on Amazon. I laughed out loud when my local camera store was trying to sell me a ProMaster CP for like $270. I get that they make money off this type of accessory, but dang...
Anyways, it works great on my 24-105, but its an as needed type of thing, like other prior have stated

+1 on the Marumi Super DHG. Great bang for the buck.


I am serious....and don't call me Shirley.
Canon 7D and a bunch of other stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,932 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2276
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Feb 17, 2014 16:00 |  #10

I never overly tighten my filters, and when adjusting the CPLs, I only spin the filter the same direction as when I put the filter on. That eliminates possibility of the filter becoming unscrewed. I never leave any filters attached.


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 1061
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
     
Feb 17, 2014 16:11 |  #11
bannedPermanent ban

These wrenches (external link) can prove useful. I've had to use them a couple of times.

I am one of those who leaves the polariser on all the time. I just compensate with my exposure settings. I find it a pain to be taking it off/on and replacing with the clear filter all the time.


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LV ­ Moose
Moose gets blamed for everything.
Avatar
23,434 posts
Gallery: 223 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 4798
Joined Dec 2008
     
Feb 17, 2014 16:22 |  #12

I only put the CPL on as needed.

Alveric wrote in post #16696898 (external link)
These wrenches (external link) can prove useful. I've had to use them a couple of times.

+1

I've never had a CPL get stuck on a lens, but frequently get them stuck on a step-down ring. These wrenches were the only way I could get them apart.


Moose

Gear... Flickr (external link)...Flickr 2 (external link)...
Macro (external link)...Hummingbirds (external link)
Aircraft (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 1061
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
     
Feb 17, 2014 16:45 |  #13
bannedPermanent ban

LV Moose wrote in post #16696929 (external link)
I've never had a CPL get stuck on a lens, but frequently get them stuck on a step-down ring. These wrenches were the only way I could get them apart.

Ditto. Slim filters are particularly nasty if they get stuck.


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KirkS518
Goldmember
Avatar
3,983 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Central Gulf Coast, Flori-duh
     
Feb 17, 2014 16:52 |  #14

I prefer the rubber bands. Cheap (free), and they take up zero room, and they have multiple uses.


If steroids are illegal for athletes, should PS be illegal for models?
Digital - 50D, 20D IR Conv, 9 Lenses from 8mm to 300mm
Analog - Mamiya RB67 Pro-SD, Canon A-1, Nikon F4S, YashicaMat 124G, Rollei 35S, QL17 GIII, Zeiss Ikon Ikoflex 1st Version, and and entire room full of lenses and other stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Frosticles
Senior Member
Avatar
588 posts
Gallery: 37 photos
Likes: 141
Joined Oct 2012
Location: Sherwood Forest
     
Feb 17, 2014 17:03 as a reply to  @ KirkS518's post |  #15

A poloriser works at its best when at 90 degrees to the sun. Can also work well in damp & rainy conditions. Only use mine when needed.


Kind regards, Kevin
My Fickr - http://www.flickr.com/​photos/28825728@N08/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,931 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Question re.: Polarizing Filter
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2006 guests, 124 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.