Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
Thread started 17 Mar 2014 (Monday) 00:52
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Is it common...

 
the ­ flying ­ moose
Goldmember
1,640 posts
Likes: 78
Joined Dec 2006
     
Mar 17, 2014 00:52 |  #1

for photographers in your area to buy "likes" on social media, specifically Facebook? I've noticed that recently, in my area anyhow, that there are a number of photogs that don't have many photos posted, very rarely post anything but have thousands of likes. One photographer has 5 posts in all of 2014 so far and in the span of 4 days in February they got 2500 likes. Another photographer recently joined Facebook and only has one post. In one hour they have well over 500 likes.

I'm not complaining or anything, it's more of an observation and curiosity to see if this is a common thing everywhere.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FarmerTed1971
fondling the 5D4
Avatar
7,352 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 5909
Joined Sep 2013
Location: Portland, OR
     
Mar 17, 2014 01:00 |  #2

Facebook "boost"? How does that even work?


Getting better at this - Fuji X-t5 & X-t3 - 16 1.4 - 35/50/90 f2 - 50-140 - flickr (external link) - www.scottaticephoto.co​m (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
the ­ flying ­ moose
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,640 posts
Likes: 78
Joined Dec 2006
     
Mar 17, 2014 01:06 |  #3

FarmerTed1971 wrote in post #16763974 (external link)
Facebook "boost"? How does that even work?

From what I have read it seems that you pay someone and in turn will have likes arrive from all over the world. Seems silly and a waste of money, as well as, being unethical and against Facebook TOS.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bespoke
Senior Member
Avatar
716 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 177
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Toronto
     
Mar 17, 2014 01:20 |  #4

this video will answer all your questions http://www.youtube.com​/watch?v=oVfHeWTKjag (external link)


Retouching (external link)Photography (external link)Instagram (external link)
5D3 & 5D2s | 24 TS-E II, 24-70 II, 85L II, 100L, 70-200L II, 35 & 85 Zeiss ZE, Samyang 14, Sigma 50
Hasselblads + Leaf Aptus MFDB, Fuji X100, Epson 3880/9890

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
the ­ flying ­ moose
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,640 posts
Likes: 78
Joined Dec 2006
     
Mar 17, 2014 02:07 |  #5

bespoke wrote in post #16763989 (external link)
this video will answer all your questions http://www.youtube.com​/watch?v=oVfHeWTKjag (external link)

Very interesting. Seems like a huge waste of time and money overall.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dan ­ Marchant
Do people actually believe in the Title Fairy?
Avatar
5,634 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 2056
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Where I'm from is unimportant, it's where I'm going that counts.
     
Mar 18, 2014 00:47 |  #6

the flying moose wrote in post #16764032 (external link)
Very interesting. Seems like a huge waste of time and money overall.

Exactly - seems that even if you don't buy like (but pay for an advert/boost) you get hundreds of fake profiles liking you and using up your ad revenue. The engagement figures are shocking. It is a hopeless advertising medium.


Dan Marchant
Website/blog: danmarchant.com (external link)
Instagram: @dan_marchant (external link)
Gear Canon 5DIII + Fuji X-T2 + lenses + a plastic widget I found in the camera box.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
the ­ flying ­ moose
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,640 posts
Likes: 78
Joined Dec 2006
     
Mar 18, 2014 01:03 |  #7

What do "likes" do for a business that they would do all this for? Whats the benefit?? I don't use Facebook that much and probably wouldn't use it much if I had a business either.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EveryMilesAMemory
Goldmember
Avatar
3,948 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Likes: 3474
Joined May 2007
Location: Cedar Key Florida
     
Mar 18, 2014 10:00 |  #8

bespoke wrote in post #16763989 (external link)
this video will answer all your questions http://www.youtube.com​/watch?v=oVfHeWTKjag (external link)

Thanks for that link, this drove home to NEVER pay for advertising on Facebook!!


Pat Bonish
www.everymilesamemory.​com (external link)
www.patbonishphotograp​hy.com (external link)
http://www.instagram.c​om/bonish_photo/[/URL (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nathancarter
Cream of the Crop
5,474 posts
Gallery: 32 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 609
Joined Dec 2010
     
Mar 18, 2014 10:17 |  #9

Fake likes do nothing.
Real, organic likes can get your name and your work in front of your target client - *IF* your target client is a Facebook user.

Facebook user engagement is a snowball effect - the more engagement you have, the more you get. But if all your engagement is from fake profiles, none of them are buying what you're showing.


http://www.avidchick.c​om (external link) for business stuff
http://www.facebook.co​m/VictorVoyeur (external link) for fun stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
1000WordsPhotography
Senior Member
525 posts
Likes: 141
Joined Aug 2009
     
Mar 18, 2014 10:19 |  #10

I'm not advising anyone who cares about their social media strategy to buy likes (from Facebook or Otherwise) however I think people buy them because photographers with more likes seem more likely to win business. I only suggest this because I was asked by two different potential clients about why I had so few likes. One lady told me it was very concerning for her.


Twitter: @1kWordsPhotog
Instagram: @1000WordsPhotographer
Facebook: Here (external link)
Portfolio: Here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
the ­ flying ­ moose
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,640 posts
Likes: 78
Joined Dec 2006
     
Mar 18, 2014 11:13 |  #11

1000WordsPhotography wrote in post #16767444 (external link)
I'm not advising anyone who cares about their social media strategy to buy likes (from Facebook or Otherwise) however I think people buy them because photographers with more likes seem more likely to win business. I only suggest this because I was asked by two different potential clients about why I had so few likes. One lady told me it was very concerning for her.

See I wouldn't even care about likes when picking a photographer. I would look at the quality of work, even more so now that I know how easy it is to buy those likes.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
peeaanuut
Goldmember
Avatar
3,560 posts
Gallery: 33 photos
Likes: 708
Joined Feb 2011
     
Mar 18, 2014 11:24 |  #12

the flying moose wrote in post #16767556 (external link)
See I wouldn't even care about likes when picking a photographer. I would look at the quality of work, even more so now that I know how easy it is to buy those likes.

but your view is skewed as you are a photographer. Likes, followers, retweets, reblogs, retumbles (is that the proper term?), etc all seem to matter to a lot of people. Popularity seems to be the same as good now a days. Obviously its ridiculous, but it is the current online world we live in. I guess its not too much different from when newspapers and magazines used to tout their circulation numbers or TV stations brag about their viewership. its that "others are looking and liking, maybe I should be too" attitude. Quantity over quality thought process. Its the energy behind the "if we get to 1000 likes, we will give everyone a high five" crap you see all the time on FB.


Stuff
http://joetakesphotos.​com/ (external link) : | : https://www.facebook.c​om/JKlingPhotos (external link) : | : https://twitter.com/jk​lingphotos (external link)
airbutchie - Joe was definitely right about adding contrast...
:)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
the ­ flying ­ moose
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,640 posts
Likes: 78
Joined Dec 2006
     
Mar 18, 2014 14:28 |  #13

peeaanuut wrote in post #16767576 (external link)
but your view is skewed as you are a photographer. Likes, followers, retweets, reblogs, retumbles (is that the proper term?), etc all seem to matter to a lot of people. Popularity seems to be the same as good now a days. Obviously its ridiculous, but it is the current online world we live in. I guess its not too much different from when newspapers and magazines used to tout their circulation numbers or TV stations brag about their viewership. its that "others are looking and liking, maybe I should be too" attitude. Quantity over quality thought process. Its the energy behind the "if we get to 1000 likes, we will give everyone a high five" crap you see all the time on FB.

Maybe, but I have never been active on social media so I think likes mean nothing to me in general. I only joined Facebook last summer. I check Instagram every couple of days. I have a handful of tweets on Twitter in nearly 2 years.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sirquack
Goldmember
Avatar
2,599 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 937
Joined Jan 2013
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
     
Mar 18, 2014 16:48 |  #14

To expand on this particular part of the topic, I remember not too many years ago, you could easily get free subscriptions to magazines because as mentioned here, those magazines were using the fact that you "subscribed" even for free to their advertisers which is what they based their ad rates on. I think more people have learned about this and consequently it is not as often that you can find free subscriptions to magazines because they now have to get some of their income from actual subscriptions.
The video previously posted is exactly why Facebook has a horrible marketing program. You can buy non organic likes and it will mean absolutely nothing. I would rather have my friends share my information with their friends, if they choose to do so, in order to get my product in front of people who are more likely to actually want something I have to offer.

peeaanuut wrote in post #16767576 (external link)
but your view is skewed as you are a photographer. Likes, followers, retweets, reblogs, retumbles (is that the proper term?), etc all seem to matter to a lot of people. Popularity seems to be the same as good now a days. Obviously its ridiculous, but it is the current online world we live in. I guess its not too much different from when newspapers and magazines used to tout their circulation numbers or TV stations brag about their viewership. its that "others are looking and liking, maybe I should be too" attitude. Quantity over quality thought process. Its the energy behind the "if we get to 1000 likes, we will give everyone a high five" crap you see all the time on FB.


Name is Ron.
Bodies - 6D/5D3/7D2-Gripped
Lenses - Canon 17-40 F4/24-70 F2.8 II/85 F1.8/Canon 70-200 F2.8 II/F4/Sigma 30 DC/Tamron 150-600
Website (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Karl ­ Johnston
Cream of the Crop
9,334 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jul 2008
     
Mar 18, 2014 23:01 |  #15
bannedPermanent ban

Common, who knows. Stupid? Definitely.


Adventurous Photographer, Writer (external link) & Wedding Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,189 views & 0 likes for this thread, 15 members have posted to it.
Is it common...
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1366 guests, 181 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.