Thank you. I shall get to grips…..
Thank you. I shall get to grips…..
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 14, 2014 14:22 | #17 gonzogolf wrote in post #16758611 You really need to get a grasp on how the reflective metering works, and how to use exposure compensation to adjust for it. I dont see a problem with the camera. I agree with Gonzogolf. Gerry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JohnfromPA Cream of the Crop 11,262 posts Likes: 1529 Joined May 2003 Location: Southeast Pennsylvania More info | Mar 14, 2014 17:16 | #18 Some good tutorials on the 60D at http://www.learn.usa.canon.com …s/eos_60d_tutorials.shtml
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rrblint Listen! .... do you smell something? More info | Mar 15, 2014 01:32 | #19 MakisM1 wrote in post #16758675 ...However, I am a bit perplexed if you used Green Box on the upper photo and Av priority, how did the metering system picked two different exposures?... OP is in error, both exposures were made in aperture priority. Image hosted by forum (679729) © rrblint [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Image hosted by forum (679730) © rrblint [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. It is very likely that the big white blob of fungus in the central portion of the second photo caused the under exposure. An adjustment of +1 EC would have fixed it. Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 15, 2014 08:29 | #20 rrblint wrote in post #16759834 OP is in error, both exposures were made in aperture priority. Hosted photo: posted by rrblint in ./showthread.php?p=16759834&i=i54571462 forum: Canon Digital Cameras Hosted photo: posted by rrblint in ./showthread.php?p=16759834&i=i99470026 forum: Canon Digital Cameras It is very likely that the big white blob of fungus in the central portion of the second photo caused the under exposure. An adjustment of +1 EC would have fixed it. I think you are right. The framing is not the same between the two photos, so the white fungus weighs in more in the second photo, dictating the underexposure. Gerry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 15, 2014 09:02 | #21 Thank you very much for your comments, insightful stuff. I must go back to my original message where I mention the exif info. I took a number of shots of the same fungus and others, in fully auto, live shot and aperture priority. When I looked at the exif for all of the shots they all read that they were shot in aperture priority, when they clearly were not, I was hoping I could use the exif data to analyse the differences……..
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JohnfromPA Cream of the Crop 11,262 posts Likes: 1529 Joined May 2003 Location: Southeast Pennsylvania More info | Mar 15, 2014 09:38 | #22 Andy O wrote in post #16760243 When I looked at the exif for all of the shots they all read that they were shot in aperture priority, when they clearly were not, I was hoping I could use the exif data to analyse the differences…….. I suggest you load up the Digital Photo Professional software that came with the camera and then you can positively do what you want. Anything else may introduce an unknown. The unknown may not necessarily be bad but lets get beyond your problems first.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
I have uploaded DPP, this is where I copied the exif info from, so there should be no unknowns..
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2149 guests, 128 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||