Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 02 Mar 2014 (Sunday) 06:23
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

New to SLR/DSLR

 
archer1960
Goldmember
Avatar
4,932 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 82
Joined Jul 2010
     
Mar 02, 2014 10:54 |  #16

kevitt_1973 wrote in post #16728515 (external link)
Thanks. Im looking at a 50 mm now. My camera came with a EF 70mm-300mm, which I found out is great and I was willing to trade for a 50 mm, but I see I would be losing. Im just use to the point and shoot and the 70mm-300mm isn't close to that...LOL I'm learning as I go. Thanks a bunch

Definitely keep the 70-300, and maybe supplement with a shorter zoom like an 18-55 and a flash. If your shortest lens is only 70mm, you're going to find that you can't get far enough away for many of the shots you'll want, especially indoors (like at your daughter's prom).


Gripped 7D, gripped, full-spectrum modfied T1i (500D), SX50HS, A2E film body, Tamzooka (150-600), Tamron 90mm/2.8 VC (ver 2), Tamron 18-270 VC, Canon FD 100 f/4.0 macro, Canon 24-105 f/4L,Canon EF 200 f/2.8LII, Canon 85 f/1.8, Tamron Adaptall 2 90mmf/2.5 Macro, Tokina 11-16, Canon EX-430 flash, Vivitar DF-383 flash, Astro-Tech AT6RC and Celestron NexStar 102 GT telescopes, various other semi-crappy manual lenses and stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
binlu12
Senior Member
Avatar
285 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jan 2013
     
Mar 02, 2014 11:03 |  #17

archer1960 wrote in post #16728725 (external link)
Definitely keep the 70-300, and maybe supplement with a shorter zoom like an 18-55 and a flash. If your shortest lens is only 70mm, you're going to find that you can't get far enough away for many of the shots you'll want, especially indoors (like at your daughter's/ prom).

Is it a 75-300 or 70-300? Not worth to keep 75-300 and it is about the right trade with a 50/1.8.


6D, 7DII, 1DII, 24-105mm f/4L IS USM, 70-200mm F/4L IS USM, 15-85 IS USM, Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art, 600EX-RT
Feedback #3
Feedback #2
Feedback #1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DC ­ Fan
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,881 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 53
Joined Oct 2005
     
Mar 02, 2014 11:16 |  #18

kevitt_1973 wrote in post #16728244 (external link)
Ive always had a point and shoot camera, but recently purchased a Canon T2i DSLR camera and still very new with SLR/DSLR so I was wondering for a beginner how cheap can I get my lens and what are the older lens called so I can look for those type for the price? Ive seen online FD lenses, Ef lenses, and Ef-s lenses and was wondering, if I needed a adapter to use older lens. My daughters prom is coming soon and would like to be ready for pictures with my dslr camera

The least expensive useful lens for a beginner is the non-stabilized 18-200mm Tamron. (external link) This lens will not offer the performance or technical perfection that many users of this forum demand, but it is a good unit for those who are making the transition from compact cameras and for those who are learning the potential and limits of a DSLR. The lens has a low price, so in case you later decide you don't like the world of DSLR photography you will have made a minimum investment. And, if you grow into hobby photography, you will be able to easily identify where you need new equipment.


Again, and this is an important again, this recommendation is not aimed at the experienced technical perfectionist. It's intended for a beginner, for someone who is just getting started. Others will recommend more elaborate and more expensive lenses, but they will not help you buy what they want you to own.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3433
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Mar 02, 2014 11:22 |  #19

did all you get with your t2i is the 70-300mm?

if so i'd pair along an 18-55STM...add a cheap 50mm f1.8, and if you can swing a yongnuo flash with e-ttl you'll be able to accomplish quite a bit

oh, and skip FD lenses...just look for ef, or ef-s


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kevitt_1973
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
11 posts
Joined Mar 2014
     
Mar 02, 2014 11:43 |  #20

binlu12 wrote in post #16728746 (external link)
Is it a 75-300 or 70-300? Not worth to keep 75-300 and it is about the right trade with a 50/1.8.

Yes, it is a EF 70-300 mm, just rechecked. Its the only lense I have, that came with the camera. Thanks for the advice




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kevitt_1973
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
11 posts
Joined Mar 2014
     
Mar 02, 2014 11:45 |  #21

archer1960 wrote in post #16728725 (external link)
Definitely keep the 70-300, and maybe supplement with a shorter zoom like an 18-55 and a flash. If your shortest lens is only 70mm, you're going to find that you can't get far enough away for many of the shots you'll want, especially indoors (like at your daughter's prom).

Thanks, all help appreciated




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Awaiting the title ferry...
Avatar
19,786 posts
Gallery: 157 photos
Likes: 16886
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Canada
     
Mar 02, 2014 11:46 |  #22

gasrocks wrote in post #16728289 (external link)
Most poeple start with the Canon 18-55 IS and 55-250 IS lenses. They do not cost a lot, fairly sharp and pratical.

I was doing some research for a person and there is a special on T5i and those two lenses. The 55-250 is surprisingly good for the price. If you decide on these mark sure to buy the ones that are STM. Better IQ and quicker focus. A bit more but well worth it as I was told by others.


Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ceegee
Goldmember
2,335 posts
Likes: 35
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Montreal, Quebec
     
Mar 02, 2014 13:53 |  #23

kevitt_1973 wrote in post #16728834 (external link)
Yes, it is a EF 70-300 mm, just rechecked. Its the only lense I have, that came with the camera. Thanks for the advice

In that case you need something in the 17/18 to 50/75 range. The most economical solution is the 18-55 IS, which you can find for around $100. That will give you a nice two-lens setup that is excellent to start with. Use both lenses for a few months, to see if you think you need anything else. You don't need to spend any more money until you know exactly what you want and why you want it.

Enjoy!


Gear: Canon R10, Canon RFS 18-150, Canon RF 100-400

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kevitt_1973
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
11 posts
Joined Mar 2014
     
Mar 02, 2014 15:00 |  #24

digital paradise wrote in post #16728843 (external link)
I was doing some research for a person and there is a special on T5i and those two lenses. The 55-250 is surprisingly good for the price. If you decide on these mark sure to buy the ones that are STM. Better IQ and quicker focus. A bit more but well worth it as I was told by others.

Thank you, I will keep that in mind




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PH68
Senior Member
Avatar
615 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 61
Joined Jun 2013
Location: England
     
Mar 02, 2014 15:38 |  #25

If all you've used is a P&S you may well be shocked by the sheer bulk and weight of even a small DSLR with a typical day-to-day zoom lens attached.

My old film SLR with a 50mm lens was far less bulky and lighter than any modern day DSLR with a 50mm lens.

Expect your DSLR camera and lens to be something in the region of a kilogram, maybe more if you want a few lenses.
It's not the sort of thing you can just shove in your pocket either.

If you're not prepared to carry it around every day then don't buy it, stick to a decent P&S.

If you want an all-in-one camera then consider a bridge camera. They are bulky, but no where near as much as a DSLR with lens, and the weight is a lot less than a DSLR/lens too.

Don't think a DSLR will give you "better" pictures either.
You have to work at it, and understand far more about aperture/shutter/etc..
Any decent photographer will get good pictures with camera built in to a basic mobile phone.

Just some thoughts that haven't been mentioned.


5Diii | 35/2 | 100/2.8L | 300/4L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ksjp2008
Senior Member
269 posts
Joined Sep 2012
     
Mar 02, 2014 15:47 |  #26

which 50 are you looking at?


Canon 7D Gripped : Canon 50mm f 1.4 : Tamron 28-300 3.5-6.3 macro : Tamron 200-500 f/5-6.3 Di LD IF : Canon 70-200 f4 L : Sigma 10-20 F4: Canon 100-400 IS L : Sigma 30 prime: Sigma 24-70 ALL STOLEN !!New Gear so Far: 60D Gripped: Canon 18-135; Canon 70-200 F/4 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
neacail
Goldmember
Avatar
1,188 posts
Gallery: 43 photos
Likes: 441
Joined Dec 2013
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
     
Mar 02, 2014 16:10 |  #27

kevitt_1973 wrote in post #16728515 (external link)
Thanks. Im looking at a 50 mm now. My camera came with a EF 70mm-300mm, which I found out is great and I was willing to trade for a 50 mm, but I see I would be losing. Im just use to the point and shoot and the 70mm-300mm isn't close to that...LOL I'm learning as I go. Thanks a bunch

I think the 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM is a great budget lens. It is a bit soft at 300, so don't zoom out all of the way. It is a challenge to focus manually. My 70-300 comes with me when I'm looking for a light telephoto zoom.


Shelley
Image Editing Okay

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Chris ­ L ­ F
Senior Member
578 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Likes: 3329
Joined Jan 2013
Location: Warwick, England
     
Mar 02, 2014 16:35 |  #28

I'm recent to DSLR having bought one about 12 months ago.

I went with the Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM initially and found it a great lens to keep on the camera. It is not too bulky, can produce good quality and is of a range that covers a lot of situations and is therefore very versatile.

I've since added wider and longer lenses but this is the one I leave on my camera.

I agree on the comment with respect to diminishing returns but also believe strongly in that you need to spend a certain amount (on whatever you are buying) to get something of decent quality.


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/hinkleigh/ (external link)
80D & 90D plus other Canon cameras, lenses, flashgun and printer.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kevitt_1973
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
11 posts
Joined Mar 2014
     
Mar 02, 2014 16:39 |  #29

Chris L F wrote in post #16729473 (external link)
I'm recent to DSLR having bought one about 12 months ago.

I went with the Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM initially and found it a great lens to keep on the camera. It is not too bulky, can produce good quality and is of a range that covers a lot of situations and is therefore very versatile.

I've since added wider and longer lenses but this is the one I leave on my camera.

I agree on the comment with respect to diminishing returns but also believe strongly in that you need to spend a certain amount (on whatever you are buying) to get something of decent quality.

Thanks Chris, you and everyone has helped.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bumpintheroad
Self-inflicted bait
Avatar
1,692 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 352
Joined Oct 2013
Location: NJ, USA
     
Mar 02, 2014 17:22 |  #30

kevitt_1973 wrote in post #16728244 (external link)
Ive always had a point and shoot camera, but recently purchased a Canon T2i DSLR camera and still very new with SLR/DSLR so I was wondering for a beginner how cheap can I get my lens and what are the older lens called so I can look for those type for the price? Ive seen online FD lenses, Ef lenses, and Ef-s lenses and was wondering, if I needed a adapter to use older lens. My daughters prom is coming soon and would like to be ready for pictures with my dslr camera

Based on the above and your later post about owning the very nice Canon 70-300mm, my recommendations are:

  • Canon 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 STM (~$325 used)
  • Yongnuo YN-565 Flash (~$105 new)
  • Lumiquest Ultrasoft or Pocket Bounce Flash Modifier ($25 new)


The 18-135 fills your missing wide, normal and short-telephoto range under the 70-300. It also provides enough overlap that you shouldn't need to switch to or even carry the 70-300 to your daughter's Prom. In fact, 18-135 by itself will cover the majority of situations where your point-and-shoot would have been used.

The flash and modifier are necessary, IMO, because the Prom venue will likely be too dimly-lit for good existing light photography, and your on-camera flash will cause harsh shadows and red-eye, assuming it can even reach the intended subjects. The flash by itself will probably not be sufficient because the venue will likely have high and off-white or even black ceilings, making bounce flash unworkable.

I might even go so far as to suggest an inexpensive/used flip-flash bracket and third-party copy of the Canon Off-Camera Flash cord, so you can rotate the flash to be centered above the lens in both portrait and landscape orientation. Used CB and Stroboframe flip brackets, and other clones, sell for $25-30 on eBay, and a clone OCF cable runs $15-30.

-- Mark | Gear | Flickr (external link) | Picasa (external link) | Youtube (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Image editing is okay

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,930 views & 0 likes for this thread, 22 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
New to SLR/DSLR
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2168 guests, 127 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.