Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 09 Mar 2014 (Sunday) 22:52
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

17-55 Dust issue

 
FUJINON
Hatchling
1 post
Joined Mar 2014
Location: Toronto
     
Mar 09, 2014 22:52 |  #1

I have decided to buy 17-55 F2.8 from Canon, and I went to the store for demo and I saw boat load of dust particles in the lens which pissed me off.I want to know is it common with all 17-55 lenses? considering I am going to splash 1000$ so I want the lens to be clean from inside.


Fujifilm Canada employee

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mine1
Goldmember
Avatar
1,289 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jun 2012
Location: Kalispell Montana
     
Mar 09, 2014 23:44 |  #2

I am pretty sure the new one will come mostly dust free, but remember that lens is known for having alot of dust (but almost everyone says that has no affect on function).


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/81190407@N08/ (external link)
Canon 60d.Canon 18-135, 55-250 II, and 10-18 stm. and Benro C-1681t Travel Angel, with Sirui K20x head.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GregDunn
Goldmember
Avatar
1,289 posts
Likes: 132
Joined Mar 2013
Location: Indiana
     
Mar 09, 2014 23:55 as a reply to  @ mine1's post |  #3

I've had mine for 6 years and no dust. I never put it in its pouch and use it almost every day, indoors and out, with constant zooming. Doubtless some people have dust problems with it but I don't know how their use differs from mine. I can say that I have a UV filter attached and never leave the lens sitting around with the back/mount uncovered, but those are the only precautions I take.


Canon 1Dx | 5D3 | 7D2 | 6D | 70-200L f/2.8IS | 70-200L f/4 | 24-70L f/2.8 | 24-105L f/4IS | 100-400L f/4.5-5.6IS | 17-55 f/2.8IS | 50 f/1.8 | 28-105 f/3.5-4.5 | 4x Godox AD360

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bseitz234
Senior Member
Avatar
608 posts
Gallery: 23 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 382
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Maynard, MA, USA
     
Mar 10, 2014 06:52 |  #4

GregDunn wrote in post #16747056 (external link)
I've had mine for 6 years and no dust. I never put it in its pouch and use it almost every day, indoors and out, with constant zooming. Doubtless some people have dust problems with it but I don't know how their use differs from mine. I can say that I have a UV filter attached and never leave the lens sitting around with the back/mount uncovered, but those are the only precautions I take.

^ this! exactly. I bought mine used from lensrentals and it had a few small pieces of dust, but nothing serious. I've had it for another year since then and there's no new dust...



-Brian
5 EOS bodies, and constantly growing lens selection.
IG @bseitz234

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ZoneV
Goldmember
1,644 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 250
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Germany
     
Mar 10, 2014 07:17 |  #5

GregDunn wrote in post #16747056 (external link)
... I can say that I have a UV filter attached and never leave the lens sitting around with the back/mount uncovered, but those are the only precautions I take.

From what I read in German forums a filter is kind of needed for this lens.
Without filter the dust is sucked into it, there are long holes near the front lens which allow air to enter easily.


DIY-Homepage (external link) - Image Gallery (external link) - Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ejhc11
Member
Avatar
163 posts
Joined Jun 2012
Location: Orange County, CA
     
Mar 10, 2014 12:37 |  #6

Talked about it here


Gear and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
werds
"Yes, Sire. You'll shut your trap!"
Avatar
613 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 64
Joined Mar 2014
Location: Delaware
     
Mar 10, 2014 13:34 |  #7

Any suggestions on a decent UV filter since that appears to reduce the issue? Asking since I know this is a touchy subject... currently I shoot no filters on my camera and with a cheap Tiffen UV filter on my wife's camera...


Gear: Nikon D750, Nikon D7200, Sigma 17-50 2.8 OS, Sigma 50-150 2.8 OS HSM EX , Nikon 70-200 2.8 VR1, Tamron 24-70 2.8 VC, Tamron 70-200 2.8 VC, Tamron 28-300mm Di VC PZD, Tamron 16-300mm VC PZD, Tamron 150-600 VC, Nikon AF-S 50mm 1.8, Nikon SB-900
POTN Seller Feedback (and other)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bseitz234
Senior Member
Avatar
608 posts
Gallery: 23 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 382
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Maynard, MA, USA
     
Mar 10, 2014 13:40 |  #8

I have a B&W MRC, F PRO (standard, not slim) mount. No vignetting, good flare control, and lots of peace of mind!



-Brian
5 EOS bodies, and constantly growing lens selection.
IG @bseitz234

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CaliWalkabout
Senior Member
Avatar
337 posts
Likes: 11
Joined May 2010
Location: Oakland, CA, USA
     
Mar 10, 2014 15:21 |  #9

Mine got dust inside. I followed the process available online to remove the front element and cleaned out the interior myself - it's easy and felt like a pretty low risk operation.


6D, 17-40L, 24L II, 50L, 100L, 70-300L.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GregDunn
Goldmember
Avatar
1,289 posts
Likes: 132
Joined Mar 2013
Location: Indiana
     
Mar 10, 2014 15:31 |  #10

ZoneV wrote in post #16747432 (external link)
From what I read in German forums a filter is kinf of needed for this lens.
Without filter the dust is sucked into it, there are long holes near the front lens which allow air to enter easily.

That makes sense. It's a win-win for me if so - I am one of the gadflies who prefers to have a quality UV filter on all my lenses. ;)


Canon 1Dx | 5D3 | 7D2 | 6D | 70-200L f/2.8IS | 70-200L f/4 | 24-70L f/2.8 | 24-105L f/4IS | 100-400L f/4.5-5.6IS | 17-55 f/2.8IS | 50 f/1.8 | 28-105 f/3.5-4.5 | 4x Godox AD360

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SVT ­ Wylde
Senior Member
Avatar
252 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Cleveland Tennessee
     
Mar 10, 2014 17:46 |  #11

A lot of people have dust issues with the 17-55mm and some have no issues at all. ( with and without filters )I have a brand new 17-55mm and I am paranoid about taking pictures with it this spring. The pollen here in the south is brutal so I'm considering a UV filter just to use in dusty conditions.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mag-1981
Senior Member
Avatar
989 posts
Gallery: 16 photos
Likes: 142
Joined May 2012
Location: North Yorkshire, UK
     
Mar 10, 2014 18:38 |  #12

SVT Wylde wrote in post #16748972 (external link)
A lot of people have dust issues with the 17-55mm and some have no issues at all. ( with and without filters )I have a brand new 17-55mm and I am paranoid about taking pictures with it this spring. The pollen here in the south is brutal so I'm considering a UV filter just to use in dusty conditions.

...or to paraphrase this statement, a lot of people have dust in their 17-55mm but only some make it an issue. I had a hard time buying mine, several returns due to various issues and in the space of 4 weeks I had 5 of these in my hands, all brand new, straight from a reputable shop and not a single one of them came dust free. All had some amount of dust and other crap inside, mostly behind the rear element but I eventually decided to keep the one that had dust specs right behind the front glass as this is NOT an issue and the lens is a great performer regardless. I had it for about a year now, use it all the time in all sorts of conditions and it has not acquired any extra dust. BTW, putting a filter on a zoom lens will not stop the dust from getting into the lens as it gets in through the gaps in the barrel.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SVT ­ Wylde
Senior Member
Avatar
252 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Cleveland Tennessee
     
Mar 10, 2014 19:02 |  #13

Mag-1981 wrote in post #16749075 (external link)
BTW, putting a filter on a zoom lens will not stop the dust from getting into the lens as it gets in through the gaps in the barrel.

That's true because my 15-85mm has a few specs of dust on behind the front element and I never knew it was a problem with this lens. It doesn't affect performance but I'd like to keep it to a minimum. I am about to sell the 15-85mm and I'll have to list the dust in my ad and it could affect the resale value.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
alliben
Senior Member
Avatar
326 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Likes: 297
Joined Apr 2011
     
Mar 10, 2014 19:26 |  #14

I just turned a flashlight into mine. One or 2 small particles of dust. No filter. Had it since '07.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
spurscar
Junior Member
Avatar
20 posts
Joined Feb 2014
     
Mar 10, 2014 20:50 |  #15

Mine's got a ton of dust, can't see it in photographs. Bad design or something I guess, only lens I own
that does it this bad.


If ignorance is bliss, going to Clemson must be orgasmic...
70D / 17-55 / 10-22 / 70-200 F2.8L IS / 60 macro / Sigma 30 1.4 / 18-55 STM / Tokina 24-200 / 2x 580 EX flashes

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,967 views & 0 likes for this thread, 15 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
17-55 Dust issue
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2251 guests, 136 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.