Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 18 Feb 2014 (Tuesday) 20:42
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Framing for Prints

 
marcheseg
Member
Avatar
173 posts
Gallery: 78 photos
Likes: 318
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Boston, USA
     
Feb 18, 2014 20:42 |  #1

When you shoot an object, car, person, sports, anything, do you think about the framing for 5x7 or 8x10? By default canon cameras are 2x3 which is 4x6, 8x12 etc.
I can crop to an 8x10 or 5x7 if I have enough room, but sometimes I don't have enough room because I filled the frame in my viewfinder. So how do I know how much space to leave in my viewfinder for cropping in the future? I hope this all makes sense.
Thanks in advance.


CANON 6D | 77D | 50mm 1.8 II | 28mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 USM |15-85 f3.5-5.6 IS USM | 70-300L f4-5.6 IS USM | 24-105L f4 IS USM | 17-40L f4 USM |18-200 f3.5-5.6 IS | 55-250 IS STM | 10-18 f4.5-5.6 IS STM | Flashpoint TTL Zoom Speedlight

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MCAsan
Goldmember
Avatar
3,918 posts
Likes: 88
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Atlanta
     
Feb 18, 2014 20:50 |  #2

Yes we commonly print on A3 paper with a centered 11x14 image. So that means cropping the long side or using resize software. Do the cropping/resize before you spend much time on other adjustments. You may find that you need to rethink the cropping or even the use of the image.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
1Tanker
Goldmember
Avatar
4,470 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Swaying to the Symphony of Destruction
     
Feb 18, 2014 22:54 as a reply to  @ MCAsan's post |  #3

If you think you're going to be printing and framing at 8x10, you can shoot at the 4:3(albeit at minimally-less resolution) format, and have less to crop.


Kel
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
El ­ Pedro
Senior Member
Avatar
708 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 12
Joined Sep 2012
Location: Australia
     
Feb 19, 2014 02:12 |  #4

I print 8x12, it's a **** to find frames though.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jaomul
Goldmember
Avatar
1,236 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 71
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Cork, Ireland
     
Feb 19, 2014 02:51 |  #5

I find it good to frame up a little "loose" for want of a better word. With many 15plus mp cameras now if you ate nit 100% sure ratio of print leave a little to spare


flickr (external link)
Olympus EM5,Nikon d7200,
Olympus 12-50mm, 40-150mm,17mm f2.8,Nikon 50mm F1.8, Tamron 90mm vc, 18-105mmVR, Sigma 18-35 f1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
Feb 19, 2014 03:51 |  #6

I never consider framing while shooting. If the shot is worth it, I print 16 x 12 inch and have a supply of mats to fit 19.5" x 15.5" frames. Cropping to suit from the standard Canon product is never a problem as I would never dream of composing an image that used the full width, it just seems an odd ratio.

The only exception is when I assemble panoramic shots, and these are such odd sizes that I construct special frames, matting them as a one off.


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
marcheseg
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
173 posts
Gallery: 78 photos
Likes: 318
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Boston, USA
     
Feb 19, 2014 06:22 |  #7

Lowner wrote in post #16700860 (external link)
I never consider framing while shooting. If the shot is worth it, I print 16 x 12 inch and have a supply of mats to fit 19.5" x 15.5" frames. Cropping to suit from the standard Canon product is never a problem as I would never dream of composing an image that used the full width, it just seems an odd ratio.

Good thought, I never thought of that, thanks.


CANON 6D | 77D | 50mm 1.8 II | 28mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 USM |15-85 f3.5-5.6 IS USM | 70-300L f4-5.6 IS USM | 24-105L f4 IS USM | 17-40L f4 USM |18-200 f3.5-5.6 IS | 55-250 IS STM | 10-18 f4.5-5.6 IS STM | Flashpoint TTL Zoom Speedlight

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rrblint
Listen! .... do you smell something?
Avatar
23,088 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 2889
Joined May 2012
Location: U.S.A.
     
Feb 19, 2014 07:06 |  #8

Lowner wrote in post #16700860 (external link)
I never consider framing while shooting. If the shot is worth it, I print 16 x 12 inch and have a supply of mats to fit 19.5" x 15.5" frames. Cropping to suit from the standard Canon product is never a problem as I would never dream of composing an image that used the full width, it just seems an odd ratio.

The only exception is when I assemble panoramic shots, and these are such odd sizes that I construct special frames, matting them as a one off.

^^^^+1.

Yes, matting to suit is the key.


Mark

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cicopo
Goldmember
Avatar
3,702 posts
Gallery: 248 photos
Likes: 1389
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Ottawa, Ont, Canada
     
Feb 19, 2014 10:30 |  #9

I try very hard to always frame my shots knowing that they will be cropped in some way for printing. I've even wrote a couple of short articles about this topic. See message 15 here.

http://www.rccanada.ca …hread.php?t=147​971&page=2 (external link)


A skill is developed through constant practice with a passion to improve, not bought.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkbslc
Cream of the Crop
24,604 posts
Likes: 45
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Utah, USA
     
Feb 19, 2014 12:19 |  #10

It's too bad frame companies are still stuck on 5x7 and 8x10 and 11x14 as the standards. Almost nothing outputs in those aspect ratios and really hasn't for 50 years. Those were large format standards we've been stuck on for almost a century.

To answer the question: Since I mainly shoot for myself and close friends/family, I shoot for composition, not potential frame size. If I find it doesn't crop to 5x7 or 8x10 then I find a mat that lets it fit in a larger standard size.. I've also had a few custom frames made and it's not as expensive as you'd think.


Taylor
Galleries: Flickr (external link)
EOS Rp | iPhone 11 Pro Max

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hogloff
Cream of the Crop
7,606 posts
Likes: 416
Joined Apr 2003
Location: British Columbia
     
Feb 19, 2014 16:13 |  #11
bannedPermanent ban

tkbslc wrote in post #16701685 (external link)
It's too bad frame companies are still stuck on 5x7 and 8x10 and 11x14 as the standards. Almost nothing outputs in those aspect ratios and really hasn't for 50 years. Those were large format standards we've been stuck on for almost a century.

To answer the question: Since I mainly shoot for myself and close friends/family, I shoot for composition, not potential frame size. If I find it doesn't crop to 5x7 or 8x10 then I find a mat that lets it fit in a larger standard size.. I've also had a few custom frames made and it's not as expensive as you'd think.

The key is standard frame and custom mattes. Getting custom frames made is very expensive if you use quality frame material.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
zguyach
Member
49 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2014
Location: Pittsburgh
     
Feb 19, 2014 18:26 |  #12

I toyed with making my own frames for a bit and I gave up on it. I'm sure if I had some real training, It is possible to make it worthwhile




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EverydayGetaway
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,008 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 5398
Joined Oct 2012
Location: GA Mountains
     
Feb 20, 2014 01:29 |  #13

I learned this lesson sort of the hard way with my first team portrait session. I always try to frame my shots tightly, but I was offering 8x10 prints for the team portraits... ended up having to leave borders on a couple of the shots. The parents were still very happy with them thankfully, but now I always keep it in mind when doing those types of shots. For my personal stuff though, I just matte if needed.


Fuji X-T3 // Fuji X-Pro2 (Full Spectrum) // Fuji X-H1 // Fuji X-T1
flickr (external link) // Instagram (external link)www.LucasGPhoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Yno
Senior Member
Avatar
910 posts
Likes: 93
Joined Jan 2008
Location: San Jose, California
     
Feb 20, 2014 08:39 |  #14

zguyach wrote in post #16702584 (external link)
I toyed with making my own frames for a bit and I gave up on it. I'm sure if I had some real training, It is possible to make it worthwhile

Logan Graphics sells some nice frame making equipment. If you have the time and the room, it shouldn't be too hard. But I would consider it a labor of love and not so much an issue of money. If you are making them yourself you probably are not into volume, and if you are doing a lot, a frame shop might be a better idea. I do cut my own mats, but the only custom frames I have made have been from pre cut kits, available at a number of vendors online.


I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.
www.imawino.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
zguyach
Member
49 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2014
Location: Pittsburgh
     
Feb 20, 2014 13:16 |  #15

Ah. I really need a proper framing jig to make it worthwhile. Plus a router. Haha.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,467 views & 0 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Framing for Prints
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
873 guests, 145 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.