adorabledan76 Member 211 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2010 More info | Mar 13, 2014 17:49 | #1 I already have the canon 10-22 and the 35 f2 is I would like something for video and a all around lens worth getting. I don't like that the 10-22 has a aperture off 4.5 at the 22mm so thinking about the 24 2.8 is and the 24 1.4 is to expensive what do think please let me know your thoughts.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 13, 2014 17:50 | #2 Also shooting with the 70d
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 13, 2014 17:59 | #3 Have you tried the 24 is
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 13, 2014 18:09 | #4 the problem with the 24F2.8IS is that it's priced close to the sigma 17-50mm F2.8 OS.... the sigma also does 17-20-24-28-35-50 @ 2.8, and for video having those options is huge. The S17-50 isnt very big or heavy either... Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
eddie3dfx Senior Member 486 posts Likes: 3 Joined Sep 2009 More info | Mar 13, 2014 18:14 | #5 If you do a lot of landscape work and want edge to edge sharpness, then yes. Canon 6D, Canon L 24-105, Zeiss Distagon 28mm 2.8, Planar 50mm 1.4, Planar 85mm 1.4, Sonnar 135mm 2.8 & Zeiss Mutar 2x, Canon 50mm 1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
What like about the 24 is is the light weight plus I don't like zooms more of a prime shooter
LOG IN TO REPLY |
eddie3dfx Senior Member 486 posts Likes: 3 Joined Sep 2009 More info | Mar 13, 2014 18:18 | #7 I just realized that you are on a crop, since you are using a 10-22. Canon 6D, Canon L 24-105, Zeiss Distagon 28mm 2.8, Planar 50mm 1.4, Planar 85mm 1.4, Sonnar 135mm 2.8 & Zeiss Mutar 2x, Canon 50mm 1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 13, 2014 18:27 | #8 Charlie wrote in post #16756637  the problem with the 24F2.8IS is that it's priced close to the sigma 17-50mm F2.8 OS.... the sigma also does 17-20-24-28-35-50 @ 2.8, and for video having those options is huge. The S17-50 isnt very big or heavy either... The 24F2.8 would be a nice lens for FF as FF 24-70's are really big and heavy. Exactly what he said. Canon 7D/350D, Σ17-50/2.8 OS, 18-55IS, 24-105/4 L IS, Σ30/1.4 EX, 50/1.8, C50/1.4, 55-250IS, 60/2.8, 70-200/4 L IS, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 IS L, 135/2 L 580EX II, 430EX II * 2, 270EX II.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MalVeauX "Looks rough and well used"  More info | Mar 13, 2014 18:31 | #9 adorabledan76 wrote in post #16756591 I already have the canon 10-22 and the 35 f2 is I would like something for video and a all around lens worth getting. I don't like that the 10-22 has a aperture off 4.5 at the 22mm so thinking about the 24 2.8 is and the 24 1.4 is to expensive what do think please let me know your thoughts. Heya,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Yeah I tried the sigma 18-35 the canon 17-55' they are to heavy for me
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 13, 2014 19:17 | #11 adorabledan76 wrote in post #16756790 Yeah I tried the sigma 18-35 the canon 17-55' they are to heavy for me Those are both heavier than the 17-50 though. Canon 7D/350D, Σ17-50/2.8 OS, 18-55IS, 24-105/4 L IS, Σ30/1.4 EX, 50/1.8, C50/1.4, 55-250IS, 60/2.8, 70-200/4 L IS, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 IS L, 135/2 L 580EX II, 430EX II * 2, 270EX II.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1584 guests, 171 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
