Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 27 Feb 2014 (Thursday) 14:44
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

85L Down The Aisle

 
draculr
Member
133 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2010
     
Feb 27, 2014 14:44 |  #1

I'm just wondering if anyone else uses the 85L to capture the down the aisle shots? I feel the reward is great for capturing a shot with that lens (even stopped down a bit) but it's definitely a challenge and potentially risky. The 5D3 makes it a hell of a lot easier however!

Curious to hear peoples opinions!

Example: 85L @ 1.2 on a 6D taken by me a while ago as a second shooter:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/plain' | Byte size: ZERO

Photography by Peter Georges (external link) - Sydney Wedding and Portrait Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nathancarter
Cream of the Crop
5,474 posts
Gallery: 32 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 609
Joined Dec 2010
     
Feb 27, 2014 14:56 |  #2

I don't own one, though I've used a friend's just a little bit.

Isn't it relatively slow to focus?


http://www.avidchick.c​om (external link) for business stuff
http://www.facebook.co​m/VictorVoyeur (external link) for fun stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
draculr
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
133 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2010
     
Feb 27, 2014 15:24 |  #3

nathancarter wrote in post #16722291 (external link)
I don't own one, though I've used a friend's just a little bit.

Isn't it relatively slow to focus?

Yep, that's where the challenge is. I don't think many people use them for action type scenarios but I'm wondering if any other wedding photographers do now that we have bodies which can make it work.


Photography by Peter Georges (external link) - Sydney Wedding and Portrait Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
umphotography
grabbing their Johnson
Avatar
12,321 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 4203
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Rathdrum, Idaho
     
Feb 27, 2014 18:27 as a reply to  @ draculr's post |  #4

I wouldnt be caught dead with an 85L on the camera for a processional.....No Thanks. An 85 1.8 Maybe. But I prefer to use a zoom so i can grab 4-5 perspectives while they are walking in.


Mike
www.umphotography.com (external link)
GEAR LIST
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Christopher ­ Steven ­ b
Goldmember
Avatar
3,547 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Ottawa, Canada
     
Feb 27, 2014 19:35 |  #5

Even on a full-frame, I would find that far too long. I want shots at the entrance end of the aisle, but also at the front, where I generally move slightly around the corner to get the moment the bride is handed off. If I'm shooting that long I'll miss these shots and the intimacy of that moment. I'm generally using a 50mm, which I find is a decent compromise.



christopher steven b. - Ottawa Wedding Photographer

www.christopherstevenb​.com (external link)| Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
memoriesoftomorrow
Goldmember
3,846 posts
Likes: 293
Joined Nov 2010
     
Feb 27, 2014 20:20 |  #6

Just one of the reasons I ditched the 85L for the Sigma 85 1.4. Why create a difficulty when I don't need to have one? Why risk missing a shot because a lens focuses slower than man took to evolve from apes (I had a love / hate relationship with my 85L).

I shoot people coming down the aisle on the 70-200 and 16-35... But I also have a 50 and a 36 (equivalent) on my A7s too. Sometimes I'll use the Sigma 85, the 50L or the 24L and even the 70-200 with the 1.4x extender. It really depends on the venue as to what I choose to use.


Peter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Thomas ­ Campbell
Goldmember
Avatar
2,105 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Kingwood, TX
     
Feb 27, 2014 22:57 |  #7

I always used the 85L for processionals when I primarily shot Canon. The 85L is slow to focus, but once you locked on, it was fine at following focus.

You can get different perspectives when they are at different positions down the aisle. :)


Houston Wedding Photographer (external link)
Houston Sports Photographer (external link)
Current Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Peacefield
Goldmember
Avatar
4,023 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2008
Location: NJ
     
Feb 28, 2014 06:47 |  #8

I love this lens for portraits but would never use it for something like the processional. As already noted, it's too slow to focus. But I also want to take a series of each person coming down the aisle; 3-4 of them if I can. So my preference is the 24-70 II on a crop body. This gives me focal lengths of ~35-105,

For the most part, these are documentary photos and I want to make sure I hit focus and I have the flexibility to shoot as often and when I need so definitely a zoom for me.


Robert Wayne Photography (external link)

5D3, 5D2, 50D, 350D * 16-35 2.8 II, 24-70 2.8 II, 70-200 2.8 IS II, 100-400 IS, 100 L Macro, 35 1.4, 85 1.2 II, 135 2.0, Tokina 10-17 fish * 580 EX II (3) Stratos triggers * Other Stuff plus a Pelican 1624 to haul it all

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
draculr
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
133 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2010
     
Feb 28, 2014 08:50 |  #9

Peacefield wrote in post #16723696 (external link)
I love this lens for portraits but would never use it for something like the processional. As already noted, it's too slow to focus. But I also want to take a series of each person coming down the aisle; 3-4 of them if I can. So my preference is the 24-70 II on a crop body. This gives me focal lengths of ~35-105,

For the most part, these are documentary photos and I want to make sure I hit focus and I have the flexibility to shoot as often and when I need so definitely a zoom for me.

I'd always have a 35mm on my other 5d3 for those shots. Would never do anything with JUST the 85mm 1.2 on.


Photography by Peter Georges (external link) - Sydney Wedding and Portrait Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Thomas ­ Campbell
Goldmember
Avatar
2,105 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Kingwood, TX
     
Feb 28, 2014 09:15 |  #10

As already noted, it's too slow to focus.

Simply not true. It is slow to get initial focus, but once it has focus, it does a fine job of tracking. Use Servo mode for something moving like the processional.

I shot dozens of weddings with it. It does work.


Houston Wedding Photographer (external link)
Houston Sports Photographer (external link)
Current Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nathancarter
Cream of the Crop
5,474 posts
Gallery: 32 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 609
Joined Dec 2010
     
Feb 28, 2014 09:18 |  #11

From the product description at B&H:

Fast and Quiet AF
The ring-type USM uses ultrasonic frequency vibrations to drive extremely rapid autofocus with near-silent operation. A high-speed CPU and optimized AF algorithms contribute further to AF speed. Full time electronic manual focus override is available without having to switch out of AF.

I don't know what you're all on about ;)


http://www.avidchick.c​om (external link) for business stuff
http://www.facebook.co​m/VictorVoyeur (external link) for fun stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nicksan
Man I Like to Fart
Avatar
24,738 posts
Likes: 53
Joined Oct 2006
Location: NYC
     
Feb 28, 2014 10:36 as a reply to  @ nathancarter's post |  #12

Though I don't use my 85L for processionals, if the lens doesn't have to do a full rack then it's fine. I just prefer to use a 70-200 on one camera and a short prime on another.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
umphotography
grabbing their Johnson
Avatar
12,321 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 4203
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Rathdrum, Idaho
     
Feb 28, 2014 10:42 |  #13

Thomas Campbell wrote in post #16723952 (external link)
Simply not true. It is slow to get initial focus, but once it has focus, it does a fine job of tracking. Use Servo mode for something moving like the processional.

I shot dozens of weddings with it. It does work.

I agree with this. I use it on the dance floor when ever possible. problem is, like Nick Mentioned, if you miss and it has to do a full rack, your screwed on a processional. I love the 24-70 2 F/3.5. It does a great job. I can click off horizontal and portrait mode shots all the way down. So 5-8 perspectives easily.


Mike
www.umphotography.com (external link)
GEAR LIST
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
igora90
Senior Member
923 posts
Likes: 82
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Rovaniemi, Finland
     
Feb 28, 2014 11:32 |  #14

Thomas Campbell wrote in post #16723952 (external link)
Simply not true. It is slow to get initial focus, but once it has focus, it does a fine job of tracking. Use Servo mode for something moving like the processional.

I shot dozens of weddings with it. It does work.

+1

This is not a wedding photo but 3 shots out of 5 were perfectly focused and those 2 missed ones were the first shots.

IMAGE: https://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7318/10255130086_382a919f33_c.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …rorautiainen/10​255130086/  (external link)
_MG_5766-Edit (external link) by Iiro Rautiainen (external link), on Flickr

2x Canon 6D, Sigma 35mm f/1.4, Sigma 50mm f/1.4 ART, EF 85mm f/1.8, EF 135 F/2.0
www.iirorautiainen.com (external link)
Flickr (external link)
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jmikolich
Senior Member
Avatar
388 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Ohio
     
Feb 28, 2014 11:41 |  #15

umphotography wrote in post #16724168 (external link)
I agree with this. I use it on the dance floor when ever possible. problem is, like Nick Mentioned, if you miss and it has to do a full rack, your screwed on a processional. I love the 24-70 2 F/3.5. It does a great job. I can click off horizontal and portrait mode shots all the way down. So 5-8 perspectives easily.

Are you saying you shoot the 24-70 mk2 @ f3.5 for processional?

I typically use that option too, +/- a bit, or the 70-200 depending on the venue.. I'd love to try the 85L in a wedding, just don't have the cash to buy it... or the cajones to try and use it given the razor thinness @ 85mm f1.2

I'd also like to use one to try some freelensing since I've heard the rear element is the right shape.


-Jim
Canon 5D3,5D3,5D2,6D,24 f2.8 IS,35L,45 TS-E,50L,85 f1.8,70-200 f2.8L II,100L
Rokinon 14mm f2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,362 views & 0 likes for this thread, 18 members have posted to it.
85L Down The Aisle
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
1095 guests, 169 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.