I am trying to improve my photography and editing. How could I improve these?
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
Feb 23, 2014 19:12 | #1 I am trying to improve my photography and editing. How could I improve these? Image hosted by forum (678011) © mdaddyrabbit [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Image hosted by forum (678012) © mdaddyrabbit [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 23, 2014 19:48 | #2 Great shots!!! I see very little problems here, just her skin tone seems off in #1 and the vignette maybe a little too much. Your off camera flash seems too high of power (or too close to subject) and it is giving that hard shadow. I would have moved it off to either side a little more as well. ---------------
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Two more! Image hosted by forum (678022) © mdaddyrabbit [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Image hosted by forum (678023) © mdaddyrabbit [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | Feb 23, 2014 20:11 | #4 The only issue I have is there should be a bit more of her and less background. You've selected some nice scenes but perhaps got a little too carried away showing them.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
chocolatekara Senior Member 286 posts Likes: 10 Joined Oct 2013 Location: Adelaide, South Australia More info | Feb 23, 2014 21:02 | #5 the tones in #1 and #3 don't do a lot for me, her skin colour is the same the wood, but #4 I think is a great shot, love the shadows and the window! Improvements I would make would be to a crop it a bit more and pull back the yellow tones slightly - she's looking a bit yellow on the face and hair (at least on my monitor!) _______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 23, 2014 21:18 | #6 Thanks, I am really struggling with all aspects of my photography.....the viewing and opinions are greatly appreciated. Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
chocolatekara Senior Member 286 posts Likes: 10 Joined Oct 2013 Location: Adelaide, South Australia More info | Feb 23, 2014 21:37 | #7 You're doing great _______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
OhLook insufferably pedantic. I can live with that. 24,824 posts Gallery: 105 photos Best ofs: 2 Likes: 16162 Joined Dec 2012 Location: California: SF Bay Area More info | Feb 23, 2014 23:05 | #8 In some of these, the model's face looks strangely artificial, like a doll or a mannequin, and I don't think the skin tone is the only reason. I think you sharpened too much. PRONOUN ADVISORY: OhLook is a she. | A FEW CORRECT SPELLINGS: lens, aperture, amateur, hobbyist, per se, raccoon, whoa | Comments welcome
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ldt_81 Member 156 posts Joined Feb 2012 More info | Feb 23, 2014 23:20 | #9 I like the poses, but I think you should crop closer, like others have said. I feel like she gets lost in the scene. They also feel a little dark to me, I almost want to see some sunlight framing her, something to draw you into the photo a little more. I'm Lora
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 24, 2014 08:24 | #10 The first two look really good to me, maybe just crop a little closer. Instagram
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Titus213 Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 25, 2014 19:53 | #11 gonzogolf wrote in post #16712136 The only issue I have is there should be a bit more of her and less background. You've selected some nice scenes but perhaps got a little too carried away showing them. Agree - but nice work for sure. Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 25, 2014 20:02 | #12 Permanent banIs that your flash reflected in the window? If so, that's a technical mistake, unless it's intentional, in which case it's just odd. 'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 25, 2014 20:06 | #13 Alveric wrote in post #16717691 Is that your flash reflected in the window? If so, that's a technical mistake, unless it's intentional, in which case it's just odd. Sad but I didn't see that.......I think maybe my eye thought it was a parking lot light since I was on second floor. Don't know how I missed that. Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 25, 2014 20:09 | #14 Permanent banIt happens. But we always have to watch out for it, because it's not always easy to remove it in post. 'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Monkeytoes 1522 guests, 190 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||