Be aware that studio flashes are all over the place in terms of efficiency of conversion of electricity to light. Reasons for this include:
- Reflector light distribution in degrees of angle spread of light (e.g. 90 degree vs. 140 degree)
- Reflector surface efficiency, (e.g. shiny chrome vs. matte metal vs. white painted)
- Simple losses due to cable lengths between electric supply and flash tube
Decades ago, softbox manufacturer Chimera published a catalog showing measured (meter) light output from many different brands of '1000 watt-second' studio flash units used in the Chimera softbox. This was a good comparison because the softbox neutralized differences in reflector spread and efficiency of light distribution. In the published results, Brand X might be -1EV less light than Brand A and -0.4EV less than Brand B, for example...ALL of them with '1000 watt-seconds' So if you compared the Canon 580EX to one of them, WHICH one do you equate it to, which 'standard of comparison'?! That is why comparisons are relatively meaningless unless you state which two units are being compared -- the standard of reference becomes some fixed result, not variable (depending upon brand/model chosen) results.
Unfortunately, Chimera no longer publishes this catalog...I am sure Brand X complained to them after seeing their unit publicly proclaimed the weakest light output of the bunch!
