Upskirting, as you know it, is now officially LEGAL, Or at least Massachusetts court rule so!
LINK![]()
samsen Cream of the Crop 7,468 posts Likes: 239 Joined Apr 2006 Location: LA More info | Mar 06, 2014 10:54 | #1 Upskirting, as you know it, is now officially LEGAL, Or at least Massachusetts court rule so! Weak retaliates,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 06, 2014 11:03 | #2 I was looking at a discussion about this on another forum, and there was some debate as to whether it was ever illegal in the first place. Seems like that particular law is poorly written, with the wording "nude or partially nude." http://www.avidchick.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mbellot "My dog ate my title" 3,365 posts Likes: 20 Joined Jul 2005 Location: The Miami of Canada - Chicago! More info | Mar 06, 2014 14:05 | #3 nathancarter wrote in post #16738816 Everyone is nude or partially nude underneath their clothes. I think the loophole is underwear, but what happens to the "artist" that happens across a model that has decided to go commando?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thedcmule2 Goldmember 1,125 posts Likes: 3 Joined Nov 2011 More info | Mar 06, 2014 15:24 | #4 Why is this even a topic of concern? Perverts with cameras ugh
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 06, 2014 16:02 | #5 thedcmule2 wrote in post #16739470 Why is this even a topic of concern? Perverts with cameras ugh The question posed in your first sentence is answered by your second sentence. http://www.avidchick.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 06, 2014 17:05 | #6 I wonder if law wants to go so amiable here, what would be the the other laws applying to person of keen breaking camera of lawful photography or whether if the jury or judge are any merciful to the attacher of the photographer that seems to be involving in his very lawful photo practice, with his north pointing photo habits, by the unwanted photographed person!? Weak retaliates,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 07, 2014 00:38 | #7 They wuickly passed a law banning it
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 07, 2014 09:35 | #8 I wonder what's in the exact wording of the new law, and how it can be misused in such a way that all photography is criminalized. http://www.avidchick.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhotosGuy Cream of the Crop, R.I.P. More info | Mar 07, 2014 10:36 | #9 It may have been legal then, but I'll bet he spent more on his lawyer than a trip to Cancun would have cost? ; D FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1351 guests, 137 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||