Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 04 Mar 2014 (Tuesday) 17:55
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

i think i may have made a mistake....

 
milleniumking
Senior Member
Avatar
339 posts
Joined Jan 2013
Location: Mississauga Ontario Canada
     
Mar 04, 2014 17:55 |  #1

Hi all...

So i went ahead and sold my 70-200 2.8 non is and grabbed a 70-200 2.8 is vi. Mainly for the IS part. However I feel I got better quality pics with the non IS version. I am a bit disappointed with my new purchase. Has anyone had this dilemma???




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Virto
Goldmember
Avatar
1,647 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Elgin, IL
     
Mar 04, 2014 18:01 |  #2

Which version of the 2.8? The IS mk2 version is AMAZING, but that doesn't mean there can't be an issue with the lens itself.

The 2.8 Mk1 IS is a decent lens, but the 70-200 F4 IS is optically better. The Mk2 2.8 IS is the best of the set.


Kelly - EOS 5D - EOS 40D - Rebel XS - EOS 10D - EOS 1D - SX230 - AE-1 - OM-1n - Minolta Himatic7 - EOS-1N
ABR800 - Several flashes, remote triggers, stands, too many and yet not enough lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
milleniumking
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
339 posts
Joined Jan 2013
Location: Mississauga Ontario Canada
     
Mar 04, 2014 18:10 |  #3

It was the mark i 2.8




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kin2son
Goldmember
4,546 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Mar 04, 2014 18:12 |  #4
bannedPermanent ban

Need to do your research better.....

It's a well known and documented fact that the non IS is sharper than IS ver I......


5D3 Gripped / 17-40L / Σ35 / 40 Pancake / Zeiss 50 MP / Σ85 / 100L Macro / 70-200 f2.8L II IS / 430 EX II / 580 EX II / Canon 2xIII TC / Kenko Ext. Tubes
EOS M / EF-M 18-55 / EF-M 22f2 / Ricoh GR aka Ultimate street camera :p
Flickr (external link) | My Images on Getty®‎ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Avatar
11,091 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 2795
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Mar 04, 2014 18:14 |  #5

kin2son wrote in post #16734746 (external link)
Need to do your research better.....

It's a well known and documented fact that the non IS is sharper than IS ver I......

This.


A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
My Gear Archive

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
milleniumking
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
339 posts
Joined Jan 2013
Location: Mississauga Ontario Canada
     
Mar 04, 2014 18:15 |  #6

So i guess the people on here should not be trusted.... :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike325
Senior Member
Avatar
366 posts
Likes: 33
Joined Apr 2011
Location: MA
     
Mar 04, 2014 18:15 |  #7

Does turning is off help?


Flickr (external link)
panicatnabisco: Sometimes money can buy happiness. Example; camera gear.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhilipJohnBasile
Senior Member
391 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Mar 2006
     
Mar 04, 2014 18:27 as a reply to  @ mike325's post |  #8

Rubbing it twice before hitting the shutter button helps. It aligns the defractorial angle better. :P


Canon 6D
Canon 580ex Speedlight
Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC, Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS EF USM AF, Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM, Canon 50mm 1.8/f II AF, Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM, Canon 100mm f/2.8 USM Macro AF

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
milleniumking
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
339 posts
Joined Jan 2013
Location: Mississauga Ontario Canada
     
Mar 04, 2014 18:30 as a reply to  @ PhilipJohnBasile's post |  #9

Rather not rub it, more like toss it!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davev
Senior Member
Avatar
440 posts
Likes: 954
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Minnesota, U.S.A.
     
Mar 04, 2014 18:34 |  #10

Did you Micro Focus Adjust the lens?


Dave, Flickr (external link) Smugmug (external link)
Sony Junkie.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nightcat
Goldmember
4,533 posts
Likes: 28
Joined Aug 2008
     
Mar 04, 2014 18:37 |  #11

milleniumking wrote in post #16734754 (external link)
So i guess the people on here should not be trusted.... :)

Not sure who told you to make this purchase? There are many threads and hundreds of posts here that compare all of the 70-200mm zooms. Almost everyone has come to the same conclusion that the 70-200mm 2.8 IS II and the 70-200mm f4 IS are far superior to the others. So, it appears the folks here can be trusted. Did you read the reviews at Photozone or the digital picture?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
milleniumking
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
339 posts
Joined Jan 2013
Location: Mississauga Ontario Canada
     
Mar 04, 2014 18:40 |  #12

nightcat wrote in post #16734803 (external link)
Not sure who told you to make this purchase? There are many threads and hundreds of posts here that compare all of the 70-200mm zooms. Almost everyone has come to the same conclusion that the 70-200mm 2.8 IS II and the 70-200mm f4 IS are far superior to the others. So, it appears the folks here can be trusted. Did you read the reviews at Photozone or the digital picture?

Calm down, i was just joking. It was just a bad decision on my part thats all. I have read the reviews and stuff but wanted to try for myself.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rubberhead
Goldmember
Avatar
1,899 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2006
Location: South Carolina's Lowcountry
     
Mar 04, 2014 20:38 |  #13

Give it time, it seems like I'm always initially disappointed with a new lens. I guess there's something of a learning curve.


EQUIPMENT: 40D | Rebel XT | EF 70-200mm f/4L IS | EF-S 10-22mm | EF 28-135mm IS | EF-S 18-55mm IS | EF 50mm 1.8 - flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
whuband
Goldmember
Avatar
1,433 posts
Likes: 84
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
     
Mar 05, 2014 12:31 |  #14

There are thousands of v1 photos inside and on the covers of magazines all over the world. Your body and lens might need a tune up. (mf adjustment maybe?)


1D4, 6D, 7D2, Sony a6000 with Sony16-70, Rokinon 12mmf2, Canon lenses: 17-40L, 17-55 f2.8, 10-22, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.8, 70-200mm IS 2.8, 300mm 2.8 IS, 580EXII (3), 430EX, Alien Bees.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkbslc
Cream of the Crop
24,604 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Utah, USA
     
Mar 05, 2014 12:39 |  #15

Is this one of those things where it's just a tiny bit worse when you zoom into 100% or is it really noticeable? I know people debate the quality of all these lenses, but all of them are very, very good in real world scenarios. You may try turning off IS in situations where it isn't going to help and waiting a second for the IS to fully initialize while using it.

This site seems to indicate that the IS lens is a tiny bit sharper: http://www.the-digital-picture.com …omp=0&FLIComp=2​&APIComp=0 (external link)


Taylor
Galleries: Flickr (external link)
EOS Rp | iPhone 11 Pro Max

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

8,222 views & 0 likes for this thread, 24 members have posted to it.
i think i may have made a mistake....
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is zachary24
1445 guests, 132 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.