Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 17 Mar 2014 (Monday) 21:21
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Help with constantly over exposed picutures

 
rantercsr
Goldmember
Avatar
3,794 posts
Gallery: 67 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 9535
Joined Mar 2014
     
Mar 17, 2014 21:21 |  #1

i would say 75% of my pictures come out over exposed.
i'm not sure if this is a result of using priority mode?
meter is always centered so i always assume i'm good ... but then it looks like the side walks and streets always refelect so much light.

i took this picture from my car so never mind it not being the greatest picture:oops:
this was about 11am, cloudy the sun was not out at all

this was taken with the t4i and a canon 50mm 1.4 @ f2.8 using auto focus
does the t4i have the tendency to over expose even when meter is centered? i keep aiming for dead center assuming the camera knows more than me. and it looks fine in the view finder.. thats the other thing,, when i first started with this camera i used the screen to see pictures , and the pictures came out how i saw them in the screen, but then i started doing alot of reading to learn how to take better pictures(specifically tips on how to do better street photography) and i felt like most advised to use the view finder ,, and so i have and now i'm constantly over exposed

its getting a bit frustrating as i've feel that i've gotten a few good pics only to end up being over exposed ,, any tips would be very much appreciated

perhaps its best to bite the bullet and go thru the growing pains of going Manual mode now rather than later


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE

My portraits IG (external link)
MY flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AlFooteIII
Senior Member
449 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 41
Joined Jul 2013
Location: New York City
     
Mar 17, 2014 21:37 |  #2

How do you feel that this image is overexposed? You might want to look at a histogram for your images. This image is not technically overexposed at all.


Specializing in Theatrical Photography. See my work at:
www.alfoote3photograph​y.com/ (external link)
www.facebook.com/alfoo​te3photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nogo
POTN record for # of posts during "Permanent Ban"
9,193 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Likes: 685
Joined Dec 2013
Location: All Along the Natchez Trace (Clinton, MS)
     
Mar 17, 2014 21:53 |  #3

The first question to answer: Is your monitor calibrated?

The average computer monitor is brighter than it should be. Not a problem for most computer uses, but it is for processing photos.


Philip

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rantercsr
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,794 posts
Gallery: 67 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 9535
Joined Mar 2014
     
Mar 17, 2014 22:18 as a reply to  @ Nogo's post |  #4

i am new to photography so it could be that i'm not fully understanding how to evealuate my photos..
the sidewalk and street look alot more pale than what i remember seeing..
i'm working on getting a better pc.. but at the moment i'm using a $300 toshiba laptop..so i'm sure its pretty safe to say that i'm not getting the most accurate reflection of what i actually did


My portraits IG (external link)
MY flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scatterbrained
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,511 posts
Gallery: 267 photos
Best ofs: 12
Likes: 4607
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Yomitan, Okinawa, Japan
     
Mar 17, 2014 22:29 |  #5

The histogram looks pretty good to me:

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2014/03/3/LQ_680045.jpg
Image hosted by forum (680045) © Scatterbrained [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

VanillaImaging.com (external link)"Vacuous images for the Vapid consumer"
500px (external link)
flickr (external link)
1x (external link)
instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rantercsr
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,794 posts
Gallery: 67 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 9535
Joined Mar 2014
     
Mar 17, 2014 22:34 as a reply to  @ Scatterbrained's post |  #6

well then,, perhaps my home work for tonight is learning how to read a histogram:o

thanks for the input guys


My portraits IG (external link)
MY flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"That's what I do."
Avatar
17,636 posts
Gallery: 213 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8386
Joined Dec 2008
Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot
     
Mar 17, 2014 22:47 |  #7

rantercsr wrote in post #16766400 (external link)
well then,, perhaps my home work for tonight is learning how to read a histogram:o

thanks for the input guys

That would be an evening well-spent, and it might even be kind of fun to learn more about histograms!


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAlz1
Goldmember
Avatar
1,475 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Somewhere Great!
     
Mar 17, 2014 22:48 |  #8

Monitor calibration, ;)




Eos 7D, 40D w/70-200L 2.8 IS, 50mm 1.4, Nifty Fifty II, 100MM 2.8 Macro, 18-135mm IS , Sigma 30mm 1.4 , Sigma 18-35 1.8 ART 580ex II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Mar 17, 2014 23:42 |  #9

Nogo wrote in post #16766304 (external link)
The first question to answer: Is your monitor calibrated?

The average computer monitor is brighter than it should be. Not a problem for most computer uses, but it is for processing photos.

And your browser can make a difference, too. WEB BROWSER CHECK - Test Page (external link) - ICC profiles and Photoshop Color Management


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KristinPalmer
Junior Member
25 posts
Joined Mar 2014
     
Mar 18, 2014 02:11 |  #10

<puts monitor calibration on the To Do list>




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Woodworker
Goldmember
2,176 posts
Joined Aug 2009
Location: East Midlands, England
     
Mar 18, 2014 05:25 |  #11

KristinPalmer wrote in post #16766695 (external link)
<puts monitor calibration on the To Do list>

But he uses a lappy, so a good monitor is the main priority.


David

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JWdlft
Senior Member
336 posts
Likes: 67
Joined Feb 2013
     
Mar 18, 2014 05:55 as a reply to  @ KristinPalmer's post |  #12

You're using Canon's DPP to view/convert your .CR2 RAW images. DPP uses the picture style you use in the camera as a starting point for processing. In this case it's 'Neutral'.

The 'neutral' style is, according to the camera manual, 'for users who prefer to process images with their computer. For natural colors and subdued images.'

Your image is not over exposed (histogram), but it lacks contrast, like flare, as if it was shot into the light. Bricks can reflect like that. Cloudy days can do that too, with diffused light coming from everywhere and shooting in the general direction of the sun, and coupled with the neutral style it might look a little washed out.

DPP lets you chose a different picture style as starting point for processing .CR2s.
If you shoot .JPG, then the style in your camera is what you get as a starting point.

In DPP, the RAW tab, you'll see a histogram. Grab the vertical line on the left side (on the right of the gray area) and drag it to the right, over the left side of the graph. See the effect of that on the contrast. Just 'setting the black point' a little to the right can work wonders. Experiment. You can Edit/save recipe in file -or- copy recipe to clipboard, and apply the same edit to any other RAW files you want.

Fool around with brightness, contrast, curves, anything you want, that's what processing is for.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,080 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Help with constantly over exposed picutures
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1676 guests, 139 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.