Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 06 Mar 2014 (Thursday) 06:52
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Sigma 30mm f/1.4 HSM Art and Sigma dock

 
pknight
Goldmember
Avatar
2,693 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Likes: 128
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Flyover Country
     
Mar 06, 2014 06:52 |  #1

I just received my Sigma 30mm f/1.4 HSM Art lens, and I have never seen such flaky AF performance. WIth my 7D, on a tripod, with a cable release, shooting a high-contrast focus target, its AF is all over the place, hitting focus one time and front focusing by inches the next. I tried to use standard methods to adjust AF, but it is so inconsistent that it is impossible to determine performance at any MA setting. I also tried the Dot-Focus method, which usually works great, but it failed to achieve solid focus over the entire range of -20 to +20.

There are reviews of this lens where the reviewers reported similar behavior, and had to use Live View to focus for their tests. They indicated that the Sigma USB Dock solved the problems and ended up giving the lens a great review. If the lens is as good as many say, I don't want to give up on it. On the the other hand, I don't want to spend another $60 for the dock if I should be returning the lens instead. I am wondering if anyone here has had similar issues with this lens, and if they tried the USB Dock. Thanks.


Digital EOS 90D Canon: EF 50mm f/1.8 II, EF 50mm f/2.5 Compact Macro, Life-Size Converter EF Tamron: SP 17-50mm f/2.8 DiII, 18-400mm f/3.5-6.3 DiII VC HLD, SP 150-600 f/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2, SP 70-200 f/2.8 Di VC USD, 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 DiII VC HLD Sigma: 30mm f/1.4 DC Art Rokinon: 8mm f/3.5 AS IF UMC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GaryD
Member
113 posts
Joined Feb 2014
Location: Home
     
Mar 06, 2014 07:13 |  #2

EF 35mm f/2 IS USM. Same price as the Σ30 1.4 with dock. Major difference: it works.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Eyal
Senior Member
569 posts
Joined May 2011
     
Mar 06, 2014 07:19 |  #3

if you just bought it, you can ask the retailer to fix it under warranty or something. They might be able to fix it without forcing you to buy the dock.


5DMarkIII+Grip | Extender 1.4x III / 2x III
16-35mm F/2.8L II | 24-70mm F/2.8L II | 70-200mm F/2.8L IS II
Σ 50mm F/1.4 | 85mm F/1.2L II | 100mm F/2.8L IS Macro | 135mm F/2L | 300mm F/2.8L IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
idsurfer
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,255 posts
Gallery: 95 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 4379
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Boise, Idaho
     
Mar 06, 2014 07:23 |  #4

Don't hesitate, Return it for another.


Cory
Sony ⍺6700 | Sony 10-20/4 | Sigma 56/1.4 | Tamron 17-70/2.8
flickr (external link)
Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Mar 06, 2014 07:24 |  #5

Heya,

I bought that lens and dock. I sent it back too. I tried to fix the focus with the dock. You certainly can. It's an amazingly sharp and well built lens. But the focus issues from Sigma are a pain--which is why the dock was even made, they recognize it obviously and it's a nice tool to have regardless as not all cameras have built-in MFA. But, that said, I tried to fix mine's focus issues and I could never get it 100%, not even 90% there. I'd get 2 out of 4 of the focus ranges focusing right, then when I tried to get that 3rd and 4th, I just couldn't get it and the other 2 would start to not focus well anymore either. It's just a pain.

So I sent it back and got the Canon EF 35mm F2 IS.

I'm completely happy with the 35mm F2 IS.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gabebalazs
Bird Whisperer
Avatar
7,643 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 1070
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Toledo, OH
     
Mar 06, 2014 07:28 |  #6

Before you return it, do an experiment please, I'm curious to see something...

Use an off-center AF point on your 7D and test it that way. Also, test it with your XT too.
I'm curious about the results. There may be a slim chance that your 7D, similarly to many other 7Ds in the past, gives very inconsistent results with certain fast primes AND center single AF point.

Of course, that doesn't mean that if the off-center points perform better, you can keep the lens, since obviously the combo isn't capable of good AF results. But just the heck of it, try those off-center points.


SONY A7RIII | SONY A7III | SONY RX10 IV | SONY RX100 | 24-70 2.8 GM | 70-200 2.8 GM | 16-35 F/4 | PZ 18-105 F/4 | FE 85 1.8 | FE 28-70 | SIGMA 35 1.4 ART | SIGMA 150-600 C | ROKINON 14 2.8
Gabe Balazs Photo (external link)
Nature Shots Portfolio (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pknight
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,693 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Likes: 128
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Flyover Country
     
Mar 06, 2014 08:02 |  #7

gabebalazs wrote in post #16738379 (external link)
Before you return it, do an experiment please, I'm curious to see something...

Use an off-center AF point on your 7D and test it that way. Also, test it with your XT too.
I'm curious about the results. There may be a slim chance that your 7D, similarly to many other 7Ds in the past, gives very inconsistent results with certain fast primes AND center single AF point.

Of course, that doesn't mean that if the off-center points perform better, you can keep the lens, since obviously the combo isn't capable of good AF results. But just the heck of it, try those off-center points.

Thanks, Gabe. I will give that a try before sending it back and post the results It won't be until tomorrow, though. The EF 35mm f/2 might be where I end up.


Digital EOS 90D Canon: EF 50mm f/1.8 II, EF 50mm f/2.5 Compact Macro, Life-Size Converter EF Tamron: SP 17-50mm f/2.8 DiII, 18-400mm f/3.5-6.3 DiII VC HLD, SP 150-600 f/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2, SP 70-200 f/2.8 Di VC USD, 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 DiII VC HLD Sigma: 30mm f/1.4 DC Art Rokinon: 8mm f/3.5 AS IF UMC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
phreeky
Goldmember
3,515 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Australia
     
Mar 06, 2014 08:23 |  #8

Are you testing it under fluorescent/artificial light?

With my Sigma 30 (non-ART) on the 7D I had trouble under fluro lights. I think it was inconsistent because it depended on where in the 50/60Hz AC cycle the fluro light was, probably a different wavelength or something, and the AF would shift all over the place (you'll notice focusing scales on lenses different for IR versus visible light etc).

I think it happens with all lenses but is particularly noticeable with fast lenses, which is not unusual.

Using AF-assist (speedlight) or shooting in natural light I had consistent AF.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pknight
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,693 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Likes: 128
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Flyover Country
     
Mar 06, 2014 09:22 |  #9

phreeky wrote in post #16738474 (external link)
Are you testing it under fluorescent/artificial light?

With my Sigma 30 (non-ART) on the 7D I had trouble under fluro lights. I think it was inconsistent because it depended on where in the 50/60Hz AC cycle the fluro light was, probably a different wavelength or something, and the AF would shift all over the place (you'll notice focusing scales on lenses different for IR versus visible light etc).

I think it happens with all lenses but is particularly noticeable with fast lenses, which is not unusual.

Using AF-assist (speedlight) or shooting in natural light I had consistent AF.

Interesting thought. All of the lights in both rooms that I tested this in have fluorescent lights. I don't know if I have any incandescent lights anywhere. When the weather clears I will try it outside in natural light, and I will see what happens with AF assist as well. With so few incandescent lights these days, it would be a shame if a 1.4 lens needs flash for interior shots.


Digital EOS 90D Canon: EF 50mm f/1.8 II, EF 50mm f/2.5 Compact Macro, Life-Size Converter EF Tamron: SP 17-50mm f/2.8 DiII, 18-400mm f/3.5-6.3 DiII VC HLD, SP 150-600 f/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2, SP 70-200 f/2.8 Di VC USD, 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 DiII VC HLD Sigma: 30mm f/1.4 DC Art Rokinon: 8mm f/3.5 AS IF UMC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mnphotos
Senior Member
Avatar
759 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 26
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Arizona
     
Mar 06, 2014 12:02 |  #10

I recently was focus testing that combination also, Sigma 30mm Art with 7D. I didn't have any of those focusing issues you're experiencing. I did it in my kitchen when there was lots of natural light coming in the windows though. I also got the dock, mainly for the T2i since it doesn't have MF capabilities. I put a white box behind the focus target so the background wouldn't have any contrasty subjects to focus on other than the target.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
robienyshe
Member
129 posts
Joined Jan 2013
Location: Dallas,tx
     
Mar 06, 2014 12:18 |  #11

MalVeauX wrote in post #16738369 (external link)
Heya,

I bought that lens and dock. I sent it back too. I tried to fix the focus with the dock. You certainly can. It's an amazingly sharp and well built lens. But the focus issues from Sigma are a pain--which is why the dock was even made, they recognize it obviously and it's a nice tool to have regardless as not all cameras have built-in MFA. But, that said, I tried to fix mine's focus issues and I could never get it 100%, not even 90% there. I'd get 2 out of 4 of the focus ranges focusing right, then when I tried to get that 3rd and 4th, I just couldn't get it and the other 2 would start to not focus well anymore either. It's just a pain.

So I sent it back and got the Canon EF 35mm F2 IS.

I'm completely happy with the 35mm F2 IS.

Very best,



I'm also looking for another prime (Sigma 30mm 1.4 Art or Canon 35 F2 IS) but not sure which one. How does 35 f2 performs in low light? Is it good for group shot i.e 4-5 people? Would it be fast like the 85 f1.8? Would there be big difference between 40 and 35mm? Planning to buy in a month or 2 for coming vacation..


T4i, Σ 17-50 f2.8, 18-55mm, 55-250mm, 50mm f1.8, 40mm f2.8, 85mm f1.8, 430EXII SpeedLite, LR4, DOLICA AX620B100

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Mar 06, 2014 12:25 |  #12

robienyshe wrote in post #16739000 (external link)
I'm also looking for another prime (Sigma 30mm 1.4 Art or Canon 35 F2 IS) but not sure which one. How does 35 f2 performs in low light? Is it good for group shot i.e 4-5 people? Would it be fast like the 85 f1.8? Would there be big difference between 40 and 35mm? Planning to buy in a month or 2 for coming vacation..

Heya,

I use my 35 F2 IS for everything, it's my go to primary lens. Does very well in low light. Nails focus every time for me. I can do handheld shots at 2 seconds with it even, with it's generation of IS. It's just a phenomenal lens. Very sharp. Great contrast. Great color. It's wide enough to do group shots, we did it at Christmas. It's fast like the 85 F1.8. I use the 35mm F2 IS and 85mm F1.8 the most, they are my two main primes. There's not a massive difference between the 35mm and 40mm in terms of field of view, it's minor. But there is a difference in depth of field control, sharpness, IS performance, etc. The 40mm is a great travel lens. But it's a whole stop slower, and it doesn't have the same image quality as the 35mm. Comes down to budget. I still pick the 35mm even at more than twice the cost, it just performs so well, without the `L price tag (and frankly is as good, if not possibly a bit better, than the 35L... bring the flames).

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pknight
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,693 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Likes: 128
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Flyover Country
     
Mar 06, 2014 14:52 |  #13

mnphotos wrote in post #16738973 (external link)
I recently was focus testing that combination also, Sigma 30mm Art with 7D. I didn't have any of those focusing issues you're experiencing. I did it in my kitchen when there was lots of natural light coming in the windows though. I also got the dock, mainly for the T2i since it doesn't have MF capabilities. I put a white box behind the focus target so the background wouldn't have any contrasty subjects to focus on other than the target.

My target was pinned to a totally blank wall. Nothing there but the target.


Digital EOS 90D Canon: EF 50mm f/1.8 II, EF 50mm f/2.5 Compact Macro, Life-Size Converter EF Tamron: SP 17-50mm f/2.8 DiII, 18-400mm f/3.5-6.3 DiII VC HLD, SP 150-600 f/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2, SP 70-200 f/2.8 Di VC USD, 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 DiII VC HLD Sigma: 30mm f/1.4 DC Art Rokinon: 8mm f/3.5 AS IF UMC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pknight
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,693 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Likes: 128
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Flyover Country
     
Mar 06, 2014 15:28 |  #14

gabebalazs wrote in post #16738379 (external link)
Before you return it, do an experiment please, I'm curious to see something...

Use an off-center AF point on your 7D and test it that way. Also, test it with your XT too.
I'm curious about the results. There may be a slim chance that your 7D, similarly to many other 7Ds in the past, gives very inconsistent results with certain fast primes AND center single AF point.

Of course, that doesn't mean that if the off-center points perform better, you can keep the lens, since obviously the combo isn't capable of good AF results. But just the heck of it, try those off-center points.

Gabe,

I did have a chance to try it again, using the Dot-Tune method (http://www.youtube.com​/watch?v=7zE50jCUPhM (external link)). I got flaky results with the center point again (although different flakes than yesterday), so I tried an off-center AF point. I thought that might be it, as the behavior of the AF was much more systematic at first. However, upon rechecking the results it started to indicate that the settings that had achieved focus a few minutes earlier were no longer achieving focus. So much for that. I just don't have any way to check the focus accuracy or make logical adjustments to the focus at this time.

I haven't had time to try the XT yet, but I have no intention of using it on the XT, so I just may not.

We will be visiting the grandkids this weekend, so I might take a slew of indoor shots to see how it behaves. If it can't work consistently indoors, there isn't much point to having it.


Digital EOS 90D Canon: EF 50mm f/1.8 II, EF 50mm f/2.5 Compact Macro, Life-Size Converter EF Tamron: SP 17-50mm f/2.8 DiII, 18-400mm f/3.5-6.3 DiII VC HLD, SP 150-600 f/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2, SP 70-200 f/2.8 Di VC USD, 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 DiII VC HLD Sigma: 30mm f/1.4 DC Art Rokinon: 8mm f/3.5 AS IF UMC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Maverique
Senior Member
Avatar
880 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Portugal
     
Mar 06, 2014 15:58 |  #15

I don't seem to be able to do AF alignment operations on mine, even :/ must be a compatibility issue with Windows 8.1 as it wasn't even detecting the connected lens until I ran it as an administrator.


My website (external link) | My facebook (external link) | My flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,918 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
Sigma 30mm f/1.4 HSM Art and Sigma dock
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1596 guests, 139 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.