needed a new pic for my site so took a self portrait today, these things are hard...
anyway i used a 28mm at f8, i wanted it to look a bit distorted but not too much.
let me know what you think.
Feb 17, 2014 16:03 | #1 needed a new pic for my site so took a self portrait today, these things are hard... Canon 5d mkii | Canon 17-40/4L | Tamron 24-70/2.8 | Canon 85/1.8 | Canon 135/2L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BrickR Cream of the Crop 5,935 posts Likes: 115 Joined Mar 2011 Location: Dallas TX More info | Feb 17, 2014 19:28 | #2 It looks a bit distorted, but not too much My junk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ijohnson Goldmember 1,646 posts Joined Nov 2003 Location: Whiteriver, AZ More info | Feb 17, 2014 19:57 | #3 I love it. Well done. www.trickoflight.net
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GlynT Member 71 posts Joined Nov 2012 More info | Feb 18, 2014 14:12 | #4 Looks good to me.... nicely lit, and the distortion is OK - I quite like wide angle portraits for a bit of a different type on image. GT-Images.net
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 18, 2014 22:26 | #5 I too approve. FYI: "Fitness Freak" is also known as "Amber" outside of POTN.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
samsen Cream of the Crop 7,468 posts Likes: 239 Joined Apr 2006 Location: LA More info | Feb 19, 2014 07:14 | #6 Light is perfect. Weak retaliates,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhotosGuy Cream of the Crop, R.I.P. More info | Feb 19, 2014 09:13 | #7 anyway i used a 28mm at f8, i wanted it to look a bit distorted but not too much. Too much, IMO. But if that floats your boat... FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ijesslongbottom Hatchling 3 posts Joined Feb 2014 Location: Bellingham, WA More info | Feb 20, 2014 00:11 | #8 Love it! The distortion makes it so much more interesting. Northwest Washington Wedding & Portrait Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 20, 2014 06:33 | #9 thanks. sometimes you have to break the rules to get an interesting shot. Canon 5d mkii | Canon 17-40/4L | Tamron 24-70/2.8 | Canon 85/1.8 | Canon 135/2L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 20, 2014 06:34 | #10 btw, photoshop CC 's selection and refine edge is lightyears ahead of cs5. Canon 5d mkii | Canon 17-40/4L | Tamron 24-70/2.8 | Canon 85/1.8 | Canon 135/2L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BigAlz1 Goldmember 1,475 posts Likes: 4 Joined Mar 2009 Location: Somewhere Great! More info | Feb 20, 2014 08:40 | #11 Was it the lens that made that "MA" so big in your watermark? Lol Wow is that distracting, make the whole thing a third the size and shrink that MA to mach the total height of the rest of it and stick it to the left of.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Spike44 Goldmember 2,155 posts Likes: 3 Joined Dec 2007 More info | Feb 20, 2014 10:55 | #12 BigAlz1 wrote in post #16703845 Was it the lens that made that "MA" so big in your watermark? Lol Wow is that distracting, make the whole thing a third the size and shrink that MA to mach the total height of the rest of it and stick it to the left of. I agree....but I have given up on commenting on unnecessarily large logos and/or signatures....and in most cases totally unnecessary and distracting for a shot posted for critique. At least in the above case it is attractive and professional.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BigAlz1 Goldmember 1,475 posts Likes: 4 Joined Mar 2009 Location: Somewhere Great! More info | Feb 20, 2014 13:25 | #13 I did want to add that over all it's good. The hair does fall of a bit dark due to the lighting. And me personally, Just a thought, with a sharp detail portrait try one smoothed shaved or have that full trim every five days look. You're in between and it looks like you just didn't shave in a day or two.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer 1323 guests, 124 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||