I think it looks much better now, still not a big fan of the reply box, but it's ok.

Jan 20, 2015 17:33 | #6946 I think it looks much better now, still not a big fan of the reply box, but it's ok. Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Puckman Cream of the Crop More info | Jan 20, 2015 20:18 | #6947 New format is much easier on the eyes on mobile platforms (iPad). Sony A7RII and a bunch of lenses.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 21, 2015 10:04 | #6948 ^ I'll let you know if I ever sell it, Dean... Anyhoo... Another one from moi... Griffith Park Observatory with downtown Los Angeles' skyline as the backdrop... 1Ds3 + 135L + Lee 0.6 ND and 0.6 Soft Edge GND Filter (stacked)... ISO 100, f/2 @ 1/1600sec... ![]() Hi. My name is Butch...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 21, 2015 10:24 | #6949 Oh wow, that's an awesome one. Perfect composition for telephoto compression.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 21, 2015 10:48 | #6950 definitely a great vantage point, how is the hike? Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 21, 2015 10:55 | #6951 koala yummies wrote in post #17392998 Oh wow, that's an awesome one. Perfect composition for telephoto compression. Charlie wrote in post #17393032 definitely a great vantage point, how is the hike? Thx Gents... Next time I'll shoot it with the 200 1.8L (wide open) for added telephoto compression on the image... Hehehe.. And Charlie... The hike isn't bad... However... If you have 10+ pounds of gear attached to you, then it can get a little bit difficult... But we are all strong and young lads that can take it, right?! RIGHT!!! Hi. My name is Butch...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rezcar Goldmember More info | Jan 21, 2015 11:17 | #6952 Another great shot Butch, definitely on my list. Hopefully can go this weekend. But I think I'll take the elevator, lol. Fotostream
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lovemyram4x4 Goldmember More info | Jan 21, 2015 12:27 | #6953 airbutchie wrote in post #17393045 Thx Gents... Next time I'll shoot it with the 200 1.8L (wide open) for added telephoto compression on the image... Hehehe.. And Charlie... The hike isn't bad... However... If you have 10+ pounds of gear attached to you, then it can get a little bit difficult... But we are all strong and young lads that can take it, right?! RIGHT!!! ![]() That's scene is screaming for a TS-E 90.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 21, 2015 12:52 | #6954 lovemyram4x4 wrote in post #17393187 That's scene is screaming for a TS-E 90. I've been considering adding a TS-E to my inventory... More on the wide end, though; 17 or the 24 models... Hmmmm... Hi. My name is Butch...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Puckman Cream of the Crop More info | Jan 21, 2015 13:03 | #6955 Griffith this weekend! For sure! Sony A7RII and a bunch of lenses.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lovemyram4x4 Goldmember More info | Jan 21, 2015 13:09 | #6956 I love my 24. If I had the money I'd get all of them but will likely only add the 90(I can get close enough 45 with TCs on the 24) but I'd prefer to wait and see if they up date the 45 and 90 to have independent rotation he like the 17 and 24 II. The 17 would be nice for the times I'd like wider than 24 and stitching isn't an option but then I'd need to get bigger filters which I'd prefer not to for both price and transporting.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rent Senior Member 651 posts Likes: 39 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Irvine, CA More info | Jan 21, 2015 17:37 | #6957 I'd pick the 17 between the 17 and 24 if I must choose, since the 17 can be used with the 1.4x to get you to 24mm. I actually have both and love them equally. lovemyram4x4 wrote in post #17393252 I love my 24. If I had the money I'd get all of them but will likely only add the 90(I can get close enough 45 with TCs on the 24) but I'd prefer to wait and see if they up date the 45 and 90 to have independent rotation he like the 17 and 24 II. The 17 would be nice for the times I'd like wider than 24 and stitching isn't an option but then I'd need to get bigger filters which I'd prefer not to for both price and transporting. http://portfolio.alexjiang.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lovemyram4x4 Goldmember More info | Jan 21, 2015 17:53 | #6958 rent wrote in post #17393637 I'd pick the 17 between the 17 and 24 if I must choose, since the 17 can be used with the 1.4x to get you to 24mm. I actually have both and love them equally. ![]() I was originally going to go that route for the same reason, but with my current filters not working and the fact that I tend to shoot more in the 24mm range for the types of shots I'd use either of them. Since it's usually unlikely I'd be using them for action stitching is fine if needed, plus gives me an even more pixels to print large if desired.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Puckman Cream of the Crop More info | Jan 21, 2015 19:13 | #6959 One of these days, I'll get the TS-17 or 24. Image hosted by forum (709021) © Puckman [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Sony A7RII and a bunch of lenses.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 21, 2015 19:19 | #6960 nice processing. Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2177 guests, 135 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||