Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
Thread started 06 Mar 2014 (Thursday) 12:19
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

USB 3 + USB 2 vs. USB 3 hub

 
buddy4344
OM System Ambassador
Avatar
1,693 posts
Gallery: 412 photos
Best ofs: 14
Likes: 2174
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Allentown, PA
     
Mar 06, 2014 12:19 |  #1

My laptop has a USB 3 port and a USB 2 port. I want to transfer RAW iamges via a USB 3 CF card reader to portable external HDD with USB 3. I currently plug the card reader into the USB 3 and the external drive into the USB 2. QUESTION: Would the transfer actually be faster if I had a USB 3.0 hub and connected both the card reader and the drive to that?

I don't have a USB 3.0 hub, but am considering this if it speeds transfer.


Buddy4344

OM System Ambassador, Gear: Olympus OM-1 and EM1X, Olympus/Zuiko Lenses: 150-400mm f/4.5, 40-150mm f/2.8, 12-40 f/2.8, Oly 2x and 1.4x TCon, Kiboko 30L and 22L+

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,690 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 1074
Joined Aug 2009
     
Mar 06, 2014 14:18 |  #2

USB 3.0 has 10x the bandwidth of USB 2.0 so it has plenty of capacity to handle a memory card and a hard drive, neither of which are terribly fast, but are likely faster than USB 2.0. How fast are you memory cards rated for?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
morph2_7
Goldmember
1,112 posts
Joined Sep 2012
Location: Los Angeles
     
Mar 06, 2014 15:53 |  #3

judging by the huge speed difference between USB2 and USB3, I'd say you should get some speed improvement. However, I don't know for sure if there are no other variables such as collisions (like packet collisions in ethernet hubs) that play a role in slowing down your transfer speed. I'm not even sure if there's such thing as packet collisions in USB hubs.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
buddy4344
THREAD ­ STARTER
OM System Ambassador
Avatar
1,693 posts
Gallery: 412 photos
Best ofs: 14
Likes: 2174
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Allentown, PA
     
Mar 06, 2014 16:01 |  #4

mike_d wrote in post #16739277 (external link)
USB 3.0 has 10x the bandwidth of USB 2.0 so it has plenty of capacity to handle a memory card and a hard drive, neither of which are terribly fast, but are likely faster than USB 2.0. How fast are you memory cards rated for?

My newer cards are fast. I have the Lexar 1000x which claim write speeds of 95 MB sec. My Sandisk claim 60MB/sec. ... and then I have some older ones more in the 30 mb/sec.


Buddy4344

OM System Ambassador, Gear: Olympus OM-1 and EM1X, Olympus/Zuiko Lenses: 150-400mm f/4.5, 40-150mm f/2.8, 12-40 f/2.8, Oly 2x and 1.4x TCon, Kiboko 30L and 22L+

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,690 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 1074
Joined Aug 2009
     
Mar 06, 2014 16:37 |  #5

USB 2.0 will limit a device to about 35MB/sec for sequential transfers of large files. A typical hard drive will do about 100MB/sec on such transfers. Moving the hard drive to USB 3.0 should get you some speed increase.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Geonerd
Senior Member
Avatar
542 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 5
Joined May 2009
Location: Aridzona
     
Mar 06, 2014 21:42 |  #6

USB isn't bi-directional, so the one 3.0 connection will have to multiplex between reading from the CF and writing to the HD. Still, USB3 is ~14x faster than USB 2. Even at half speed or a little worse, you should see a nice speed increase.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
buddy4344
THREAD ­ STARTER
OM System Ambassador
Avatar
1,693 posts
Gallery: 412 photos
Best ofs: 14
Likes: 2174
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Allentown, PA
     
Mar 06, 2014 22:07 |  #7

Thanks guys. help like this is why I love this site!


Buddy4344

OM System Ambassador, Gear: Olympus OM-1 and EM1X, Olympus/Zuiko Lenses: 150-400mm f/4.5, 40-150mm f/2.8, 12-40 f/2.8, Oly 2x and 1.4x TCon, Kiboko 30L and 22L+

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
buddy4344
THREAD ­ STARTER
OM System Ambassador
Avatar
1,693 posts
Gallery: 412 photos
Best ofs: 14
Likes: 2174
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Allentown, PA
     
Mar 09, 2014 15:30 |  #8

My USB 3.0 hub arrived today. Quick test transferring 27 Gb of photos on a Lexar 32GB 1000x CF card from the Sandisk 3.0 card reader in a 3.0 USB on computer to a 3.0 HDD on a USB 2.0 port took 2 min. 4 sec. Using the 3.0 hub on the computer's one USB 3.0 port and transferring the same files from the card reader to the HDD took 30 seconds. YEP, 4x faster. Not bad.


Buddy4344

OM System Ambassador, Gear: Olympus OM-1 and EM1X, Olympus/Zuiko Lenses: 150-400mm f/4.5, 40-150mm f/2.8, 12-40 f/2.8, Oly 2x and 1.4x TCon, Kiboko 30L and 22L+

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,690 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 1074
Joined Aug 2009
     
Mar 09, 2014 19:38 |  #9

Nice. I was expecting a speed bump, but not that much.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Mar 14, 2014 07:48 |  #10

Heya,

USB3 really does make an impact. I do a lot of large file transfers and USB3 has made that such a better experience as before I was just using networks as they were just faster than USB2. If all your interfacing is true USB3, you will enjoy the speed.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,048 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
USB 3 + USB 2 vs. USB 3 hub
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1077 guests, 114 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.