jdizzle THREAD STARTER Darth Noink  69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Feb 25, 2014 11:45 | #16 jwcdds wrote in post #16716398  I wonder if that's 200-continuous RAW files or is that still jpg limited? Sounds like a great camera, though I was expecting something a little more. It's definitely not a big leap but, I'd like to see for myself. The D3 and D3s I've used didn't show much of a big gain in ISO. And the D4 was slightly ahead.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mclaren777 Goldmember  1,482 posts Likes: 86 Joined May 2012 Location: Olympia, WA More info | Feb 25, 2014 12:27 | #17 FarmerTed1971 wrote in post #16716280 16.4MP? Why would anyone release a camera with less that 20 now? Weird.... I can't tell if you're being serious. A simple comparison of sensor technology: Nikon vs. Canon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle THREAD STARTER Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Feb 25, 2014 17:06 | #18 I don't think he understands at all. He reads specs and thinks the 1D X is better. In reality when it comes to IQ, both the D4 and 1D X are similar.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BrainMechanic Goldmember  3,526 posts Likes: 18 Joined Apr 2010 More info | Feb 25, 2014 17:14 | #19  Permanent banjdizzle wrote in post #16717271 I don't think he understands at all. He reads specs and thinks the 1D X is better. In reality when it comes to IQ, both the D4 and 1D X are similar.  Agree. Shame how still some people put so much importance in MP....specially in a photography related board. Gear: a toothed wheel
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DavidArbogast Cream of the Crop  More info | Feb 25, 2014 17:22 | #20 Brain Mechanic wrote in post #16717284 Agree. Shame how still some people put so much importance in MP....specially in a photography related board. MP is essential for some kinds of photography and not for others. The kind of photography that the D4s is best suited for is fine @ 16MP. Those that need more have the D800. David | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
boerewors Goldmember  1,948 posts Likes: 4 Joined Sep 2009 Location: South African living in Indonesia More info | Feb 25, 2014 19:41 | #21 it shows an impressive battery life, but i dont see much else. incrimental update as others have said The most important piece of gear you own, resides in your head and its called your brain.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
panicatnabisco Senior Member  More info | Feb 25, 2014 20:19 | #22 Looks like they got rid of the green cast too, I might consider going back to Nikon Canon 1DX III | 1DX | 6D II | 6D | 16-35/2.8 II | 24-70/2.8 II | 35/1.4 II | 50/1.8 | 70-200/2.8 IS II | 85/1.4 IS | 100/2.8 IS macro | 200mm f/2 | 400/2.8 IS II | 2xIII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle THREAD STARTER Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Feb 26, 2014 05:57 | #23 boerewors wrote in post #16717624 it shows an impressive battery life, but i dont see much else. incrimental update as others have said I'm looking forward to DXO's assessment on sensor performace for high ISO. I'm guessing it might not be a huge leap but incremental at best.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle THREAD STARTER Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Feb 26, 2014 06:00 | #24 panicatnabisco wrote in post #16717735 Looks like they got rid of the green cast too, I might consider going back to Nikon  I'm going to have a hard time choosing between the 1Dx and D4sDo it! I've already put my preorder in.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 26, 2014 08:34 | #25 jdizzle wrote in post #16718572 I'm looking forward to DXO's assessment on sensor performace for high ISO. I'm guessing it might not be a huge leap but incremental at best. I saw a high ISO comparison of the 4S and 4 yesterday, it's quite an improvement. Easily noticeable.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jwcdds Cream of the Crop  More info | Feb 26, 2014 08:57 | #26 rick_reno wrote in post #16718825 I saw a high ISO comparison of the 4S and 4 yesterday, it's quite an improvement. Easily noticeable. Found it... http://www.clubsnap.com …/showthread.php?t=1375310 It's not like Canon's slight-of-hand trick with better jpg-conversion algorithms while RAW remains relatively the same, is it? Julian
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle THREAD STARTER Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Feb 26, 2014 13:28 | #27 rick_reno wrote in post #16718825 I saw a high ISO comparison of the 4S and 4 yesterday, it's quite an improvement. Easily noticeable. Found it... http://www.clubsnap.com …/showthread.php?t=1375310 Thanks for the link, Rick. I'm gonna check these samples when I get home.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
panicatnabisco Senior Member More info | Feb 26, 2014 14:11 | #28 rick_reno wrote in post #16718825 I saw a high ISO comparison of the 4S and 4 yesterday, it's quite an improvement. Easily noticeable. Found it... http://www.clubsnap.com …/showthread.php?t=1375310 Wow, they really did got rid of the D4's "lets put random green spots everywhere" rendering on higher ISOs. Just seeing how clean they look is just amazing. This could be a huge game changer My wallet has issues with me and I think you're causing it Canon 1DX III | 1DX | 6D II | 6D | 16-35/2.8 II | 24-70/2.8 II | 35/1.4 II | 50/1.8 | 70-200/2.8 IS II | 85/1.4 IS | 100/2.8 IS macro | 200mm f/2 | 400/2.8 IS II | 2xIII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MuahMan Senior Member 288 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jun 2008 More info | Feb 26, 2014 16:14 | #29 409,600k ISO. That's been around forever. Every shot of Bigfoot/Sasquatch has been shot at 409k ISO. Bodies: Sony A7, Canon 6D,Canon G15/ Glass Zeiss 16-35, Zeiss 135, Zeiss FE 55 1.8, FE 35 2.8, FE 24-70 F4 OSS,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jrafael Member 134 posts Joined Jul 2012 Location: London, UK More info | Feb 26, 2014 21:48 | #30 "I would, but you see, the way I got my bank account set up, I got a checkings and a savings, but all my money is in my savings, so I gotta switch it to my checkings, but it's gonna take 3 business days...I don't think it's gonna go through." ~Kevin Hart.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1565 guests, 138 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
